User contributions for 2601:246:C700:19D:A893:D336:57FE:E91C

8 January 2020

• 22:2422:24, 8 January 2020 diff hist +733 User talk:Catiekirk →Notes 2 current
• 22:1622:16, 8 January 2020 diff hist 0 Olivia Gatwood →Personal life: Since this URL was just visited, and the information still appears at the site, we can presume it is still correct. But, this self-published is still not a good source.
• 22:1522:15, 8 January 2020 diff hist −6 Olivia Gatwood →Further reading: Copy edit. Removing stray markup where it did not belong.
• 22:1422:14, 8 January 2020 diff hist −23 Olivia Gatwood →Career: Can remove this one section tag, since we found where all the unsourced material came from.
• 22:1322:13, 8 January 2020 diff hist +14 Olivia Gatwood Thanks in advance to the ReFill team, for filling these to standard. Please use ReFill variant that gives access-date field, as well as title, etc. Cheers.
• 22:1222:12, 8 January 2020 diff hist +339 Olivia Gatwood Provided the sources to thre poems in the Selected section. Found the source of all the promotional information in the Career section, and since it was plagiarised, I swapped in a blockquote of the source content. It does not belong here, but having it is not as bad as hafing it and suggesting a reliable source by omitting the inline citations. Setting up other incomplete citations for checking and filling by the ReFill team. Cheers, there, thanks.
• 21:4721:47, 8 January 2020 diff hist −251 Olivia Gatwood →Life of the Party: Copy edit, punctuation, and checking source. First source was to a song lyrics cite, and was removed. Second sentence checks to source, but is incomplete, and so was setup for filling by ReFill. Tag: references removed
• 21:4221:42, 8 January 2020 diff hist +382 Olivia Gatwood →New American Best Friend: Copy edited section (removing "ones one" for instance), and noted the recurring violations of WP:VERIFY. Please, this artist is due the respect, of creating and maintaining an encyclopedic article. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
• 21:3421:34, 8 January 2020 diff hist +23 Olivia Gatwood →Select poems: Noting the need to source the poems.
• 21:3321:33, 8 January 2020 diff hist +5 Olivia Gatwood →Personal life: Fixed errant markup regarding place of residence.
• 21:3221:32, 8 January 2020 diff hist +187 Olivia Gatwood →Podcast: Added the fact that as of end of 2019, it was still going, and had reached 40th episode. However, the rest violates WP:OR, because it is publishing user exprience, rather than citing sources. (There is no mention of the podcast format or the depth of their relationship at the cited source.)
• 21:2321:23, 8 January 2020 diff hist +1,160 Olivia Gatwood Removed unreliable source tag. Began to standardise/normalise citn content, styles. Corrected various sentences to appended citns. DID dozen COPY EDITS, placed copy edit tag expert will review. Noted all infobox, much lead information still unsourced. Next, bust.com article does not state that debut work received positive reviews, it simply mentions book, its sales. Hence, this citn moved to Further reading, sentence labeled with {{cn}}—since "reviews" mentioned in plural, needs ≥3 sources Tag: references removed
• 20:5020:50, 8 January 2020 diff hist +15 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 20:4920:49, 8 January 2020 diff hist +1,479 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 20:3920:39, 8 January 2020 diff hist +1,905 Baloxavir marboxil Corrected issue with Shionogi numbers in drugbox. Added a resistance sentence to the lead, because this is what everyone doing research on this is talking about. Added further discovery chemistry information, including the fact that the onmarket drug is a prodrug (as well as the compounds abbreviations and synonyms that appear in its many publications).
• 19:5119:51, 8 January 2020 diff hist +20 EGLN1 I chose this tag over the one that would have described this as a review of primary literature, but either of these would be accurate. We are interpretting the primary research literature, which was not the intended role of WP, per its founders and founding generation. We are supposed to report the preponderance of scientific opinion from secondary sources, see sections of WP:VERIFY.
• 19:0019:00, 8 January 2020 diff hist +14 Baloxavir marboxil Adding bare URLs tag to invite ReFill team in to do a first-pass completion of these URL references.
• 18:5918:59, 8 January 2020 diff hist +412 Baloxavir marboxil →Resistance: Added further sentence and sources regarding resistance research.
• 18:5218:52, 8 January 2020 diff hist +28 Roche →Products: List is out of date, but updating, sans citations, is a thesis project. Don't add more without citations!
• 18:5018:50, 8 January 2020 diff hist +23 Roche →Products: this list, by its nature, is inaccurate. To allow editors and readers no recourse to verify content violates WP:VERIFY.
• 18:4718:47, 8 January 2020 diff hist +32 Baloxavir marboxil →Medical use
• 18:4518:45, 8 January 2020 diff hist +2,512 Baloxavir marboxil Added Chemistry section. Moved the Resistance section to the point in the article below the Side effects section (because of the preeminence of adverse events data in drug approval). Moved the clinical trial content from the Medical uses section to the Approvals section, for editing or replacement by the alternative material (see Talk). Even if the blockquote is added, this pre-existing material needs to be integrated.
