User contributions for 50.37.120.69

9 December 2016

• 19:5119:51, 9 December 2016 diff hist −442 Malcolm Ashworth →Ancestry and Family: Burke glorified every family he was writing about and extended their pedigree into legend, so his word on this is dubious; links to kings 600+ years before are ininformative Tag: references removed
• 19:4819:48, 9 December 2016 diff hist −933 Christina Oxenberg →Ancestry: remove uninformative trivia, material based on original research in non-RS Tag: references removed
• 19:4519:45, 9 December 2016 diff hist −1 Elizabeth FitzHugh typo
• 19:4519:45, 9 December 2016 diff hist −476 Elizabeth FitzHugh the closest royal tie is sufficient to establish her social connections
• 19:4219:42, 9 December 2016 diff hist −107 Chevalliers of Aspall Hall remove claim to distant royal ancestry that has little relevance
• 19:4019:40, 9 December 2016 diff hist −100 Elizabeth Wriothesley, Countess of Southampton distant royal ties less unimportant given more proximate connections
• 19:3819:38, 9 December 2016 diff hist −194 Gervais Rentoul remove information derived from primary source - WP:NOR Tag: references removed
• 19:3519:35, 9 December 2016 diff hist −112 Guiney remove unsupported claim to royal ancestry
• 19:2719:27, 9 December 2016 diff hist −56 Zander (surname) Alexander the Great did not have this as a surname
• 19:2319:23, 9 December 2016 diff hist −104 Fromm →Variants: this is not a variant of the surname
• 19:1519:15, 9 December 2016 diff hist −512 Allison (surname) →Origins: simplify, remove unreliable attempt to link them to French Counts, also in the patronymic explanation, it would not derive from a surname, but from a parent's given name
• 19:1019:10, 9 December 2016 diff hist −306 Bryan (surname) rephrase, remove unsupportable distinction between i vs y
• 19:0719:07, 9 December 2016 diff hist −259 Bryan (surname) remove false derivation from Norman dukes - that Brionne family died out
• 19:0519:05, 9 December 2016 diff hist −1,485 Bryan (given name) →Origin and meaning: remove unreliable speculation about surname playing any role in the given name, also suggestion that i vs y is meaningful, which is unsupportable Tag: references removed
• 18:5218:52, 9 December 2016 diff hist −521 Guillaume (surname) remove groundless speculation based on non-RS web page Tag: references removed
• 18:5118:51, 9 December 2016 diff hist −158 Wismer (surname) rephrase to put the German direct derivation before the speculative A-S alternative, which is not WP:V
• 18:3318:33, 9 December 2016 diff hist −262 Cambra clarify that this is all 18th century nonsense, remove categories that make her seem real
• 18:2718:27, 9 December 2016 diff hist +252 Terrell (surname) →Coat of arms: restore ref
• 18:2618:26, 9 December 2016 diff hist −891 Terrell (surname) →Ties to the British Royal Family: that one person with this surname married someone with famous relatives is not relevant to the family in general Tag: section blanking
• 18:2118:21, 9 December 2016 diff hist −52 Tyrrell (surname) Family can't be traced prior to the 11th century
• 01:2101:21, 9 December 2016 diff hist −410 Richard Scott (settler) →Ancestry of Richard Scott and Katharine Marbury: remove random collection of distant ancestors ofwife
• 01:2001:20, 9 December 2016 diff hist −3,125 Desloge family →Genealogy: remove section - these are ancestries of wives of two specific people with this surname, not ancestors of the family as a whole Tag: section blanking
• 01:1501:15, 9 December 2016 diff hist −491 Ann Hawkes Hay remove claims to distant ancestry based on non-reliable source
• 01:1401:14, 9 December 2016 diff hist −442 Cockayne baronets →Cockayne family: remove unsupported and trivial claims to ancient royal ancestry
• 01:1201:12, 9 December 2016 diff hist −724 John Gallup →Early history: remove meaningless claim to 'first landed gentry in America' and disputed status as 'gateway', whatever that means Tag: references removed
• 00:5000:50, 9 December 2016 diff hist 0 Coenwulf of Mercia as explained below, may have been sister