User contributions for 67.167.8.141

27 December 2019

• 07:1407:14, 27 December 2019 diff hist +1 User talk:SmokeyJoe →You do yourself and the encyclopedia a great injustice...
• 07:1307:13, 27 December 2019 diff hist +146 User talk:SmokeyJoe →You do yourself and the encyclopedia a great injustice...
• 07:1207:12, 27 December 2019 diff hist +132 User talk:SmokeyJoe →You do yourself and the encyclopedia a great injustice...

23 December 2019

• 14:4914:49, 23 December 2019 diff hist 0 Francis Chan →Personal life: Copy edit. Markup typo corrected.
• 14:4814:48, 23 December 2019 diff hist +427 Francis Chan →Personal life: Completed one source. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
• 14:4314:43, 23 December 2019 diff hist +3 The Gospel Coalition →Projects: There is no "currently" in encyclopedic writing; material drawn is dated to source appearing. Moreover, claims about organisations soley from original webpages—without use of archived versions—fails to time-define the material drawn. Readers later returning to original site inevitably find changes from original visit. Differing content means source is no longer accurate to/supportive of article. Bottom lines: for time-defined statements use archived website; more 3rd-party refs.
• 14:3114:31, 23 December 2019 diff hist +74 The Gospel Coalition The overwhelming majority of this article's content are derived from the TGC's website or other materials, making this article a non-independent, first-party extension of that organization's own website and relate promotional materials. This article needs to move quickly and signifcantly in the direction of being third-party sourced, and until it makes great strides in that direction (e.g., >2/3 of sources not TGC, nor interviews with TGC members), it is not encyclopedic, and tags should remain.
• 14:2214:22, 23 December 2019 diff hist +167 The Gospel Coalition →Criticism: Statement regarding social justice criticism has been hidden, given weasel wording and lack of citation. It still exists in an in-text note, and can be returned when a published, third-party source is provided.
• 04:5204:52, 23 December 2019 diff hist −3 Francis Chan →Early life and education: Corrected error in citation markup, eliminating red letter error that appeared in the references.

21 December 2019

• 01:0201:02, 21 December 2019 diff hist +4 Maria Popova →Further reading: Copy edit, punctuation.
• 01:0201:02, 21 December 2019 diff hist +372 Maria Popova →Further reading: Added whoandwhom, temporarily to further reading.
• 00:5800:58, 21 December 2019 diff hist +762 Maria Popova Citation checking, 3. Bare URLs tag is temp, to invite in ReFill team to fill citn. List of places published checked against appearing refs. Edits: Plagiarism/close paraphrase changed to quote. HuffPost unsupported so out of lead. Nebo citn doesn't state who Popova has written for, and is a commercial source, providing interview as means to draw clients to their digital marketing business. (Moved to Further reading.) 3 FOR 3 MISUSED CITNS NOT MATCHING TEXT. MAKES WHOLE ARTICLE SOURCING SUSPECT.
• 00:0700:07, 21 December 2019 diff hist +160 Maria Popova Citation checking, 2. Atlantic pub list source moved to where it applies. It does not support the MIT statement.
• 00:0200:02, 21 December 2019 diff hist −289 Maria Popova whoandwhom citation clearly plagiarised. See Talk. All references to this being removed, and marked as {{cn}} followed by <!--whoandwhom PLAGIARISM--> so content chan be re-sourced and checked. Tag: references removed

20 December 2019

• 20:5020:50, 20 December 2019 diff hist +224 Maria Popova Checked and completed the Catie Lazarus interview citation.

19 December 2019

• 01:5501:55, 19 December 2019 diff hist +35 Biodiesel production Noting need for secondary sources. This is a review (and a poorly sourced on, because reviews are thoroughly sourced, and cite earlier reviews), not an encyclopedic article.
• 01:5201:52, 19 December 2019 diff hist +452 Biodiesel production →Feedstock pretreatment: Section needs a lot more work. Most of the material appearing is not sourced.
• 01:4401:44, 19 December 2019 diff hist +112 Biodiesel production →External links: The two advertising/product information commercial links were moved here.
• 01:4201:42, 19 December 2019 diff hist −102 Biodiesel production →Ultrasonic reactor method: Same issue, a commercial equipment manufacturer is not the right post hoc source for this section's content. Where did this information come from, originally? Find secondary sources, extract content from them, and then cite them. Tag: references removed
• 01:3901:39, 19 December 2019 diff hist +269 Biodiesel production →External links: See last edit summary.
• 01:3801:38, 19 December 2019 diff hist −210 Biodiesel production →Ultra- and high-shear in-line and batch reactors: Citing a commercial supplier of mixing equipment does not support this sections content in an encyclopedic way. The commercial website is moved to external links. Tag: references removed

