User contributions for 208.1.104.78

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

14:2914:29, 24 February 2009 diff hist +19 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation →Terrorism: , again there is an attempt to connect "terrorism" with OIC. The OIC support palestinians, but some westerners are putting their bias and calling it "terrorism"
14:2614:26, 24 February 2009 diff hist −154 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Again DON'T add your POV. it is alleged antisemitism because the accused party denies it. Also the US state department does NOT speak for the whole world, there is western criticism, not internal
00:0900:09, 24 February 2009 diff hist +133 American-Islamic Forum for Democracy No edit summary

21:2321:23, 23 February 2009 diff hist +3 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation don't add your POV, it is alleged antisemitism because the accused party denies it.

02:5202:52, 22 February 2009 diff hist +9 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation →Antisemitism: the title should be changed to alledged, because Muslim leaders deny they are "antisemetic"
02:1602:16, 22 February 2009 diff hist −6 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation as I said the Us state department does NOT speak for the whole world. the reference only gives the views of Americans and some western countries
02:1302:13, 22 February 2009 diff hist −6 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation →Antisemitism: Western reaction is not the same as International reaction. US state department does Not speak for the whole international community

08:3708:37, 15 February 2009 diff hist −29 Salman Rushdie there is no such thing as a "muslim athiest", just like there is no such thing as a "christian athiest". how can an athiest be a Muslim ? its an oxymoron

14:4114:41, 14 February 2009 diff hist +457 Lulu Schwartz Undid revision 270637858 by Thivierr (talk)
01:0201:02, 14 February 2009 diff hist +438 Lulu Schwartz this is a more balanced article
00:2100:21, 14 February 2009 diff hist +19 Lulu Schwartz the article should be from a neutral point of view, it should not become the tool to spread neoconservative ideology.

16:5116:51, 11 February 2009 diff hist −41 Muslim Students Association "muslim brotherhood" comment has no refrence. MSA is a student club for Muslim students, it has no political ideology related to the "muslim brotherhood"
16:2216:22, 11 February 2009 diff hist +7 Lulu Schwartz I deleted the "wahabi " comment, because this guy is against mainsteam Muslims too like against CAIR and ISNA, which can hardly be called "wahabi" when they are run by women and moderate converts

01:1501:15, 9 February 2009 diff hist −4 Lulu Schwartz No edit summary
01:1401:14, 9 February 2009 diff hist +13 Lulu Schwartz ok so we have a compromise, I put that he claims to be a muslim. and he is against conservative Islam, because of his attacks on CAIR, because of his neocon views

19:0819:08, 8 February 2009 diff hist −106 Lulu Schwartz stephen schwartz is a Jew, and that link saying that he is a "practising Muslim" is to a website that is run by him !! not a credible refrence
19:0319:03, 8 February 2009 diff hist 0 Islam in the United States stephen schwartz is jewish

00:5100:51, 3 February 2009 diff hist +14 Faith Freedom International the article on the website called "jew watch" is also listed as hate. There is no difference between jew watch and this website, they both promote hate

01:1301:13, 2 February 2009 diff hist −4 Irshad Manji No edit summary
01:1301:13, 2 February 2009 diff hist +6 Irshad Manji the word "radical" is a biased word. "radical" just means it is too different from the author's views. One man's radical is another man's normal/appropriate

03:2103:21, 13 December 2008 diff hist −3 Godhra train burning according to the Indian government the fire was an accident and the hindu fanatics on wikipedia are falsely saying muslims were the mob without any quotation