User contributions for 2.39.188.155

2 May 2016

• 16:3216:32, 2 May 2016 diff hist +104 Fascism Inserting well-sourced facts instead of blatant victmistic BS

29 April 2016

• 18:1518:15, 29 April 2016 diff hist +288 Talk:Fascism →D'Annunzio and Slavs

28 April 2016

• 21:4821:48, 28 April 2016 diff hist +104 Fascism I did read the revision summary and there's already a talk going on. I left a message and had no response.
• 20:5120:51, 28 April 2016 diff hist +617 Talk:Fascism →D'Annunzio and Slavs
• 20:3420:34, 28 April 2016 diff hist +104 Fascism I'll tell you only another time, D'Annunzio and his men did not "aggress Slavs" (Fascists, ops, I mean, the Fascist regime did, LATER). They took an Italian-populated land and did not hurt anyone but the International Force, as you can verify yourself.
• 20:1920:19, 28 April 2016 diff hist +148 National Fascist Party Yeah, I know - claiming Italian-populated lands should be part of Italy was clearly ABSURD on their part! Why do you mix up Imperialism and Irredentism? Why depicting such an objective as imperialistic aims towards the poor Slavs?
• 20:1420:14, 28 April 2016 diff hist −142 Italy–Yugoslavia relations →Border in Dalmatia
• 20:1220:12, 28 April 2016 diff hist +155 Italy–Yugoslavia relations That year, yes
• 20:1020:10, 28 April 2016 diff hist +8 Italy–Yugoslavia relations Yeah yeah Kottor Kottor
• 20:0920:09, 28 April 2016 diff hist +104 Fascism Omitting facts is an odious sin; deliberately lying is even worse. D'Annunzio and his men did not "aggress" any fucking South Slavs. They took Italian Fiume and that was it, ON THEIR PART. What happened later doesn't fit here.
• 20:0520:05, 28 April 2016 diff hist +249 1919 in Italy Yes please, let us state facts, no? :) Eja, eja, alalà!