Portal talk:Aviation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the portal about Aviation.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page.

For discussions about general portal development, please see the WikiProject Portals talk page.
If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list.

Archives: 1

This portal was identified as a featured portal before the process ended in 2017.

Portal milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2006	Featured portal candidate	Promoted

Portals

	This page is a portal. Portals are within the scope of WikiProject Portals, a collaborative effort to improve portals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortalsWikipedia:WikiProject PortalsTemplate:WikiProject PortalsPortals articles
???	This portal has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
???	This portal has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	See also: List of Portals
	This portal's subpages should be checked. Subpages that are no longer needed should be reported here. Please take care when editing, especially if using automated editing software. Learn how to update the maintenance information here. (June 2018)

Aviation

This page is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Policy of updating order&delivery information of airplanes

I'm aware of touching a sensitive matter :)

The current approach of most people seems to be waiting for publication of the monthly official Order&Delivery data on the according website of the manufacturer (Airbus and Boeing). I absolutely understand why this is the most desired way. It avoids the mess usually created by occasional editors who quickly raise a number and don't bother to update tables and graphs too. Leaving an inconsistent article and pulling their numbers from shady sources. Often not even able to distinguish between an announcement and an order.

On the other hand I also understand people who wonder about the fact that well known orders are not incorporated into Wikipedia for weeks. Or when people do so and others revert their edits it's probably often rather demotivating to have editing work disregarded sometimes without any comment on the reasons. And a third point - it does lead to inconsistency when for example a first machine is delivered (like in the recent case of the A320neo) which is of cause mentioned in the article but not reflected by the numbers in the same article where the delivery counter is still at 0.

My suggestion is the following:

Incorporate all new numbers which come from the manufacturer in press releases and the O&D.
Do a full update from O&D when published.
Mention this policy in the source of every article in question as a comment that people with good intentions won't get disappointed

Any thoughts on this? --Rabenkind (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews

Portal:Aviation/News/Wikinews has been deactivated and will not be updated by bot. The source page specified in the configuration is not properly configured. Please see User:JJMC89 bot/tasks/5 for proper configuration. — JJMC89 (T·C) 10:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Useless" Map

Hi, I need help: A nameless user always delete a map for the Prague airport, because of violation of guidlines that were supposedly discussed here, he mentioned. But I don't find anything like this here in the portal. What does he mean and what is the problem with the Map?
Discussion: Prague Airport Talk.
Thanks! CellarDoor85 (talk) 08:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the talk page for the Portal. Adding an image should not require a consensus, unless another image has to be removed to make room. Guidelines are at WP:AVIMOS and WP:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Maybe ask at WP:WikiProject Airports's talk page. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please help expand today's Kathmandy crash

US Bangla Airlines Flight 211

Status report from the Portals WikiProject

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals is back!

The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018.

Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, and design the portals of the future.

As of April 29th, membership is at 56 editors, and growing.

There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for each component of portals.

Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.

And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.

From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. — The Transhumanist 03:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vought Corsair

I think that the disambiguation page Vought Corsair should be moved to Vought Corsair (disambiguation) and the title changed into a redirect to Vought F4U Corsair. Its page views have an overwhelming edge over the earlier aircraft. The only question is how often the LTV A-7 Corsair II, reaching a similar dimension of page views, is labelled "Vought Corsair" without additions. I think the redirect would still be the better solution. Opinions? --KnightMove (talk) 08:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

red bull stunt crash pilot licencing revoked

is a pilot without certification still considered a pilot according to the FAA?

Trying to edit a page according to Wikipedia policy, but uncertain on this detail.

thanks in advance

SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)