• 18:0418:04, 8 January 2020 diff hist −2 Baloxavir marboxil →Resistance: Elevating the Resistance subsection to section status, because of the continuing importance of this matter.
• 18:0318:03, 8 January 2020 diff hist +251 Baloxavir marboxil →Approval: Since approvals listed include Japan, the opening sentence was edited to include the JMHLW. The use of these two trials for the Japanese approval needs to be confirmed, hence the tag.
• 17:5417:54, 8 January 2020 diff hist 0 Baloxavir marboxil →Approval: Moved definition of abbreviation to point of furst occurence in section.
• 17:5317:53, 8 January 2020 diff hist +211 Talk:Baloxavir marboxil →Plagiarism moved here, for re-use as blockquote or paraphrase
• 17:4817:48, 8 January 2020 diff hist +150 Baloxavir marboxil →Approval: Added the one easily paraphrased sentence that I could. Leaving the rest to the original editor.
• 17:4617:46, 8 January 2020 diff hist −228 Talk:Baloxavir marboxil →Plagiarism moved here, for re-use as blockquote or paraphrase: Moved and inegrated one easily paraphrased sentence into the article. What remains can easily be blockquoted.
• 17:4117:41, 8 January 2020 diff hist +1,643 Talk:Baloxavir marboxil →Plagiarism moved here, for re-use as blockquote or paraphrase
• 17:3517:35, 8 January 2020 diff hist +11 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 17:3417:34, 8 January 2020 diff hist +2 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 17:3317:33, 8 January 2020 diff hist +2 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 17:3317:33, 8 January 2020 diff hist 0 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 17:3217:32, 8 January 2020 diff hist +684 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 17:2617:26, 8 January 2020 diff hist +885 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 17:2117:21, 8 January 2020 diff hist +25 Talk:Audrey Assad →Self-published interview citations
• 17:1917:19, 8 January 2020 diff hist +1,156 Talk:Audrey Assad →Self-published interview citations
• 17:1017:10, 8 January 2020 diff hist +733 User talk:Walter Görlitz/Archived Talk to 2020-12 →Could you look in here: new section
• 17:0517:05, 8 January 2020 diff hist −14 Baloxavir marboxil Undid revision 934812540 by Whywhenwhohow (talk) THis is a misuse of the PD notice, to justify plagiarism. PD material cannot be cut and pasted in without editing. Even if such plagiarism is widespread elsewhere in Wikipedia, it is not, in the Wikiproject Medicine, and should not begin. Paraphrase or quote material if you want it in. Verbatim use is plagiarism—look at examples at WP:PLARIARISM. Engage at Doc James Talk page. Tag: Undo
• 17:0117:01, 8 January 2020 diff hist −1,774 Baloxavir marboxil Undid revision 934812453 by Whywhenwhohow (talk) PLEASE STOP EDDIT WARRING, AND ENGAGE IN THE DISCUSSION AT THE TALK PAGE OF DOC JAMES. DO NOT REVERT AGAIN UNTIL YOU GET FURTHER ADVICE. Yes, you are allowed to summarise public domain material; but you are not allowed to use it verbatim—i.e., you are not allowed to cut and paste sentences, unchanged, and present them as your own choice and ordering of words. Quote/praphrase it! Tag: Undo
• 16:5816:58, 8 January 2020 diff hist +96 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 16:5616:56, 8 January 2020 diff hist +15 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 16:5616:56, 8 January 2020 diff hist +511 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Plagiarism
• 16:5316:53, 8 January 2020 diff hist +360 User talk:Doc James →Issue of plagiarism
• 16:5216:52, 8 January 2020 diff hist −1,774 Baloxavir marboxil Undid revision 934811137 by Whywhenwhohow (talk) You misunderstand—public domain does not mean material can be plagiarised, and used without paraphrasing or quoting. PLEASE, enter into discussion at Doc James Talk page, and do not continue to edit war. Tag: Undo
• 16:5016:50, 8 January 2020 diff hist +3,403 Talk:Baloxavir marboxil →Plagiarism moved here, for re-use as blockquote or paraphrase: new section
• 16:4016:40, 8 January 2020 diff hist −1,774 Baloxavir marboxil Removing plagiarism. It would have been a good edit, but the material drawn was used verbatim, without quotation marks, and so is being moved to Talk. One sentence was integrated, and so with the paraphrase, allows retention of the source, as a placeholder for the other material to be returned, either as a blockquote, or a clear, strong paraphrase.
• 16:3016:30, 8 January 2020 diff hist +427 User talk:Doc James →Issue of plagiarism: new section
• 16:2816:28, 8 January 2020 diff hist +1,099 User talk:Whywhenwhohow →Measles