18 December 2019

• 09:0209:02, 18 December 2019 diff hist −70 Elif Shafak Looked in on the appearances of the several appearances of the ECFR. Corrected style to abbreviation-following-full-name. Still have not found a good source for this "founding member" claim. Please help. (Third-party is needed, we have one autobio.)
• 08:5508:55, 18 December 2019 diff hist +1,029 User talk:Kindly Copyeditor →Could you possibly: new section
• 08:4808:48, 18 December 2019 diff hist +105 Elif Shafak →Fiction: Repaired 1 badly formatted NYT citn as start to make all good citns similarly formatted. NOTE, the 2 citns with very long quotes appear this way TEMPORARILY, so that relevant material can be seen by other editors, and used to place missing inline citns. NOTE as well, these 2 aren't particularly good citns—when an author publishes, they provide bio to publisher to use in promotional materials; likewise book promo sites. So these, several other citns, are autobios, not third-party!
• 08:3908:39, 18 December 2019 diff hist 0 Elif Shafak →Other recognition: Copy edit. Corrected puncituation.
• 08:3508:35, 18 December 2019 diff hist +5,891 Elif Shafak This article is very troubling for this academic. Every section I have checked, e.g., subsection "Academic career", shows misuse of sources, thus plagiarised material. ISSUE OF PLAGIARISM IS RAMPANT HERE. I have marked some but not all points of issue. If this were a student paper, I would bin it and make them begin again. Instead, careful line by line work will be necessary, for most of this material appears without attribution, and sources that do appear are placed very misleadingly.
• 06:3606:36, 18 December 2019 diff hist +24 Elif Shafak →Prize judging history: Another entire section of purported factual content without a single source.
• 06:3506:35, 18 December 2019 diff hist +197 Elif Shafak →TED talks: Calling attention to the wholesale plagiarsim that constitutes these sections. Well-meaning or no, this is contrary to WP:VERIFY and WP:OR. Please stop it.
• 06:2906:29, 18 December 2019 diff hist +28 Elif Shafak →TED talks: No statements without sources, all facts traceable and verifiable, please. It is WP's rule.
• 05:2805:28, 18 December 2019 diff hist +1,437 Battle of the Zab Added two entries to further reading, so students coming here can go to reliable, readable sources for content.
• 04:5904:59, 18 December 2019 diff hist +1,527 Battle of the Zab Completed the one citation appearing in the infobox using "cite encyclopedia" template, and the one Further reading entry, using "cite book". [Don't blame me for Kennedy. I simply formatted what was (and wasn't) there.] Just this one name in the infobox is sourced. The article on the whole deserves the unreferenced and OR tags.
• 03:5203:52, 18 December 2019 diff hist +139 Plagiarism from Wikipedia →Notable instances: REmoved Oxford because source link, a blog is dead, and the source is poor, this making us repeat an accusation. Find this in a major British newspaper, or in the Chronicle of Higher Education, or some such, with the soruce saying not that they were accused, but that they were found guilty, then put it back in.
• 03:4403:44, 18 December 2019 diff hist +75 Córdoba, Spain →Architecture: Have had enough of subsection after subsection with many paragrpahs without a since stated source. Whether the materials in in or out of copyright, this is plagiarism. You cannot take all this material, much of it purported to be factual, without stating sources. This is patently dishonest—see Charles Lipson's "Doing Honest Work in College", UChicago Press.—and this plagiarised appropriation is rampant here.
• 03:3903:39, 18 December 2019 diff hist 0 Córdoba, Spain →Sculptures and memorials: Copy edit. Markup correction.
• 03:3903:39, 18 December 2019 diff hist +25 Córdoba, Spain →Sculptures and memorials: Because not a bit of this is sourced.
• 03:3803:38, 18 December 2019 diff hist +86 Córdoba, Spain →Gardens, parks and natural environments: Calling for the citations required by W:VERIFY.
• 03:3503:35, 18 December 2019 diff hist +86 Córdoba, Spain →Festivals: Please source the content for the rest of the section, comparing the content to the found source, AND MAKING THE CONTENT ALIGN WITH THE SOURCE. If all this material is from the one cited soure, please reproduce that citation, at least at the end of every paragraph. But, critically, DO NOT JUST PASTE IN A SOURCE THAT IS CLOSE. That is putting lipstick on a pig. If a source stating what is here cannot be found, the text must be made to reflect the soure that is found and used.
• 03:3203:32, 18 December 2019 diff hist +25 Córdoba, Spain →People: Noting this all to be original research, or plagiarised content.
• 03:3103:31, 18 December 2019 diff hist +93 Córdoba, Spain Copy edit, added mmissing pipe. Edited all references to the Oxford Classical Dictionary to the same format (first pass).
• 03:1103:11, 18 December 2019 diff hist +656 Córdoba, Spain →History: Various non-encyclopedic features of the history of the Roman period are being remedied. But I am afraid an expert is needed to move this from sophomoric to encyclopedic.

16 December 2019

• 05:4505:45, 16 December 2019 diff hist +247 Maria Popova →Curator's Code: Object strenuously to the repeated weasel word amplification of the controversy based on this single reference. There are no "mixed responses" and no "few critics", and the "most criticism" is a statement we must take on faith—because all that appears is ONE citation of the opinion of one blogger.
• 05:2605:26, 16 December 2019 diff hist −102 Maria Popova Copy edit. Mispelling in lead. Updating a link in the External links, and making all descriptions accurate and roughly the same length. Note, brainpickings.org is out, because already cited in the infobox.
• 05:2005:20, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:MB →Barbara Lazaroff
• 05:1805:18, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:Dl2000 →Francesco Lotoro
• 05:1805:18, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:Atlantic306 →Please comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin
• 05:1605:16, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:GoingBatty →Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
• 05:1505:15, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:SWP13 →WiR stub contest second place
• 05:1405:14, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:Jmertel23 →HAVP article
• 05:1405:14, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:Frietjes →Thank you, but...
• 05:1305:13, 16 December 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:Racklever →"change ref"