User contributions for 2600:1012:B006:A614:2467:EB73:72C:E4CC
Appearance
Results for 2600:1012:B006:A614:2467:EB73:72C:E4CC talk block log logs global block log filter log
Changes newer than 11 seconds may not appear in this list.
22 August 2021
- 20:1520:15, 22 August 2021 diff hist +214 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Constitutional legal challenge: hopefully not wp:crystal: from article "Although it’s impossible to predict how courts will rule, many experts say the current recall process has long survived legal challenges, and probably would again, even if a fringe candidate won on Sept. 14 and became governor with a minority of overall votes." important info considering partisan legitimacy claim right when people are voting, ppl got kicked off the internet for doing the same thing last year
- 19:5519:55, 22 August 2021 diff hist +688 Talk:2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Sorting articles by funds
- 19:4619:46, 22 August 2021 diff hist +820 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Ok in the meantime, let's let this unobtrusive note remain, because scng isn't well known, and readers may not know if their paper endorsed anything Undid revision 1040122501 by SecretName101 (talk)
21 August 2021
- 21:4021:40, 21 August 2021 diff hist −32 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Qualified candidates: Thanks for adding this table by the way, Dhalsim2. It looks absolutely fantastic. I am de-linking this because i'd like only labels with proper nouns to have links...we could have a slippery slope leading to overlinking if we start picking and choosing
- 21:3221:32, 21 August 2021 diff hist +30 Brooks Brothers →Notable customers: This one has some issues too
- 21:2921:29, 21 August 2021 diff hist +141 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Endorsements: fix cite
- 21:2121:21, 21 August 2021 diff hist −1 Kevin Kiley (politician) TFA is a two yr commitment, so "retired" seems out of place
- 21:1721:17, 21 August 2021 diff hist −2 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Endorsements: outline format
- 21:1421:14, 21 August 2021 diff hist +463 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Endorsements: Given that we have lone individual endorsers using up this much space, it seems fine to expand in this manner on endorsements for papers w over 3 million readership.
- 20:4920:49, 21 August 2021 diff hist +284 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Undid revision 1039953314 by Prcc27 (talk) read the fine print orgs vs individuals, this is fine i think Tag: Undo
- 19:5019:50, 21 August 2021 diff hist +289 Tina Tchen →Career: add times up hypocrisy w cuomo victims. page is still missing her role in jesse smellit case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:1317:13, 21 August 2021 diff hist −2,948 User talk:2600:1012:B006:A614:2467:EB73:72C:E4CC ←Blanked the page current Tag: Blanking
- 16:2516:25, 21 August 2021 diff hist +1,052 User talk:Pitzzaboy →Editing on election pages: new section
- 16:0816:08, 21 August 2021 diff hist −446 User talk:2600:1012:B006:A614:2467:EB73:72C:E4CC →Editing 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 15:4515:45, 21 August 2021 diff hist +9 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Background: "at least"
- 15:4115:41, 21 August 2021 diff hist −253 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Undid revision 1039919427 by Pitzzaboy (talk) Stop. Don't make this edit again. It's favoritism, because it isn't a race between just Elder and Newsom. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 15:2715:27, 21 August 2021 diff hist −3 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Undid revision 1039918825 by 174.193.131.3 (talk) not ilprovemdnt Tags: Undo Reverted
- 06:1906:19, 21 August 2021 diff hist +132 2020 California Proposition 22 →Litigation: replace wp:crystal with the hard stuff, copyediting
- 05:5405:54, 21 August 2021 diff hist +1 Section 230 fix error Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:5305:53, 21 August 2021 diff hist +6 Section 230 copyedit, also re: previous edit, the quote was already mentioned in the body of the article. combining the redundancy, apparent negative impact of quotes in the lede per previous reverter, and unchecked loaded language, that deletion was a no brainer Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:3005:30, 21 August 2021 diff hist +14 Brooks Brothers →Clothing innovations: I admit I know little about open casket etiquette, and this is tagged as OR anyway, but this was weird enough, had to fix Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:0405:04, 21 August 2021 diff hist −139 Section 230 delete undesirable quote from lede, little value to article, just restates what was previously said. replace loaded word wp:words
- 04:5304:53, 21 August 2021 diff hist −253 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Stop. If you're under the influence, please don't operate heavy machinery or vehicles, but please don't do this low level trolling either. Find something else to do. Tag: Reverted
- 04:4504:45, 21 August 2021 diff hist +224 User talk:Pitzzaboy →Edit warring: new section
- 04:3904:39, 21 August 2021 diff hist −250 2021 California gubernatorial recall election Undid revision 1039850456 by Pitzzaboy (talk) there is a discussion on the talk page to add photos to the candidate section, not even up above here. we eliminated pictures because of the potential for favoritism...we are either going to include photos for every candidate we can, or none of them. this is blatant favoritism, and it also technically is wrong, because there is no gop nominee, let alone endorsement Tag: Undo
- 04:3404:34, 21 August 2021 diff hist −250 2021 California gubernatorial recall election he isn't a nominee, this is a special election. even if he is "frontrunner" (not all polls say so). please no pictures unless you can provide pics for every candidate for whom they are available Undid revision 1039848185 by 2601:643:8300:A4B0:1915:6BB5:7905:1F6 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 03:2403:24, 21 August 2021 diff hist −21 2021 California gubernatorial recall election →Background: verbose
20 August 2021
- 23:5323:53, 20 August 2021 diff hist +361 Section 230 add bupartisan criticism Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit