User contributions for 81.101.137.204

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

00:4100:41, 8 September 2007 diff hist +6 Office Open XML I don't agree. The comments about IBM unreasonably trying to stop OOXML is certainly inaccurate, and the article's neutrality is certainly disputed. Should stay.

22:3522:35, 29 July 2007 diff hist +401 OpenDocument HAI please stop vandalising my posts. Microsoft provides OOXML patent covenant not ECMA. Microsoft's covenant re OOXML is validly criticised for not covering future versions or things refered to
22:2622:26, 29 July 2007 diff hist +1,334 OpenDocument HAI please stop my vandalising posts. Brian Jones's opinions are not the only valid opinions. In this case the arguments he put's forward have counterpoints which must be presented.
11:3911:39, 29 July 2007 diff hist +248 OpenDocument →Criticism: Citation is required and this is added.
11:3011:30, 29 July 2007 diff hist +3 OpenDocument →Criticism: grammar
11:2811:28, 29 July 2007 diff hist +1,114 OpenDocument Original argument is contrived and illogical. By definition application specific name tags are application specific. ODF seeking to be vendor neutral not Microsoft specific like OOXML is virtue.
10:5210:52, 29 July 2007 diff hist +525 OpenDocument →Criticism: Changed to match the what is actually stated in the patent statement, and explanation separated. Shortcomings put into context WRT other standards as it is no worse. Tex, Java is open.