Edit count of the user (user_editcount ) | 4 |
Name of the user account (user_name ) | 'Yonathanyeremy' |
Age of the user account (user_age ) | 172655 |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups ) | [
0 => '*',
1 => 'user'
] |
Global groups that the user is in (global_user_groups ) | [] |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile ) | false |
Page ID (page_id ) | 23834912 |
Page namespace (page_namespace ) | 0 |
Page title without namespace (page_title ) | 'Arithmetic topology' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle ) | 'Arithmetic topology' |
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors ) | [
0 => 'BG19bot',
1 => 'Solomon7968',
2 => 'Enyokoyama',
3 => 'David Eppstein',
4 => 'Brirush',
5 => '188.106.118.57',
6 => 'Yobot',
7 => 'Mistory',
8 => 'JohnBlackburne',
9 => 'Brad7777'
] |
First user to contribute to the page (page_first_contributor ) | 'Charvest' |
Action (action ) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary ) | '' |
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit ) | true |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext ) | ''''Arithmetic topology''' is an area of [[mathematics]] that is a combination of [[algebraic number theory]] and [[topology]]. It establishes an analogy between [[number field]]s and closed, orientable [[3-manifold]]s.
==Analogies==
The following are some of the analogies used by mathematicians between number fields and 3-manifolds:<ref>Sikora, Adam S. "Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields." Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 78.4 (2003): 832-844.</ref>
#A number field corresponds to a closed, orientable 3-manifold
#[[Ideal (ring theory)|Ideals]] in the ring of integers correspond to [[link (knot theory)|links]], and [[prime ideal]]s correspond to knots.
#The field '''Q''' of [[rational number]]s corresponds to the [[3-sphere]].
Expanding on the last two examples, there is an analogy between [[knot (mathematics)|knots]] and [[prime number]]s in which one considers "links" between primes. The triple of primes {{nowrap|(13, 61, 937)}} are "linked" modulo 2 (the [[Rédei symbol]] is −1) but are "pairwise unlinked" modulo 2 (the [[Legendre symbol]]s are all 1). Therefore these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2"<ref>{{Citation |last=Vogel |first=Denis |date=13 February 2004 |title=Massey products in the Galois cohomology of number fields |url=http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4418 |id={{URN|nbn|de:bsz:16-opus-44188}}}}</ref> or "mod 2 Borromean primes".<ref>{{Citation |last=Morishita |first=Masanori |date=22 April 2009 |title=Analogies between Knots and Primes, 3-Manifolds and Number Rings |arxiv=0904.3399}}</ref>
==History==
In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.
==See also==
*[[Arithmetic geometry]]
*[[Arithmetic dynamics]]
*[[Topological quantum field theory]]
*[[Langlands program]]
==Notes==
<references/>
==Further reading==
*Masanori Morishita (2011), [http://www.springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-1-4471-2157-2 Knots and Primes], Springer, ISBN 978-1-4471-2157-2
*Masanori Morishita (2009), [http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399v1 Analogies Between Knots And Primes, 3-Manifolds And Number Rings]
*Christopher Deninger (2002), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204274v1 A note on arithmetic topology and dynamical systems]
*Adam S. Sikora (2001), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0107210v2 Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields]
*[[Curtis T. McMullen]] (2003), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/papers/fermat/fermat.pdf From dynamics on surfaces to rational points on curves]
*Chao Li and Charmaine Sia (2012), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~sia/notes/knots_and_primes.pdf Knots and Primes]
==External links==
*[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/mazurs-dictionary Mazur’s knotty dictionary]
{{Number theory-footer}}
[[Category:Number theory]]
[[Category:3-manifolds]]
[[Category:Knot theory]]' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext ) | ''''Arithmetic topology''' is an area of [[mathematics]] that is a combination of [[algebraic number theory]] and [[topology]]. It establishes an analogy between [[number field]]s and closed, orientable [[3-manifold]]s.
==Analogies==
The following are some of the analogies used by mathematicians between number fields and 3-manifolds:<ref>Sikora, Adam S. "Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields." Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 78.4 (2003): 832-844.</ref>
#A number field corresponds to a closed, orientable 3-manifold
#[[Ideal (ring theory)|Ideals]] in the ring of integers correspond to [[link (knot theory)|links]], and [[prime ideal]]s correspond to knots.
