User contributions for 142.177.46.232

7 January 2012

• 05:5205:52, 7 January 2012 diff hist +4,364 Talk:Athabasca oil sands some missing elements; name of article is not neutral, either historical name "Tar Sands" or a descriptive name ("bitumen deposits") is preferable
• 04:5704:57, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,860 User talk:Slakr The issue seems to be largely resolved, with User:Hyperionsteel agreeing to edit paragraph by paragraph rather than bald-reverting a lot of material
• 04:4804:48, 7 January 2012 diff hist +860 User talk:142.177.46.232 If one provides better sources to support the same language, it is not a revert.If the "work" being "undone" is itself a bald revert provided with no detail... undoing it is not a revert
• 04:4304:43, 7 January 2012 diff hist +581 Talk:Ezra Levant It's Wikipedia's language that must be neutral, and it's the source's facts that must be reliable. Don't confuse the two.
• 04:4004:40, 7 January 2012 diff hist +791 Talk:Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines major media source omitted; First Nations actual words unfairly removed, see http://savethefraser.ca
• 04:3604:36, 7 January 2012 diff hist +696 Kentville restoring === Electric utility (sold 1997) === and limiting statement about wisdom of the move to the fact that "No other municipal utility in Nova Scotia has ever offered its utility for sale."
• 04:3104:31, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,069 User talk:Hyperionsteel please review the sources of First Nations positions and read the actual "declaration" at Save The Fraser [http://savethefraser.ca].
• 04:2104:21, 7 January 2012 diff hist +272 User talk:Hyperionsteel It seems even racist and dismissive to censor out the First Nations' own chosen words w.r.t. Enbridge Northern Gateways Pipelines. Please review that edit. There are no words that anyone else could write that could express clearly what their po
• 04:1704:17, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,213 User talk:Hyperionsteel you are capable of more discernment than you are showing w.r.t. Ezra Levant, please read the sources thoroughly; on under-reported groups or stories, RS requirements are necessarily less stringent
• 04:0004:00, 7 January 2012 diff hist +914 Talk:Ezra Levant http://www.vancouverobserver.com/sustainability/2012/01/03/tory-linked-ethical-oil-website-slams-canadian-enviros-over-foreign documents Harper relationship, but more required (removed some text on this)
• 03:5703:57, 7 January 2012 diff hist +3,055 Ezra Levant removing statements lacking clear citation (see Talk:Ezra Levant) from neutral commentators; moderating language generally, deny there is undue emphasis here, CBC and ourdecision.ca are Levant's major projects
• 03:4303:43, 7 January 2012 diff hist +69 User talk:Hyperionsteel Add a "citation needed" tag to any statements you think require it.
• 03:4203:42, 7 January 2012 diff hist +168 User talk:Hyperionsteel ou should read Talk:Ezra Levant and review the detailed discussion of his links to Stephen Harper, the "ethical" rhetoric, and so on, before you edit this again.
• 03:4003:40, 7 January 2012 diff hist +886 User talk:Hyperionsteel →You have reverted twice to the same version. The tight timing indicates you have not read the sources provided in the second version. Please do so immediately and do not violate the three-revert rule.: new section
• 03:3903:39, 7 January 2012 diff hist +2,747 Ezra Levant revert; see Talk:Ezra_Levant, the external links prove this is not "original research", User:Hyperionsteel needs to review those before touching this article again
• 03:3603:36, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,403 Talk:Ezra Levant Removing the link to The Globe article referencing the Guardian is unwarranted. [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/worldview/canadas-ethical-oil-push-gets-tarred-in-british-papers/article2251918/]
• 03:3003:30, 7 January 2012 diff hist +2,747 Ezra Levant Harper uses Levant's front groups for astroturfing support for extremely controversial private sector projects such as Keystone XL and Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines, while publicly denying that he or the "Harper government" take
• 03:2203:22, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,818 Ezra Levant (edit summary removed)
• 01:4701:47, 7 January 2012 diff hist +119 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines linking First Nations / band names, these are all notable and require coverage / redirection for all common transcriptions (into English) of their names.
• 01:4501:45, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,375 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines the high tar sands output assumptions driving Northern Gateway do not take into account growing opposition in Alberta (Manning, Lougheed, etc.) to natural gas and fresh water use, and free dumping, which may restrict production and make NG redundant
• 01:3101:31, 7 January 2012 diff hist +867 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines The most direct competitor to Northern Gateway is Kinder Morgan's proposal to twin an existing pipeline from the Tar Sands to Vancouver to access the Pacific.
• 01:2601:26, 7 January 2012 diff hist +338 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines pro-pipeline pressure groups describing Canadians against the project as "local puppets" of "foreign interests", language echoed by Stephen Harper on January 6, 2012.
• 01:1901:19, 7 January 2012 diff hist +397 2013 British Columbia general election →Background: →Issues
• 01:1201:12, 7 January 2012 diff hist +913 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines By January 2012 over 4000 people had registered to be heard in the hearings, almost all of them intending to outline reasons to deny the project federal approval. - this number is rising - anyone got a more exact number or list of opponents?
• 01:0401:04, 7 January 2012 diff hist +2 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines copyedit to better order the issues
• 01:0201:02, 7 January 2012 diff hist +510 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines a pro-industry source that says Gateway is unnecessary
• 00:5300:53, 7 January 2012 diff hist +2,065 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines should this be described as a real viable project or as a pump and dump fraud intended to ensure approval of Keystone XL? everything credible suggests it has no chance whatsoever of being built or insured, even if its approved
• 00:4400:44, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,374 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines The project is less notable in technical terms than for the extreme controversy it ignites and its importance to geopolitics, biodiversity and climate change.
• 00:1900:19, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,350 Talk:Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines TransCanada, who is trying to build Keystone XL, has publicly said that Northern Gateway is far more controversial and divisive and dissed the project in public.
• 00:1200:12, 7 January 2012 diff hist +1,272 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines references on Colossal Fossil "award" and geopolitics.
• 00:0300:03, 7 January 2012 diff hist +815 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines Global opposition to '''Northern Gateway''' is based not only on threats to water but to diplomatic accords on climate and acidification.

6 January 2012

• 23:5423:54, 6 January 2012 diff hist +2,255 Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines update December 2011, noting declared companies in support, specific First Nations opposition statements (with quotes and references)
• 20:1720:17, 6 January 2012 diff hist +339 Kentville →Electric utility (sold 1997): add link, note conssensus and its justification.
• 20:1220:12, 6 January 2012 diff hist +1,072 Kentville no other municipal utility in Nova Scotia has ever considered following Kentville's lead and selling a town-owned utility. suggests the consensus of the informed is that it's a bad idea and Kentville made an error