User contributions for 49.179.183.11

1 November 2021

• 11:5611:56, 1 November 2021 diff hist +7 Tourism in Australia No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
• 11:4211:42, 1 November 2021 diff hist +576 Tourism in Australia update to border rules for travellng Tag: Visual edit

31 October 2021

• 08:5708:57, 31 October 2021 diff hist +91 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact
• 08:5408:54, 31 October 2021 diff hist +1,750 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Was it a successful withdrawal?: new section
• 07:5607:56, 31 October 2021 diff hist +183 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:4507:45, 31 October 2021 diff hist +1,306 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:2407:24, 31 October 2021 diff hist +104 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:1707:17, 31 October 2021 diff hist −250 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:1607:16, 31 October 2021 diff hist −33 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:1207:12, 31 October 2021 diff hist +992 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:0207:02, 31 October 2021 diff hist +154 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 07:0007:00, 31 October 2021 diff hist +101 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 06:5806:58, 31 October 2021 diff hist +779 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 06:5306:53, 31 October 2021 diff hist +176 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact
• 06:3906:39, 31 October 2021 diff hist +865 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 06:1006:10, 31 October 2021 diff hist +115 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 06:0706:07, 31 October 2021 diff hist +270 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 06:0306:03, 31 October 2021 diff hist +963 UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Aftermath: As agreed, moved nuclear proposal by McCarthur to the aftermath after the withdrawal. He requested nukes to stop the enemy advances. Added sources. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:5705:57, 31 October 2021 diff hist −946 Hungnam evacuation →Aftermath: moving it Tag: Reverted
• 05:5005:50, 31 October 2021 diff hist +880 Talk:Hungnam evacuation →Zero mention in Aftermath on how they lost territory: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:2905:29, 31 October 2021 diff hist 0 Talk:Hungnam evacuation No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:2505:25, 31 October 2021 diff hist −9 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:2205:22, 31 October 2021 diff hist +123 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:1505:15, 31 October 2021 diff hist +855 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 02:1602:16, 31 October 2021 diff hist +692 Battle of Chosin Reservoir Added sources Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 02:1102:11, 31 October 2021 diff hist +534 Battle of Chosin Reservoir Added content of a huge historical aftermath detail. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 02:0102:01, 31 October 2021 diff hist +13 Hungnam evacuation No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 02:0002:00, 31 October 2021 diff hist +1,199 Hungnam evacuation A historically noteworthy aftermath of what happened on 24th December and shortly afterwards. McCarthur had requested nukes to prevent further Chinese advances and create a wall of radiation and nuke certain parts of china, Korea and Manchuria. He requested it immediately following or same day the evacuation was finally completed. And fortunately was declined. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 01:4401:44, 31 October 2021 diff hist −6 Hungnam evacuation Peacock word.. Seriously. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 01:0601:06, 31 October 2021 diff hist +979 Talk:Hungnam evacuation →Zero mention in Aftermath on how they lost territory: new section
• 00:5400:54, 31 October 2021 diff hist +2 Hungnam evacuation →Background: Added a few spacers as previous paragraph was just an oversized excessive paragraph. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 00:4800:48, 31 October 2021 diff hist 0 Hungnam evacuation This article is poorly edited
• 00:4500:45, 31 October 2021 diff hist +698 Talk:Hungnam evacuation →Quit exit warring yourself.: new section
• 00:3700:37, 31 October 2021 diff hist +863 Talk:UN Forces retreat from North Korea →Not that evident and it is a huge fact: new section
• 00:2400:24, 31 October 2021 diff hist +219 UN Forces retreat from North Korea Revert back as my info is undoubtedly true and I gave full reasons already om edit description. Don't edit war yourself and abuse the 3RR rules. Go to TALK and meet me there before reverting obviously true info that needed to be mentioned Tag: Undo
• 00:1900:19, 31 October 2021 diff hist +1,609 User talk:Mztourist →Quit Edit warring: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 00:0200:02, 31 October 2021 diff hist +780 Talk:Second Phase Offensive →Obviously the miles should be added in: new section

30 October 2021

• 23:5523:55, 30 October 2021 diff hist +353 Second Phase Offensive Quit vandalising. It is obvious that you're gaming the system now. My edits were appropriate, just and necessary yet you keep reverting to hide info you subjectively dislike without a single decent reason given. You should go to TALK and explain yourself. Not editors who are adding real info that you remove unethically. Your last warning and revert again without explaining yourself on Talk with a good reason and I will report you to vandalism as people should know they specific miles, etc Tags: Undo Reverted
• 08:4008:40, 30 October 2021 diff hist +2 UN Forces retreat from North Korea A retreat and a change of territory doesn't actually automatically mean the same thing. They are not even synonymous. A retreat doesn't necessarily mean the enemy troops will take over the abandoned territory. Maybe they are too weak or too slow to take over and gain that large amount of territory. Hence why it needs to be mentioned that the enemy troops did indeed quickly retake the territory. As it is a completely separate second outcome from the evacuation. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 08:1108:11, 30 October 2021 diff hist +198 Hungnam evacuation Source and grammar Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 08:0908:09, 30 October 2021 diff hist +285 Hungnam evacuation Added source and content on the amount of territory they had to abandon as part of the evacuation. Tag: Visual edit
• 08:0308:03, 30 October 2021 diff hist +49 Hungnam evacuation And as direct consequence of that evacuation, the outcome is that the Chinese and NK troops gained territory. It is completely relevant and true but you don't want to admit it. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 07:5707:57, 30 October 2021 diff hist +218 UN Forces retreat from North Korea What does completely evident even mean? That it is true information? The two major outcomes should be mentioned. One was a retreat and consequently the Chinese/North Koreans regained territory as part of that retrear Tags: Undo Reverted
• 07:5307:53, 30 October 2021 diff hist −26 Second Phase Offensive I read the entire article. There is zero mention of 200 miles. It's not already "evident". Tag: Reverted
• 07:5107:51, 30 October 2021 diff hist +379 Second Phase Offensive You have been warned. You are now removing information that is well sourced and essential. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 07:4907:49, 30 October 2021 diff hist +84 Battle of Chosin Reservoir People should know what campaign the battle was in. It is not evident and in the entire actual article, there is no mention of it. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 05:3505:35, 30 October 2021 diff hist +379 Second Phase Offensive Added citation plus details. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:5404:54, 30 October 2021 diff hist +1 Second Phase Offensive Misspelling Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:5204:52, 30 October 2021 diff hist +84 Battle of Chosin Reservoir Added in essential background info. The battle was a key part of the Chinese People's Volunteer Army (PVA) Second Phase Campaign. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:2904:29, 30 October 2021 diff hist +111 Bodo League massacre No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit