Jump to content

User contributions for 144.32.240.129

Results for 144.32.240.129 talk block log logs global block log filter log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:4918:49, 12 January 2022 diff hist −1,043 Eternalism (philosophy of time) →The present: assumption not fully supported by sources, in fact the beginning statement seems to not have a source at all, and the overall contribution seems to not be too impactful to the article as it seems somewhat unrelated

14:1914:19, 8 October 2021 diff hist +409 Talk:Simulation hypothesis →Why the 'Simulation hypothesis in physic' section should be removed
12:2612:26, 8 October 2021 diff hist +277 Talk:Simulation hypothesis →Why the 'Simulation hypothesis in physic' section should be removed
12:1812:18, 8 October 2021 diff hist +655 Talk:Simulation hypothesis →Why the 'Simulation hypothesis in physic' section should be removed
12:1312:13, 8 October 2021 diff hist +13,175 Simulation hypothesis Undid revision 1048862561 by 144.32.240.129 (talk ) just saw the discussion sorry Tag: Undo
12:1212:12, 8 October 2021 diff hist −13,175 Simulation hypothesis Undid revision 1048861207 by Randy Kryn (talk) I’m not trying to vandalise, there is genuine sincerity for why I believe this should be removed or at least heavily altered. I’ve started the discussion of this on the talk page Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

22:2922:29, 7 October 2021 diff hist −13,175 Simulation hypothesis I’ve read the ‘simulation hypothesis in physics’ section many times and it just doesn’t seem to be a contribution with much weight behind it: it’s speculative assertions with great leaps in logic with no evidence behind them besides, well, speculation. Asserting that these aspects may be because of simulation hypothesis really makes it seem like God of the gaps thinking which is playing around with pseudoscience. The section should be removed. Tags: Reverted section blanking

14:5314:53, 4 May 2018 diff hist −5 Barry and Fran Weissler No edit summary

21:2721:27, 14 March 2018 diff hist −68 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
21:2521:25, 14 March 2018 diff hist −5 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
21:2421:24, 14 March 2018 diff hist +30 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
21:2321:23, 14 March 2018 diff hist +15 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation Tag: repeating characters
21:2021:20, 14 March 2018 diff hist +6 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
17:2917:29, 14 March 2018 diff hist −7 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
17:2717:27, 14 March 2018 diff hist +7 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
17:2717:27, 14 March 2018 diff hist +4 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation
17:2517:25, 14 March 2018 diff hist 0 Solar rotation →Surface rotation as an equation

14:1814:18, 29 January 2018 diff hist +43 Santiago Cordero No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13:2913:29, 21 February 2017 diff hist +82 March 25 No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13:5413:54, 1 October 2016 diff hist −13 Charli XCX →2015–present: Upcoming third studio album and Vroom Vroom Recordings

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/144.32.240.129"