Jump to content

User contributions for 64.35.203.197

Results for 64.35.203.197 talk block log logs global block log filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

4 September 2024

29 August 2024

12 July 2024

26 February 2024

23 February 2024

16 February 2024

13 February 2024

  • 22:1022:10, 13 February 2024 diff hist +1 Kingdom of Strathclyde So it would appear that your objection is grammatical and not of a historicity nature. well, you are incorrect. tribes may be referenced as people. For instance, the various Puyuma tribes enjoy eating fried wild rat. The early germanic tribes tended not to dwell in villages but lived dispersed among family farmsteads. In both cases the tribes are being referenced as a people. I could continue and argue that humans also anthropomorphize countries/tribes. please YOU revert your edit back to mine. Tag: Reverted
  • 08:4908:49, 13 February 2024 diff hist +7 Kingdom of Strathclyde Yes you are right tribes are made up of people not bovines, that would be a herd. Stop messing with the page Dudley miles. You are not it’s curator, just an over inflated egotistical editor. Why don’t you reread all those semi-decent history books on your shelf. The Welsh were not one people. There were separate tribes of them. So the correction is correct. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 00:4100:41, 13 February 2024 diff hist +7 Kingdom of Strathclyde Inserting the word tribes accurately describes the welsh people at the time concerned. The lay reader benefits from this as it conjures the realistic image of a people not unified but sharing a common “homeland” Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 February 2024

2 February 2024

23 December 2023