User contributions for 190.46.95.25

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

01:2401:24, 21 November 2011 diff hist −9 Cosmic dust →Dust grain formation: putting stuff in brackets implies that it is not that important and breaks up the flow of the sentence. Everything here in brackets was certainly important and needed to be incorporated in the flow.
01:0901:09, 21 November 2011 diff hist −309 Hermann Fegelein For fuck's sake. Don't revert for no good reason. Do you understand why it pisses people off if their efforts are reverted for no good reason? Did you take the time to read my summaries which explain why these edits were necessary? Tag: references removed

23:2523:25, 20 November 2011 diff hist +751 User talk:Kierzek →Don't revert for no good reason: new section
23:2423:24, 20 November 2011 diff hist −309 Hermann Fegelein restored my improvements. don't revert for no good reason. Tag: references removed
23:1623:16, 20 November 2011 diff hist −20 Downfall (2004 film) It's obvious. It does not need stating. readers are not retards.
03:1403:14, 20 November 2011 diff hist −23 Goebbels children →Death: you're not citing the name of the author. You're citing the facts. Put citations after facts, not before.
01:5501:55, 20 November 2011 diff hist −74 Hermann Fegelein →Death: so what if it was written in 1947?
01:5401:54, 20 November 2011 diff hist −103 Hermann Fegelein →Death: again, relevant text should be in the article, not buried in a footnote.
01:5201:52, 20 November 2011 diff hist −327 Hermann Fegelein →Awards: no reason to put relevant text in a footnote, and also no need to duplicate what is already in the article. Tag: references removed
01:4201:42, 20 November 2011 diff hist −20 Downfall (2004 film) no need to state the obvious

17:0417:04, 19 November 2011 diff hist 0 The Crucified Soldier →Sergeant Harry Band: why on earth would you think it's the word "developed" that requires a citation? It's the whole fact, not just a random verb within the fact, that is being cited.
16:5016:50, 19 November 2011 diff hist +107 Soviet War Memorial (Treptower Park) confusion is unlikely, so there is no need to patronise by warning against it.
16:1116:11, 19 November 2011 diff hist +1 Leopoldo Galtieri →Falklands War: grammar
16:0916:09, 19 November 2011 diff hist −6 Leopoldo Galtieri →Falklands War: no need to bold
02:5902:59, 19 November 2011 diff hist −469 Sundowner (band) rm promo links