User contributions for 67.193.18.194

18 July 2014

• 22:2022:20, 18 July 2014 diff hist +388 User talk:67.193.18.194 →July 2014
• 17:2917:29, 18 July 2014 diff hist +469 Shawinigan Handshake The link is good enough for this Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Dallaire Deletionists are the bain of casual editors like me.
• 17:1017:10, 18 July 2014 diff hist +469 Shawinigan Handshake It's worth noting because an attempted assassination is going to affect your state of mind when a protester breaks your RCMP security detail. It's obvious a piece relevant to this situation.
• 17:0617:06, 18 July 2014 diff hist +9 Donald Trump It's one word that adds context and information that improves the value of this story. Leaving it out reduces the information available to the reader. Deletionists like you push away casual editors like me.
• 16:4116:41, 18 July 2014 diff hist +236 Shawinigan Handshake Voila!
• 16:3116:31, 18 July 2014 diff hist +9 Donald Trump How about you take to the talk page before deleting and I stop donating to Wikipedia, though I've only done it once.
• 16:3016:30, 18 July 2014 diff hist +233 Shawinigan Handshake Here's the reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aline_Chr%C3%A9tien I do not know how to add it as a footnote in the article. Helping rather than undoing would seem to be benificial.
• 02:3102:31, 18 July 2014 diff hist +9 Donald Trump Of course it's relevant. If a bank wants my tax returns to establish income I can't give them unfiled tax returns. Filing them with the government adds a degree of legitimacy due to consequences for lying.
• 02:2802:28, 18 July 2014 diff hist +233 Shawinigan Handshake Just add the friggin footnote. I don't know how. Never donating $ again to wikipedia.
• 01:2201:22, 18 July 2014 diff hist +9 Donald Trump Okay, here it is without the "but". See rational in origin edit below.

17 July 2014

• 21:0621:06, 17 July 2014 diff hist +12 Donald Trump If you file this document with the government, you can suffer serious consequences for lying. But I can fill one out that says I'm worth $7 trillion. I'm not questioning the accuracy, but that it was unfiled is relevant.
• 20:4420:44, 17 July 2014 diff hist +233 Shawinigan Handshake Here's the source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aline_Chr%C3%A9tien Instead of deleting relevant, factual information how about helping out!

14 July 2014

• 13:5613:56, 14 July 2014 diff hist +233 Shawinigan Handshake Undid revision 616870857 by 117Avenue (talk) Someone attacks you in your home you're going to act differently. This is highly relevant.

8 July 2014

• 23:1923:19, 8 July 2014 diff hist +233 Shawinigan Handshake →The incident

25 June 2014

• 20:1620:16, 25 June 2014 diff hist +277 Talk:Transnistria →Status
• 04:4804:48, 25 June 2014 diff hist 0 Alain Vigneault →NHL coaching record: 12 doesn't seem right, and this Wikipedia link states 70: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000%E2%80%9301_NHL_season

21 June 2014

• 02:1602:16, 21 June 2014 diff hist +5 Ontario Central Ontario would be Muskoka, Parry Sound, maybe Barrie and Peterborough. Very few French there. Lots of French, however, in Northeastern Ontario.

9 June 2014

• 15:0415:04, 9 June 2014 diff hist +2 Glengarry County, Ontario →External links
• 15:0015:00, 9 June 2014 diff hist −116 Glengarry County, Ontario Glengarry County is not an administrative County and therefore has no administrative centre.
• 14:5614:56, 9 June 2014 diff hist +1 Talk:Eastern Ontario →Defining Region's Boundaries
• 14:5514:55, 9 June 2014 diff hist +627 Talk:Eastern Ontario Incorrect Boundaries
• 14:4614:46, 9 June 2014 diff hist +913 Talk:Sudbury District →The City of Greater Sudbury is part of the Sudbury District
• 14:3414:34, 9 June 2014 diff hist −57 Northeastern Ontario Eliminated text is redundant - Greater Sudbury is in the Sudbury District. Greater Sudburry is properly included and identified in the Cities and towns sections.
• 14:2714:27, 9 June 2014 diff hist −4 Shaw Communications I know they have cable service in Sault Ste. Marie, and that's Northeastern Ontario.

6 June 2014

• 22:2922:29, 6 June 2014 diff hist +122 Talk:Abortion in Canada →This article is not balanced or fair.

4 June 2014

• 01:3101:31, 4 June 2014 diff hist +266 Talk:Maleficent (film) Who's perspective really?

26 May 2014

• 03:2803:28, 26 May 2014 diff hist −770 Talk:Rand Paul No edit summary

25 May 2014

• 17:3817:38, 25 May 2014 diff hist +475 Talk:Rand Paul →Changed political positions
• 17:3617:36, 25 May 2014 diff hist +771 Talk:Rand Paul →Changed political positions

15 May 2014

• 02:3102:31, 15 May 2014 diff hist −4 Beau risque It reads better without yet?
• 02:3002:30, 15 May 2014 diff hist −104 Beau risque The deleted comment is highly disputed and certainly not NPOV.

17 April 2014

• 03:4403:44, 17 April 2014 diff hist −36 Fatima Houda-Pepin Ya, except she didn't support the Charter!
• 03:4203:42, 17 April 2014 diff hist +20 Fatima Houda-Pepin Wow, talk about putting words in her mouth that she never made!