#The field '''Q''' of [[rational number]]s corresponds to the [[3-sphere]].
Expanding on the last two examples, there is an analogy between [[knot (mathematics)|knots]] and [[prime number]]s in which one considers "links" between primes. The triple of primes {{nowrap|(13, 61, 937)}} are "linked" modulo 2 (the [[Rédei symbol]] is −1) but are "pairwise unlinked" modulo 2 (the [[Legendre symbol]]s are all 1). Therefore these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2"<ref>{{Citation |last=Vogel |first=Denis |date=13 February 2004 |title=Massey products in the Galois cohomology of number fields |url=http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4418 |id={{URN|nbn|de:bsz:16-opus-44188}}}}</ref> or "mod 2 Borromean primes".<ref>{{Citation |last=Morishita |first=Masanori |date=22 April 2009 |title=Analogies between Knots and Primes, 3-Manifolds and Number Rings |arxiv=0904.3399}}</ref>
==History==
In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.
==See also==
*[[Arithmetic geometry]]
*[[Arithmetic dynamics]]
*[[Langlands program]]
==Notes==
<references/>
==Further reading==
*Masanori Morishita (2011), [http://www.springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-1-4471-2157-2 Knots and Primes], Springer, ISBN 978-1-4471-2157-2
*Masanori Morishita (2009), [http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399v1 Analogies Between Knots And Primes, 3-Manifolds And Number Rings]
*Christopher Deninger (2002), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204274v1 A note on arithmetic topology and dynamical systems]
*Adam S. Sikora (2001), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0107210v2 Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields]
*[[Curtis T. McMullen]] (2003), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/papers/fermat/fermat.pdf From dynamics on surfaces to rational points on curves]
*Chao Li and Charmaine Sia (2012), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~sia/notes/knots_and_primes.pdf Knots and Primes]
==External links==
*[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/mazurs-dictionary Mazur’s knotty dictionary]
{{Number theory-footer}}
[[Category:Number theory]]
[[Category:3-manifolds]]
[[Category:Knot theory]]' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff ) | '@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@
==History==
-In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.
+In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.
==See also==
*[[Arithmetic geometry]]
*[[Arithmetic dynamics]]
-*[[Topological quantum field theory]]
*[[Langlands program]]
' |
New page size (new_size ) | 4331 |
Old page size (old_size ) | 4622 |
Size change in edit (edit_delta ) | -291 |
Lines added in edit (added_lines ) | [
0 => 'In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines ) | [
0 => 'In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.',
1 => '*[[Topological quantum field theory]]'
] |
All external links added in the edit (added_links ) | [] |
All external links in the new text (all_links ) | [
0 => 'http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4418',
1 => 'http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-opus-44188',
2 => '//arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399',
3 => 'http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf',
4 => 'http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html',
5 => 'http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf',
6 => 'http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf',
7 => 'http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/',
8 => 'http://www.springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-1-4471-2157-2',
9 => 'http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399v1',
10 => 'http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204274v1',
11 => 'http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0107210v2',
12 => 'http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/papers/fermat/fermat.pdf',
13 => 'http://www.math.harvard.edu/~sia/notes/knots_and_primes.pdf',
14 => 'http://www.neverendingbooks.org/mazurs-dictionary'
] |
Links in the page, before the edit (old_links ) | [
0 => '//arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399',
1 => '//arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399',
2 => 'http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf',
3 => 'http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399v1',
4 => 'http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0107210v2',
5 => 'http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204274v1',
6 => 'http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119',
7 => 'http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-opus-44188',
8 => 'http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf',
9 => 'http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/papers/fermat/fermat.pdf',
10 => 'http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf',
11 => 'http://www.math.harvard.edu/~sia/notes/knots_and_primes.pdf',
12 => 'http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html',
13 => 'http://www.neverendingbooks.org/mazurs-dictionary',
14 => 'http://www.springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-1-4471-2157-2',
15 => 'http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/',
16 => 'http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4418'
] |
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node ) | 0 |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp ) | 1460982061 |