User contributions for 81.105.56.240

9 February 2009

• 23:5723:57, 9 February 2009 diff hist −967 User talk:81.105.56.240 thanks // already aware of 3rr
• 23:2123:21, 9 February 2009 diff hist −3,179 Pedophile movement perhaps if you didn't re-indert references to non-existent magazines, blogs, "groups" and advocacy, the finer points could then be discussed in detail.
• 23:1523:15, 9 February 2009 diff hist −11 Pedophile movement Age of consent reform, not abolition
• 23:0723:07, 9 February 2009 diff hist −3,179 Pedophile movement the justification is clear - the topics are not activism related. there are also minor edits in your revert
• 22:4922:49, 9 February 2009 diff hist +292 User talk:Haiduc →Paidika?: new section
• 22:4022:40, 9 February 2009 diff hist +30 Child sex tourism Again, this can not be stated as fact. A better balance of sources is needed towards this end.
• 22:3722:37, 9 February 2009 diff hist −170 Child sex tourism rv to npov
• 22:3322:33, 9 February 2009 diff hist 0 Pedophile movement →History: m.edit, also, is the medical section above really appropriate or pertinent? Will leave that to consensus.
• 22:3022:30, 9 February 2009 diff hist +491 Talk:Pedophile movement →Dichotomizing
• 22:2522:25, 9 February 2009 diff hist −3,184 Pedophile movement rv to tyciol. no satisfactory reason given for reverting changes thusfar (boychat was not used as a source)

8 February 2009

• 07:1207:12, 8 February 2009 diff hist +702 Talk:Pedophile movement →Dichotomizing: new section
• 07:0307:03, 8 February 2009 diff hist −56 Pedophile movement →Present activism: -weasel
• 07:0007:00, 8 February 2009 diff hist −3,148 Pedophile movement you are free to disagree, but first raise a disagreement

3 February 2009

• 23:0223:02, 3 February 2009 diff hist −1 Pedophile movement minor link change
• 23:0023:00, 3 February 2009 diff hist +794 Pedophile movement →Present activism: Integrate old refs in more appropriate way, add a couple of examples of what little is currently on offer.
• 22:4822:48, 3 February 2009 diff hist +20 Pedophile movement →Present activism: Correct Ipce title, source, OK anomaly, more sources, IBLD is a fringe ref - no "groups" really involved, remove factual statement based on one man's word and no actual evidenc
• 22:4022:40, 3 February 2009 diff hist −63 Pedophile movement →Present activism: del now unrequired headers, one that asserted a needless and barely-notable conflation of two topics
• 22:3722:37, 3 February 2009 diff hist −3,994 Pedophile movement →Present activism: Links to "activism" are spurious, possibly accusatory, possibly advocacy. But definitely spurious.
• 22:3622:36, 3 February 2009 diff hist +65 Pedophile movement facsimile for convenience link can be to an advocacy site
• 22:3022:30, 3 February 2009 diff hist +31 Pedophile movement Undid revision 267186546 by SqueakBox (talk) no justification for this charge

29 January 2009

• 04:5304:53, 29 January 2009 diff hist +31 Pedophile movement "Interview with Martin de Jong, chairman of the Dutch Paedophile Association" does not demonstrate that NVSH=advocate of pedophilia. Some members have voiced concerns over this linkage, some have not