User contributions for 2A00:23C4:20D:1300:6126:AED1:A1CB:B1E
Appearance
Results for 2A00:23C4:20D:1300:6126:AED1:A1CB:B1E talk block log logs global block log filter log
23 September 2017
- 20:2520:25, 23 September 2017 diff hist +105 Talk:Anders Behring Breivik →he lost his appeal in 2017 re his human rights
- 20:2420:24, 23 September 2017 diff hist +161 Talk:Anders Behring Breivik →he lost his appeal in 2017 re his human rights
- 20:2020:20, 23 September 2017 diff hist +146 Talk:Anders Behring Breivik →he lost his appeal in 2017 re his human rights: new section
- 20:0720:07, 23 September 2017 diff hist −528 Anders Behring Breivik source does not say this at all, and where did he get this made-up money from?
- 19:0719:07, 23 September 2017 diff hist −16 Pol Pot No edit summary
- 19:0619:06, 23 September 2017 diff hist +89 Pol Pot No edit summary
- 19:0519:05, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,642 Criticism of Coca-Cola see talk please
- 19:0419:04, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,642 Criticism of Coca-Cola see talk please, you can libel a firm without proof. All I am asking for is that
- 19:0219:02, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,642 Criticism of Coca-Cola find citations before you post nonsense
- 17:3017:30, 23 September 2017 diff hist +219 Talk:Criticism of Coca-Cola →dont revert
- 17:3017:30, 23 September 2017 diff hist +219 User talk:2A00:23C4:20D:1300:6126:AED1:A1CB:B1E No edit summary
- 17:2717:27, 23 September 2017 diff hist +29 User talk:Sjö →Coke: new section
- 17:2717:27, 23 September 2017 diff hist +296 Talk:Criticism of Coca-Cola →dont revert: new section
- 17:2417:24, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,124 Criticism of Coca-Cola NO, you need to provide proper citations, then you can add, it doesnt work the way you say!?
- 17:2417:24, 23 September 2017 diff hist −518 Criticism of Coca-Cola the Judge said Coke werent involved at all, hardly criticism
- 17:2117:21, 23 September 2017 diff hist +290 User talk:Catlemur →coca cola: new section
- 17:1917:19, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,124 Criticism of Coca-Cola not proper sources, find ones that are allowed by Wiki if you can and then you can add this again
- 17:0817:08, 23 September 2017 diff hist −4,212 Criticism of Coca-Cola there literally isnt even 1 citation for all these claims, please do not re-insert unless you can prove what is written Tag: section blanking
- 17:0217:02, 23 September 2017 diff hist −668 Criticism of Coca-Cola no citation at all for this stupid claim Tag: section blanking
- 17:0117:01, 23 September 2017 diff hist −496 Criticism of Coca-Cola not relevant
- 17:0017:00, 23 September 2017 diff hist −748 Criticism of Coca-Cola needs citation