Jump to content

Confession of the Ethiopian Eunuch

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Baptism of the Eunuch, Pieter Lastman
Part of a series on the
Textus Receptus
"A text therefore you have, that has now by everyone been received" (emphasis added): the words from the Elzevier 1633 edition, in Latin, from which the term "Textus receptus" was derived.
Editors and editions
Textual influences
Famous readings
Modern controversy
Translations
icon Christianity portal

The confession of the Ethiopian eunuch is a variant reading in Acts 8:37, widely seen by Textual Critics to be a later interpolation into the text. It is found in the King James Version due to its existence within the Textus Receptus.[1][2][3][4]

It reads in the King James Version as thus:[5]

And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

In the Greek of the Textus Receptus, the verse reads thus:

ειπεν δε ο φιλιππος ει πιστευεις εξ ολης της καρδιας εξεστιν αποκριθεις δε ειπεν πιστευω τον υιον του θεου ειναι τον ιησουν χριστον

The variant is not found in the majority Greek manuscripts, including the earliest ones such as Papyrus 45, Codex Sinaiaticus and the Vaticanus.[6] Most modern translations such as the ESV, NEB, NIV, NLT, the CEV among others put the verse within the footnotes. However, the verse remains in the body of the text within some translations such as the KJV, KJ21 and the NKJV.[5] Its omission has a UBS confidence rating of A.[7] However, the verse has been defended by advocates of the King James Only movement and the Textus Receptus position.[8][9]

Acts 8:37 is among the most noteworthy variants found within the Textus Receptus in addition to the Comma Johanneum, the long ending of Mark, the Pericope Adulterae, the reading "God" in 1 Timothy 3:16 and the "book of life" in Revelation 22:19.[10]

Textus Receptus

[edit]
Erasmus added the confession of the Eunuch into the Textus Receptus

The confession of the Ethiopian Eunuch found its way into popular translations such as the King James version due to its inclusion within the Textus Receptus made by Erasmus of Rotterdam (1466 – 1536). Erasmus himself decided to include the verse in his edition of the Greek text due to its presence in the Latin Vulgate of his day and due to being in the margin of Minuscule 2816 (15th century), which he used in his compilation of the Textus Receptus.[8][11][12]

Erasmus argued that its omission could be explained by "carelessness of scribes".[13] However, modern scholarship sees it as a later addition to the text of the New Testament.[14]

History

[edit]

Although Erasmus saw the variant as authentic, arguing that it was omitted from Greek manuscripts accidentally,[13][15] it has generally been assumed that the verse was initially a margin added by those who found the narrative of Acts 8 lacking, which later found its way into the body of the text.[16]

Manuscripts

[edit]
Codex laudianus is the earliest Greek manuscript to contain the variant

The verse is lacking from most Greek manuscripts such as P45,74 א A B C 33 and 614.[6][2] The first early appearances of the variant exist in the Old Latin manuscripts, and begins to only appear in the Greek around the 6th century.[17]

  1. Excludes the passage: It is missing from the manuscripts 𝔓45 (250ad), 𝔓74 (7th century), Codex Sinaiticus (4th century), Vaticanus (4th century). Alexandrinus (5th century), Ephraemi Rescriptus (5th century), Codex Athous Lavrensis (8th-9th century) and a multitude of other codices and cursives.[7] It is missing from most Byzantine text-type manuscripts..[8][18][19] It is also omitted by most Syriac copies and some Vulgate manuscripts.[15]
  2. Includes the passage: A few Greek manuscripts such as Codex Laudianus (c. 550) and some miniscules include the verse. It is found in the Codex Glazier (4-5th century), the Harclensis Syriac (7th century), some Old Latin and Vulgate manuscripts alongside some Ethiopian, Georgian and Armenian manuscripts.[13] The confession of the Ethiopian eunuch is also quoted by many early Western writers, such as Ireaneus (130 – c. 202), Cyprian (210 – 258), Ambrose (339 – 397), Augustine (354 – 430), Pacian (310–391 AD) and Bede (672/3 – 735).[3][20]
  3. Includes the passage within the margin: Minuscule 2816 (15th century) contains the passage within the margin. This was used by Erasmus in his compilation of the TR.[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Ehrman, Bart D. The Reliability of the New Testament. Fortress Press. ISBN 978-1-4514-1715-9.
  2. ^ a b White, James R.; Baird, Dr Mike (June 2009). The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations?. Baker Books. ISBN 978-0-7642-0605-4.
  3. ^ a b "The Multivalence of the Ethiopian Eunuch and Acts 8:37" (PDF). TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism.
  4. ^ "Why Is Acts 8:37 Omitted from Many Bible Translations?". Catholic Answers. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  5. ^ a b "Bible Gateway passage: Acts 8:37 - King James Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  6. ^ a b "Bible Gateway passage: Acts 8:26-36 - New English Translation". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  7. ^ a b Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament A Companion Volume to the UBS Greek New Testament (1971, United Bible Societies) loc.cit.; UBS version loc.cit.
  8. ^ a b c White, James R.; Baird, Dr Mike (June 2009). The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations?. Baker Books. ISBN 978-0-7642-0605-4.
  9. ^ "Notes on Acts 8.37 - Trinitarian Bible Society". www.tbsbibles.org. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  10. ^ Andrews, Edward D. (2023-06-15). THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS: The "Received Text" of the New Testament. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 979-8-3984-5852-7.
  11. ^ a b Kurt Aland & Barbara Aland, The Text of The New Testament (rev. ed. 1987, Grand Rapids, Eerdmans) pages 303–304.
  12. ^ Brooke Foss Westcott & Fenton John Anthony Hort, The New Testament in the Original Greek (1881, Cambridge & London, Macmillan & Co.) vol. 2 (Appendix) page 93.
  13. ^ a b c Metzger, Bruce Manning (2003). The New Testament: Its Background, Growth, and Content. Abingdon Press. ISBN 978-0-687-05263-9.
  14. ^ Hull, Robert F. (2010). The Story of the New Testament Text: Movers, Materials, Motives, Methods, and Models. Society of Biblical Lit. ISBN 978-1-58983-520-7.
  15. ^ a b Bengel, Johann Albrecht (1862). John Albert Bengel's Gnomon of the New Testament: Pointing Out from the Natural Force of the Words, the Simplicity, Depth, Harmony and Saving Power of Its Divine Thoughts. Perkinpine & Higgins.
  16. ^ "Acts 8 Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges". biblehub.com. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  17. ^ Keener, Craig S. (2013-10-15). Acts: An Exegetical Commentary : Volume 2: 3:1-14:28. Baker Academic. ISBN 978-1-4412-4039-2.
  18. ^ Becker, Siegbert W., Verbal Inspiration and the Variant Readings (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on September 30, 2015
  19. ^ Johnston, Peter J.; Green, Jay Patrick Sr (1992). Unholy Hands on the Bible: An Examination of the Six Major New Versions. Sovereign Grace Publishers. ISBN 978-1-878442-65-9.
  20. ^ Epp, Eldon Jay (2005-06-01). Perspectives on New Testament Textual Criticism: Collected Essays, 1962-2004. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-474-0695-2.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Confession_of_the_Ethiopian_Eunuch&oldid=1263863852"