User contributions for 2A02:8084:F1BE:9180:D1D3:6B4E:9DF5:9775

This IP address is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

20:15, 14 September 2023 Ingenuity talk contribs changed block settings for 2a02:8084:f1be:9180::/64 talk with an expiration time of 1 year and 6 months (anon. only, account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Disruptive editing)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

21:1321:13, 12 August 2021 diff hist +2,322 User talk:Mattbuck →Wales & West: new section
15:5715:57, 12 August 2021 diff hist −8 Grand Central (train operating company) →Current fleet: also, use of the word "Class" in the Class column is, IMO, rather superfluous (except, of course, in the heading)
15:5415:54, 12 August 2021 diff hist −198 Grand Central (train operating company) →Current fleet: GC only operates *one* class of train at present, so why have the Trainset column at all in that case? Removing it also means that the table isn't longer than most people's monitors, and so they don't have to scroll to see when the Adelantes were built
15:4515:45, 12 August 2021 diff hist −36 Wales & West →Rolling stock: IMO, use of the word "Class" in the Class column is rather superfluous (except in the heading, of course). Also, for year ranges entirely within the century beginning in 1900 and ending in 1999, I think it's only necessary to state the last two digits of the ending year Tag: Reverted
15:3815:38, 12 August 2021 diff hist −33 Thameslink (train operating company, 1997–2006) →Rolling stock: use of the word "Class" in the Class column is, IMO, rather superfluous (except, of course, in the heading)
15:3415:34, 12 August 2021 diff hist +8 Valley Lines (train operating company) Tidied the lead. I wouldn't say Prism Rail's takeover by NatEx is 100% relevant here, but I've retained the corresponding references
15:2415:24, 12 August 2021 diff hist −22 Valley Lines (train operating company) →Rolling stock: use of the word "Class" in the Class column is, IMO, rather superfluous (except in the heading, of course)
15:1915:19, 12 August 2021 diff hist −1 First Great Eastern Removed superfluous comma from the lead
15:1515:15, 12 August 2021 diff hist −44 Thames Trains Is it not easier to state the actual number of stations that Thames Trains called at, rather than "similar number to that of First Great Western Link"?
14:2714:27, 12 August 2021 diff hist +2 Stansted Express →Operations: IMO, the route looks tidier with an en dash between the termini than it does with a hyphen
14:2514:25, 12 August 2021 diff hist −18 Stansted Express →Current fleet: tidied this table too
14:2414:24, 12 August 2021 diff hist +16 Stansted Express →Past fleet: the 379s are part of the Electrostar family, of course
14:2314:23, 12 August 2021 diff hist −60 Stansted Express →Past fleet: IMO, use of the word "Class" in the Class column is rather superfluous (except in the heading, of course)
14:1814:18, 12 August 2021 diff hist −15 Heathrow Connect →Rolling stock: IMO, use of the word "Class" in the Class column is rather superfluous (except, of course, in the heading)
14:1514:15, 12 August 2021 diff hist +9 Heathrow Express →Past fleet: again, use of the word "Class" in the Class column is, IMO, superfluous (except in the heading)
14:1314:13, 12 August 2021 diff hist −8 Heathrow Express →Current fleet: IMO, use of the word "Class" in the Class column is superfluous (except in the heading, of course)
14:0714:07, 12 August 2021 diff hist +46 Anglia Railways →Rolling stock: added family names in italics where applicable, purely for purposes of consistency
14:0314:03, 12 August 2021 diff hist −29 Wessex Trains →Rolling stock: each instance of the word "Class" in the Class column is superfluous (except the heading, of course)
14:0014:00, 12 August 2021 diff hist −176 Gatwick Express →Current fleet: why even have the "Family" column when GatEx operates only *one* class of train? The fleet tables for a number of defunct TOCs, including First North Western, Anglia Railways and Wessex Trains (all of whom operated more than one class of train, incidentally), do not have a "Family" column and instead, where applicable, put the family name in italics after the class number

12 August 2021