User contributions for 98.67.166.234

This IP address is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

22:58, 21 January 2023 Blablubbs talk contribs blocked 98.67.128.0/17 talk with an expiration time of 2 years and 11 months (account creation blocked) ({{Colocationwebhost}} )

This user or IP address is currently globally blocked. If the block is marked as locally disabled, this means that it applies on other sites, but a local administrator has decided to disable it on this wiki. The global block log entry is provided below for reference:

00:52, 21 January 2023: AntiCompositeNumber meta.wikimedia.org globally blocked 98.67.128.0/17 (talk) with an expiration time of 00:52, 21 December 2025 (account creation disabled) (Open proxy/Webhost: Visit the FAQ if you are affected )

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

23:0423:04, 12 November 2009 diff hist +617 Talk:Sybil Brand Institute No edit summary
22:5622:56, 12 November 2009 diff hist +342 Sybil Brand Institute No edit summary
22:3522:35, 12 November 2009 diff hist +69 Linda Kasabian No edit summary
22:2522:25, 12 November 2009 diff hist +341 Linda Kasabian No edit summary Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
22:0622:06, 12 November 2009 diff hist +214 Linda Kasabian What we had he was a "she" that could refer either to Squeaky Fromme or Kasabian. I wish that people would always make their antecedents clear!
21:4221:42, 12 November 2009 diff hist +787 Linda Kasabian The use of the word "countless" when they weren't actually countless, is very, very poor. "Numerous" is an accurate statement.
18:1318:13, 12 November 2009 diff hist −53 Sybil Brand Institute It is not customary or necessary to give the exact birth or death dates of people who are not the subject of the article. Just the years are quite enough.
18:1018:10, 12 November 2009 diff hist +27 Sybil Brand Institute This was very poor style of composition to begin a paragraph or a section of an article with "it" (likewise with he or she). This leaves a pronoun floating with a questionable antecedent.
18:0118:01, 12 November 2009 diff hist +553 Talk:Sybil Brand Institute No edit summary
07:5407:54, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1 Lorentz transformation No edit summary
07:5107:51, 12 November 2009 diff hist +349 Lorentz transformation No edit summary
07:3907:39, 12 November 2009 diff hist +59 Lorentz No edit summary
07:3207:32, 12 November 2009 diff hist +10 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →For every action...A Question?
07:3107:31, 12 November 2009 diff hist +676 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →For every action...A Question?
07:2607:26, 12 November 2009 diff hist +529 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →For every action...
07:1407:14, 12 November 2009 diff hist +690 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Constant mass? Special case?
07:0607:06, 12 November 2009 diff hist +6 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Constant mass? Special case?
06:5906:59, 12 November 2009 diff hist +2,516 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Constant mass? Special case?
06:2606:26, 12 November 2009 diff hist +102 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Constant mass? Special case?
06:0706:07, 12 November 2009 diff hist +9 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Constant mass? Special case?
06:0106:01, 12 November 2009 diff hist +15 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Some other thoughts about this page
05:5505:55, 12 November 2009 diff hist +4 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Dispute over statement of the Second Law
05:5305:53, 12 November 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Dispute over statement of the Second Law
05:5305:53, 12 November 2009 diff hist −2 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Dispute over statement of the Second Law
05:5105:51, 12 November 2009 diff hist +3,279 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Dispute over statement of the Second Law
05:0205:02, 12 November 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Dispute over statement of the Second Law
05:0105:01, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1,764 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Dispute over statement of the second law
04:2404:24, 12 November 2009 diff hist +704 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Second law in intro
03:5903:59, 12 November 2009 diff hist +631 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Inertial frames
03:4903:49, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1,910 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Equivalence. What equivalence ?
03:1403:14, 12 November 2009 diff hist +2 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Second Law and Impulse
03:1303:13, 12 November 2009 diff hist −6 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the "Classical mechanics" diagram's sub-legend ?
03:1203:12, 12 November 2009 diff hist +695 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the "Classical mechanics" diagram's sub-legend ?
03:0403:04, 12 November 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
03:0303:03, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
03:0203:02, 12 November 2009 diff hist +6 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
03:0003:00, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1,188 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
02:4602:46, 12 November 2009 diff hist +419 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
02:4002:40, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1,571 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
02:1402:14, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
02:1302:13, 12 November 2009 diff hist +716 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Change the 'Classical mechanics' diagram's sub-legend ?
01:4201:42, 12 November 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Recent reversions
01:4101:41, 12 November 2009 diff hist +5 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Recent reversions
01:3701:37, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1,710 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Descriptive name for Second Law
01:0501:05, 12 November 2009 diff hist +20 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Descriptive name for Second Law
01:0201:02, 12 November 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Descriptive name for second law
00:5900:59, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →A Bit confused
00:5900:59, 12 November 2009 diff hist +284 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Abit confused
00:5400:54, 12 November 2009 diff hist +4 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →Newton's 3rd law for bodies in motion
00:4800:48, 12 November 2009 diff hist −2,291 Talk:Newton's laws of motion →a question ?

12 November 2009