User contributions for 203.117.10.66
Appearance
Results for 203.117.10.66 talk block log logs global block log filter log
30 September 2011
- 03:5903:59, 30 September 2011 diff hist +427 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 02:4302:43, 30 September 2011 diff hist +70 ODB++ Note on database
- 02:3102:31, 30 September 2011 diff hist +61 ODB++ correction and added ref. ODB++ and RS-274X have about the same age
- 00:4300:43, 30 September 2011 diff hist +295 ODB++ Pointer to specification
- 00:2600:26, 30 September 2011 diff hist +760 Talk:ODB++ About "Access to the ODB++ and ODB++(X) specifications seems to be quite restricted."
29 September 2011
- 01:1301:13, 29 September 2011 diff hist +309 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 00:4300:43, 29 September 2011 diff hist +473 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
28 September 2011
- 17:2917:29, 28 September 2011 diff hist +984 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 16:4016:40, 28 September 2011 diff hist −33 ODB++ Make statement about 274x factual
- 16:3816:38, 28 September 2011 diff hist −4 ODB++ typo
- 16:3716:37, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,470 ODB++ Remove advocay again, add link to specification Tag: references removed
- 16:3216:32, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,736 ODB++ Remoce advocay. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion Tag: references removed
- 16:2516:25, 28 September 2011 diff hist +570 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 16:0416:04, 28 September 2011 diff hist +230 ODB++ Add link to spec, remove ref with blatant advocay
- 15:5415:54, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2,712 ODB++ Remove "advocacy" and publicity. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia, not a forum to promote causes, however worthy Tag: section blanking
27 September 2011
- 13:1213:12, 27 September 2011 diff hist +93 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 00:2600:26, 27 September 2011 diff hist +576 Talk:ODB++ One more attempt to enter in discussion with Woz2
26 September 2011
- 23:1923:19, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,784 ODB++ Undid revision 452599506 by Woz2 Restore version without publicity Tag: references removed
- 23:1823:18, 26 September 2011 diff hist +416 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 22:4922:49, 26 September 2011 diff hist +139 Talk:ODB++ Spec?
- 22:3922:39, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,784 ODB++ Still no reply to my arguments on the talks page. Removed publicity again. Wikipedia is not a commercial tool. Tag: references removed
- 18:0718:07, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ Undid revision 452555879 by Aranea Mortem (talk) This wst ''not'' a minor edit. Restored neutral version. Tag: references removed
- 17:5517:55, 26 September 2011 diff hist +397 User talk:Aranea Mortem →ODB++: new section
- 17:3417:34, 26 September 2011 diff hist −266 Bayesian inference Shorter
- 17:1117:11, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ Undid revision 452535069 by Woz2 (talk) Remove commercial publicity Tag: references removed
- 17:0317:03, 26 September 2011 diff hist +572 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 14:4014:40, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,739 ODB++ So called references in this section were blatant publicity for Mentor and/or Artwork Tag: references removed
- 14:0514:05, 26 September 2011 diff hist +78 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 13:3113:31, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,921 ODB++ Biased. Does not contribute to the article
- 13:2913:29, 26 September 2011 diff hist +257 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 13:2413:24, 26 September 2011 diff hist +583 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 12:4412:44, 26 September 2011 diff hist +382 Talk:ODB++ No edit summary
- 12:3812:38, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,879 ODB++ Undid revision 452511165 by Woz2 (talk) Biased. Sneak publicity. Lists only some EDA companies. Contributes nothing to understanding ODB++
- 11:2511:25, 26 September 2011 diff hist −1,880 ODB++ Wikipedia policy is to be neutral. See Wikipedia content criteria. You sneak in publicity for one or other company. And it does not contribute to understanding what ODB++ is.
- 10:3410:34, 26 September 2011 diff hist +857 ODB++ Sorry, I removed a par by mistake. I hereby restore it
- 10:2910:29, 26 September 2011 diff hist −2,739 ODB++ Citing some companies that support ODB++ violates neutrality. Furthermore, it does not contribute to understanding what ODB++ is Tag: section blanking
23 August 2010
- 16:3616:36, 23 August 2010 diff hist −15 Lise Mayer No edit summary