Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 28

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

< September 27	September 29 >

September 28

File:Strawberry-Blonde American Boy.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by an edit-warring user; no useful encyclopedic purpose (Wikipedia is not a free web host). — CharlieEchoTango — 03:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I normally wouldn't care, but the uploader has been entirely disruptive rather than follow protocol, has vindictively blanked my user page in retaliation for reverting him, and should have been blocked longer, like a year or two for maturity. Several users removed his file from Blond commenting that it was apparently an extraneous blurry self-portrait on a page already overloaded with images. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 11:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator. Really strange photo :). Adrian (talk) 06:44, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1234883933LuigiGanna-Milaan-1909.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative image, no discussion of the photograph itself in the article WP:NFCC#8 Mosmof (talk) 04:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the image is 102 years old there is a reasonable chance copyright has expired. Do we know who took the photograph, whether it was work for hire and when it was published? The source link gives me a 503 error. Yoenit (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - but I can't nail the source of the image after a couple of reverse searches - I keep getting content aggregator/mirror sites and the most I could find was that the photo was courtesy of "Piet Kessler". Anyway, since EU copyrights expire after 70 years after the author's death, it's probably free? --Mosmof (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, after 70 years it is free. copyright rules. Adrian (talk) 06:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WIGGINS-Prairie-Fire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: derivative image of an artwork using a non-free tag but without the necessary critical commentary for that tag to be valid and no fair-use rationale. No permission from the artist as mentioned in the information template because which the image is being used in the artist biography and not in an article about the painting. ww2censor (talk) 04:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No rationale, no permission, and used in an article about the author and not about the painting itself. Delete. — CharlieEchoTango — 05:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: - No permission from the author, non-free content. Delete. Adrian (talk) 06:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kalsdazzy / Kalai Kannan self-promotion images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures a banned user uploaded of himself to use in his self-promotion. Currently orphaned, with no possible encyclopedic use. The Fifth Horseman (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User is blocked, not banned (there is a difference). However he was uploading in self promotion (I'm the blocking admin). Kwsn (talk) 14:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Albert Ammons.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A public domain (US) image of the subject is available at Commons (commons:File:Albert Ammons.jpg). In any case, we would need to resolve the identical filenames for these different images. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination. I believe this is covered under WP:CSD#F7 (free alternative available). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for further confusion, but as it turns out the public domain status of the Commons file is dubious. Still, withdrawing this nomination in any case. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paley13.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete (replaced by a vector image) and orphaned. David Eppstein (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator. Adrian (talk) 06:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[[:File:]]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. No image name is specified. Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:]] ([{{fullurl:File:|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2011+September+28%23File%3A%5D%5D}} delete] | [[File talk:|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:|action=history}} history] | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:--Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)#File: listed for deletion|--Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)]] ([{{fullurl:User talk:--Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/--Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)|contribs]] | [[Special:ListFiles/--Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)|uploads]] | [[Special:Log/upload/--Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)|upload log]]).[reply]

Duplicate Bantaxaver (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Starkman tomb cu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Starkman tomb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Levistime.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article. no foreseeable use. possibly copyrighted FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slice.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Triangel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2D artwork of some sort. Possibly copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. Unlikely uploader is author. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UIXLogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.