User contributions for 158.81.251.201

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

19:3419:34, 21 April 2009 diff hist −7 List of inscriptions in biblical archaeology →Artifacts described but unknown to exist: that they are described in context with many things that have been found provides some prima facie evidence of existence, that's needlessly leading

16:1616:16, 5 February 2009 diff hist +60 Marla Olmstead If it's unclear that she did them, talking categorically about 'her skill' is pretty silly
16:0816:08, 5 February 2009 diff hist +243 Marla Olmstead →Controversy
16:0116:01, 5 February 2009 diff hist +2 Marla Olmstead →Present
15:5115:51, 5 February 2009 diff hist +49 Marla Olmstead →Early life: Again the claims she painted all these are obviously both controversial and unverified, there's no reason the language shouldn't be consistent
15:4915:49, 5 February 2009 diff hist +14 Marla Olmstead It's pretty clear that claims she painted many works sold under her name are controversial, therefore the language should be similarly circumspect throughout.

19:5719:57, 2 February 2009 diff hist +886 Talk:Quakers →not quite true about individual mysticism: new section
19:5119:51, 2 February 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Quakers No edit summary
19:5119:51, 2 February 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Quakers →discussion of 'nontheism' in inrto is misleading
19:5019:50, 2 February 2009 diff hist +1,319 Talk:Quakers →discussion of 'nontheism' in inrto is misleading: new section
19:3119:31, 2 February 2009 diff hist −4 Ann Lee →Rise to prominence: it's clear she claimed these things (to my knowledge) unsupported by any other source, sceptism or credulity is generally for the reader to apply.
19:2819:28, 2 February 2009 diff hist −174 Shakers →Works of art derived from the Shaker experience: That's really not an evangeical christian teaching at all, with the usual evangelical focus on salvation through faith, it's almost the opposite
19:2619:26, 2 February 2009 diff hist +20 Shakers →Shaker music
19:2019:20, 2 February 2009 diff hist −122 Shakers →Communal spiritual family: Odd anti-natalist aside there, presumably one can be 'distracted' by any number of other things, any number of groups practicing sexual equality weren't celibate, non?
19:1719:17, 2 February 2009 diff hist +2,243 Talk:Shakers No edit summary

20:5120:51, 28 January 2009 diff hist +82 His Dark Materials Someone apparently wanted examples of negative portrayal? I should think naming your fictional boogey-men with a term for the catholic church suffices for at least one sufficient example.
20:4420:44, 28 January 2009 diff hist −37 His Dark Materials See the discussion page for the explanation and evidence for this edit, the claim being removed wasn't supported by the source anyway (if you bother to read it).
20:4120:41, 28 January 2009 diff hist +521 Talk:His Dark Materials →distorting a classic author
16:1816:18, 28 January 2009 diff hist −2,829 Talk:His Dark Materials No edit summary
16:1716:17, 28 January 2009 diff hist +2,830 Talk:His Dark Materials No edit summary
16:1316:13, 28 January 2009 diff hist −10 Human cannibalism →Early modern era: You have 'savages' in quotes already, no need for 'so called' also. The article is replete with trendy colonial guilt anyway, is one PC buzz word per clause not enough?

21:0821:08, 21 January 2009 diff hist −2 John Shelby Spong →Writings: saying he 'explains' that he is a christian really begs the question, rather he 'argues' he is, a claim met with various degrees of credulity by the christian community at large
21:0321:03, 21 January 2009 diff hist −37 John Shelby Spong →Writings: no need for obfuscating po-mo speak, 'rejects the historical truth claims' means rejects the doctrines because the doctrines themselves consist largely of 'historical truth claims'