User contributions for 2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4

This IP address is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

02:49, 27 June 2024 Risker talk contribs changed block settings for 2401:4900::/32 talk with an expiration time of 01:10, 17 April 2026 (anon. only, account creation blocked) ({{rangeblock}}: )

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

06:1606:16, 9 December 2020 diff hist +16 Samrat Prithviraj Undid revison: Dont Spread hate on every Rajput related Page also This Version was added by Senior Editor Flyndfotbersek on 3 december quoting to add Film based citations instead of Historical And 5 citation are added that he will be Rajput Please see versiom by User Flynfotbersek He said We should add fim based citations about Charcater and there are 5 citations for Same Anyway U hate rajput Find another hobby. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
06:1306:13, 9 December 2020 diff hist +648 User talk:Sungpeshwe9 →Prithviraj Chauhan Page: Bye message Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
06:0806:08, 9 December 2020 diff hist +455 User talk:Sungpeshwe9 →Prithviraj Chauhan Page Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
06:0406:04, 9 December 2020 diff hist +430 User talk:Sungpeshwe9 →Prithviraj Chauhan Page: Book Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
06:0006:00, 9 December 2020 diff hist +893 User talk:Sungpeshwe9 →December 2020 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:5305:53, 9 December 2020 diff hist +4 Rathore dynasty Fix ups Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:4905:49, 9 December 2020 diff hist +84 Rathore dynasty Adidng name of Rao Simha who establish Rathore clan in 1230 in Marwar Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:4805:48, 9 December 2020 diff hist +853 Talk:Rathore dynasty →Ancestry Claims Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:4305:43, 9 December 2020 diff hist +3 Rathore dynasty No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:4205:42, 9 December 2020 diff hist −298 Rathore dynasty No edit summary Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:4205:42, 9 December 2020 diff hist +149 Rathore dynasty →Further reading: Adding book: Donot Present Enough evidences,How on Earth u Said that ???? Jadunath Sarkar work is quoted on Page 28 and 29 in Notes Section While Sharma work is directly mentioned on given pg number Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:3905:39, 9 December 2020 diff hist −164 Rathore dynasty Readding GN Sharma work: What Are u Upto I add Gn sharma work A Legendary scholar from Rajasthan And calling his work as Original search or Jn Sarkars work Nonsense Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:3605:36, 9 December 2020 diff hist +31 Rathore dynasty →Further reading: Rv: Neither Sarkar book of 1960 said about Claim he said Gahdavalas were Rathores Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:3405:34, 9 December 2020 diff hist −1,489 Rathore dynasty Rv: Original Reasearch ??? This Is Work of Jadunath Sarkar and Dasrath Sharma which mentions clearly about Rathores none of ur source mentiom about Rathores,Also Stop Ur agenda even if others are giving high quality sourced which mention Rathores Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:1905:19, 9 December 2020 diff hist −7 Rana Sanga Good-Faith edits: Quite unnescsary Castecruft, To Be Fair Sissodia,Chauhan,Rathore,Pamras etc are Subgroup of Rajputs.and on Sissdodia page it is well mentioned About Them being Rajput. Also its quite understood that Sanga was a Rajput no need to add Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit

9 December 2020