User contributions for 174.28.162.94

20 January 2012

• 10:5310:53, 20 January 2012 diff hist +587 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 10:2210:22, 20 January 2012 diff hist +14 User talk:Jakew No edit summary
• 09:0609:06, 20 January 2012 diff hist +840 Circumcision →Sexual effects: Added citations from a secondary review article. Feel free to fix the content or discuss instead of quickly pressing the undo over any perceived slight.
• 08:0408:04, 20 January 2012 diff hist +770 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 07:3007:30, 20 January 2012 diff hist +408 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 07:2907:29, 20 January 2012 diff hist +442 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 07:1907:19, 20 January 2012 diff hist +8 Circumcision No edit summary
• 07:1107:11, 20 January 2012 diff hist +12 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 07:1007:10, 20 January 2012 diff hist +453 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 06:5506:55, 20 January 2012 diff hist +267 User talk:Garycompugeek →current lead
• 06:4806:48, 20 January 2012 diff hist +723 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 06:3706:37, 20 January 2012 diff hist +89 Talk:Circumcision →Recent additions
• 06:3606:36, 20 January 2012 diff hist +2,460 Talk:Circumcision →Recent additions
• 06:2406:24, 20 January 2012 diff hist +2,545 Talk:Circumcision →Primary research
• 06:0206:02, 20 January 2012 diff hist +427 User talk:Doc James →Edit warring: new section
• 05:4405:44, 20 January 2012 diff hist +1,860 Circumcision →Sexual effects: Fixed "Strongly suggests". Primary sources are allowed if they describe the conclusion of the report clearly. See Wikipedia:MEDRS.
• 05:3105:31, 20 January 2012 diff hist +227 User talk:Beejaypii →November 2011
• 05:2105:21, 20 January 2012 diff hist −663 Circumcision "evidence strongly suggests"? That's a Wikipedia editor's conclusion. Please see WP:NOR, WP:NPOV. Tag: references removed
• 05:1605:16, 20 January 2012 diff hist +51 Circumcision Undid revision 472150456 by Jayjg (talk) Please review WP:NOR. This is not original research. If you disagree let be reasonable and go to dispute resolution.

19 January 2012

• 20:1520:15, 19 January 2012 diff hist +1,904 Circumcision →Sexual effects: Added sources describing female dryness associated with circumcised partners.
• 20:0820:08, 19 January 2012 diff hist −494 Sexual effects of circumcision →Female preferences and response: I looked up the source to find the citation, and it does not support the statement. I am removing it. If you feel I made an error, feel free to add it back with the proper source. (It's not Boyle 2001). Tag: references removed
• 19:3719:37, 19 January 2012 diff hist +2 Sexual effects of circumcision →Female preferences and response
• 19:3219:32, 19 January 2012 diff hist +852 Talk:Sexual effects of circumcision →POV Tag reasons
• 19:2219:22, 19 January 2012 diff hist +109 Sexual effects of circumcision →Female preferences and response: Changed citation to include analysis method (survey) and its reported results leading to authors conclusion. Including methodology and data is essential to allow readers to judge authors conclusion.
• 16:4916:49, 19 January 2012 diff hist +51 Circumcision Undid revision Jakew (talk) This is not original research. Its a summary of the article and data which is encouraged in wikipedia. This was a point made by the author and quantified by his table.