User contributions for 189.17.136.67

25 March 2011

• 18:5318:53, 25 March 2011 diff hist +263 User talk:Brewcrewer No edit summary
• 13:0813:08, 25 March 2011 diff hist −26 Gilad Shalit No edit summary Tag: references removed
• 12:5812:58, 25 March 2011 diff hist +11 Gilad Shalit Not gunmen. Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades is a militant group. Also, Ehud and Eldad were dead when their bodies were taken.
• 12:5312:53, 25 March 2011 diff hist 0 Gilad Shalit No edit summary
• 12:5212:52, 25 March 2011 diff hist −7 Gilad Shalit No edit summary
• 12:4812:48, 25 March 2011 diff hist +89 Talk:Gilad Shalit →Hostage
• 12:4612:46, 25 March 2011 diff hist +630 Talk:Gilad Shalit →Phrasing
• 12:4312:43, 25 March 2011 diff hist +527 Talk:Gilad Shalit →Hostage
• 12:3412:34, 25 March 2011 diff hist −1,167 User talk:189.17.136.67 I DID provide an edit summary.
• 12:3312:33, 25 March 2011 diff hist −192 Gilad Shalit Civil means nothing. The talk page says nothing about the word "captured". Tag: references removed
• 12:3212:32, 25 March 2011 diff hist +358 User talk:Maher-shalal-hashbaz →I suggest you actually reads the talk page before sending me a retarded sandbox message: new section
• 12:2912:29, 25 March 2011 diff hist −192 Gilad Shalit Look at this talk page, buddy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gilad_Shalit#Hostage Where does it say that the word "captured" is not allowed? It certainly says the word "hostage" is not allowed but nothing else. So fuck off. Tag: references removed
• 12:2412:24, 25 March 2011 diff hist +428 User talk:Brewcrewer →I'm not Jew baiting
• 12:2012:20, 25 March 2011 diff hist +1 Gilad Shalit No edit summary
• 12:1912:19, 25 March 2011 diff hist −1 Gilad Shalit Adding source for the word "captured". Tag: references removed
• 12:1812:18, 25 March 2011 diff hist −192 Gilad Shalit No, it did NOT. The consensus was on the word "hostage". Nothing else. The links on this page all use the word CAPTURED. So fuck off, you biased editor. We can do this all year. It won't change the fact that you are wrong and I am right.

21 March 2011

• 18:3318:33, 21 March 2011 diff hist +598 User talk:Brewcrewer No edit summary
• 17:4917:49, 21 March 2011 diff hist +7 Gilad Shalit Reverting biased opinion. And I'm not Jew baiting. I'm not a racist. I'm just saying that you and other Jewish editors love to refer Gilad as "kidnapped" and "abduction". That's false. He's a SOLDIER. He was CAPTURED in a TANK in BATTLE. Fuck off.
• 13:5213:52, 21 March 2011 diff hist +7 Gilad Shalit CAPTURED. HE'S A SOLDIER! Why are all you Jewish editors biased?