User contributions for 50.1.48.10

18 November 2013

• 04:0004:00, 18 November 2013 diff hist −1 Go (programming language) →Types: rm unmatched (, though it's a little goofy to note Pike/Thompson did UTF8 here anyhow (this is about Go's syntax, not its historical context...)
• 03:3303:33, 18 November 2013 diff hist +1,280 Go (programming language) →Syntax and package system: both enlarge and break up "Syntax" section, which was never really syntax anyway

17 November 2013

• 05:5205:52, 17 November 2013 diff hist −421 PageRank →Algorithm: sorry, assertion in this para doesn't appear borne out by the description below (outbound links don't hurt you) and parts of it aren't totally clear

14 November 2013

• 06:3706:37, 14 November 2013 diff hist 0 Go (programming language) →Projects and organizations using Go: sp
• 06:3706:37, 14 November 2013 diff hist +55 Go (programming language) →Projects and organizations using Go: the WHOLE laundry list
• 06:3506:35, 14 November 2013 diff hist +1,422 Go (programming language) →Projects and organizations using Go: add a libraries section; picked these based on outside signs of notability, like the 4years post and godoc's 'popular' list

31 October 2013

• 05:2605:26, 31 October 2013 diff hist +74 Talk:Go (programming language) →Improving Syntax section

16 October 2013

• 03:0503:05, 16 October 2013 diff hist +74 Go (programming language) →Syntax and package system

13 October 2013

• 07:5907:59, 13 October 2013 diff hist +2,824 Talk:Go (programming language) →A shelved section on Go's types: new section
• 07:5707:57, 13 October 2013 diff hist −279 Go (programming language) →Syntax and package system: change what's commented
• 07:0207:02, 13 October 2013 diff hist −48 Go (programming language) →Goroutines, channels, and select
• 06:4906:49, 13 October 2013 diff hist +57 Go (programming language) →Interface system: another way to say "Reader is just something with a Read", without involving Go's declaration syntax

12 October 2013

• 04:3504:35, 12 October 2013 diff hist −35 Go (programming language) →Echo: less here too
• 04:3304:33, 12 October 2013 diff hist −686 Go (programming language) →Hello world: i think it's out of place to explain that the brace placement is mandatory
• 04:2904:29, 12 October 2013 diff hist −30 Go (programming language) →Interface system: pedantic, but RepeatChar is a bad name when Go actually supports Unicode chars and it doesn't. also, maybe the para above should get folded into comments in the example
• 03:3203:32, 12 October 2013 diff hist +91 Go (programming language) grammar-o and try to make lead para more natural, add godoc.org as it's sort of CPANny
• 03:2303:23, 12 October 2013 diff hist −26 Go (programming language) coupla nits

11 October 2013

• 04:3304:33, 11 October 2013 diff hist −381 Go (programming language) fold gccgo sentence into lead section and kill Implementations section
• 04:1804:18, 11 October 2013 diff hist +19 Go (programming language) →Goroutines, channels, and select
• 04:1704:17, 11 October 2013 diff hist −7 Go (programming language) →Goroutines, channels, and select
• 04:1204:12, 11 October 2013 diff hist +2,505 Go (programming language) →Concurrency: ok, new concurrency section--sentences are long, things are a bit wonky, would really love more refs to examples of channel uses, but the bits are mostly there

10 October 2013

• 03:0203:02, 10 October 2013 diff hist +1,033 Go (programming language) →Concurrency: go more into exactly what's meant by lack of safe concurrency; wordy but can cut later

9 October 2013

• 06:2406:24, 9 October 2013 diff hist −33 Go (programming language) "compared to some popular languages" still puts too much focus on comparing, when the point is more that these are the particular features/non-features of Go
• 06:1506:15, 9 October 2013 diff hist +2 Go (programming language) →Syntax and package system: the section isn't just about changes from C syntax
• 06:1106:11, 9 October 2013 diff hist −277 Go (programming language) make Description the lead section. also, i think leading with an explicit comparison to Java/C# could wrongly make the whole article sound like a comparison, when it's not, so cut that
• 06:0706:07, 9 October 2013 diff hist +56 Go (programming language) move down discussions of stuff left out + origins of concurrency features in prep for making Description into the lead section
• 05:4305:43, 9 October 2013 diff hist 0 Go (programming language) →Interface system: move example down
• 05:4105:41, 9 October 2013 diff hist +458 Go (programming language) →Interface system: okay, make the interfaces example do something (run SHA-256 on a test input). i *think* it's a somewhat realistic example for coders. also shows demoes adding methods to a non-struct, something article hasn't otherwise touched

8 October 2013

• 07:2807:28, 8 October 2013 diff hist −49 Go (programming language) →Syntax, formatting, and packaging
• 07:2607:26, 8 October 2013 diff hist +33 Go (programming language) →Syntax, formatting, and packaging
• 07:2507:25, 8 October 2013 diff hist +3,029 Go (programming language) →Name visibility: make this a rump syntax section
• 06:3506:35, 8 October 2013 diff hist −16 Go (programming language) →Interface system: not memmodel
• 06:2106:21, 8 October 2013 diff hist +5 Go (programming language) →Interface system
• 06:0606:06, 8 October 2013 diff hist −139 Go (programming language) →Interface system: wew
• 05:4105:41, 8 October 2013 diff hist +73 Go (programming language) →Hello world: playground link

6 October 2013

• 23:5523:55, 6 October 2013 diff hist −1 Go (programming language) →Interface system: by "custom type" i just meant not built-in, but "named type" is the more official term for it
• 23:4623:46, 6 October 2013 diff hist −516 Go (programming language) →Implementations: doesn't make sense to treat Windows separately now that it's just another port, and "tiny," being unmaintained and out of the main tree, seems not notable anymore
• 20:3320:33, 6 October 2013 diff hist +1,086 Talk:Go (programming language) →Features, examples, other references: backin' up
• 18:3418:34, 6 October 2013 diff hist 0 Go (programming language) →Interface system: two So,s in a row
• 18:3318:33, 6 October 2013 diff hist +111 Go (programming language) →Interface system: more explicitly flag the paragraph as being about the implementation, though it also says a little bit about the semantics (that they're nillable and act like pointers)
• 18:2718:27, 6 October 2013 diff hist +71 Go (programming language) →Interface system: nillability belongs next to the other implementation details
• 06:5006:50, 6 October 2013 diff hist +5 Go (programming language) →Interface system: 'then' doesn't make sense
• 06:4906:49, 6 October 2013 diff hist +8 Go (programming language) →Interface system: interface{} is not quite the single-rooted object hierarchies, and be more precise about how it relates to void*; <code> again
• 06:3506:35, 6 October 2013 diff hist +33 Go (programming language) →Interface system: less awk bit abt type assertions/switches
• 06:3206:32, 6 October 2013 diff hist 0 Go (programming language) →Interface system: had said 'any reuqired methods' instead of 'the required methods' because of interface{}, but it's just confusing to worry about it and 'the' may still be technically correct (it's just 'the 0 required methods' for interface{})
• 06:2906:29, 6 October 2013 diff hist −6 Go (programming language) →Interface system
• 06:2806:28, 6 October 2013 diff hist +310 Go (programming language) →Interface system: <code> things up; just give up and put the Reader iface right in the text; cut more here and there
• 06:1506:15, 6 October 2013 diff hist −85 Go (programming language) →Interface system: encoding/binary is a confusing example w/out more detail; change leadin to Sizer example
• 06:0906:09, 6 October 2013 diff hist −55 Go (programming language) →Interface system: shorten the first para to avoid eyes glazing
• 06:0706:07, 6 October 2013 diff hist −8 Go (programming language) →Interface system