User contributions for Aknochel
Appearance
Results for Aknochel talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 127 edits. Account created on 12 July 2009.
30 May 2014
- 22:0222:02, 30 May 2014 diff hist +82 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 22:0222:02, 30 May 2014 diff hist +117 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 21:5921:59, 30 May 2014 diff hist −44 Cosmic inflation I've removed the reference to "faster than light" expansion in the introductory sentence, which is misleading or wrong
25 May 2014
- 12:0112:01, 25 May 2014 diff hist −2 Grand Unified Theory →Unification of forces and the role of supersymmetry
- 10:3910:39, 25 May 2014 diff hist +32 Grand Unified Theory No edit summary
- 10:3610:36, 25 May 2014 diff hist +29 Grand Unified Theory split intro sentence in two
13 May 2014
- 10:2810:28, 13 May 2014 diff hist +70 Grand Unified Theory Changed the sentence about there being GUT epoch in the early universe to reflect that this is a speculative hypothesis.
- 10:2310:23, 13 May 2014 diff hist +233 Talk:Grand unification epoch →Gravity
- 10:1410:14, 13 May 2014 diff hist +8 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 09:5909:59, 13 May 2014 diff hist +82 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 09:5809:58, 13 May 2014 diff hist +20 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 09:4809:48, 13 May 2014 diff hist +77 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 09:4609:46, 13 May 2014 diff hist −7 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?
- 09:4609:46, 13 May 2014 diff hist +835 Talk:Cosmic inflation →FTL expansion?: new section
23 May 2012
- 14:0814:08, 23 May 2012 diff hist −69 Physical cosmology remark about "photon structure knowledge" removed from intro
8 February 2011
- 11:1811:18, 8 February 2011 diff hist +831 Talk:Quark No edit summary
24 January 2011
- 21:3321:33, 24 January 2011 diff hist +132 Seesaw mechanism corrected small factual error
23 January 2011
- 20:0520:05, 23 January 2011 diff hist +37 Higgs boson Undid revision 409579266 by Mozart998 (talk): No, not until end of 2011
21 January 2011
- 11:3611:36, 21 January 2011 diff hist +70 m Higgs boson No edit summary
- 11:3011:30, 21 January 2011 diff hist +462 Higgs boson "prediction" is a little too strong for the reasons given in the footnote.
12 January 2011
- 18:3118:31, 12 January 2011 diff hist +136 Ectoplasm No edit summary
11 January 2011
- 13:3913:39, 11 January 2011 diff hist −282 Theory of everything Remove twitter reference - not notable
20 December 2010
- 16:0516:05, 20 December 2010 diff hist +526 Grand Unified Theory Mention some things about the current status of gut models in the introduction for the casual reader.
- 15:5215:52, 20 December 2010 diff hist +87 Theory of everything →The nuclear interactions: The wording was very black/white and was neglecting to at least mention developments in the field.
- 08:4008:40, 20 December 2010 diff hist +126 Large Hadron Collider Undid revision 403242041 by 69.57.53.74 (talk) - can you cite a reason for the removal?
18 December 2010
- 12:5912:59, 18 December 2010 diff hist +33 Higgs boson Undid revision 403009422 by 90.199.128.177 (talk) undid vandalism ~~~~
17 December 2010
- 13:3313:33, 17 December 2010 diff hist −135 Theory of everything Undid revision 402856617 by 95.91.143.115 (talk) Quality of edit (grammar, spelling) not sufficient, wording inappropriate
15 December 2010
- 23:1723:17, 15 December 2010 diff hist −587 Dark matter Undid revision 402525876 by Ancient Anomaly. Sorry, Progress in Physics in which all of this stuff was "published" is not a properly peer-reviewed journal.
14 December 2010
9 December 2010
- 11:1011:10, 9 December 2010 diff hist −57 m Standard Model No edit summary
- 11:0411:04, 9 December 2010 diff hist +543 Standard Model →Challenges to the standard model: The wording was partially very inaccurate, and some statements wrong. I hope it is more consistent now.
8 December 2010
6 December 2010
- 17:5917:59, 6 December 2010 diff hist −3 m Talk:Higgs boson →Let's create an "Introduction to the Higgs Boson" article
- 17:5617:56, 6 December 2010 diff hist +812 Talk:Higgs boson No edit summary
- 09:1609:16, 6 December 2010 diff hist −57 Theory of relativity Reverting vandalism 400820040 by 219.77.144.65 (talk)
29 November 2010
- 17:3617:36, 29 November 2010 diff hist +582 Talk:General relativity →It is time to bury general relativity
26 November 2010
- 09:4209:42, 26 November 2010 diff hist −365 Higgs boson The statement in this form is nonsensical. Odds to discover it in what time frame? ever? before the LHC? In any case, the article is almost 2 years old and those projections are not valid any more
- 09:3709:37, 26 November 2010 diff hist +1 m Higgs boson No edit summary
- 09:3509:35, 26 November 2010 diff hist +507 Higgs boson The graviton is not part of the standard model. The Higgs boson does not "mediate" mass. The argument about the higgs unitarity bound is somewhat model independent (not exclusively based on the SM)
25 November 2010
- 13:5913:59, 25 November 2010 diff hist +8 Supersymmetry Undid revision 398677706 by 117.205.3.52 (talk) - revert nonsensical edit
18 November 2010
- 11:2011:20, 18 November 2010 diff hist +200 Talk:Large Hadron Collider No edit summary
16 November 2010
- 21:0421:04, 16 November 2010 diff hist 0 Large Hadron Collider reverting the usual vandalism
3 November 2010
- 20:0620:06, 3 November 2010 diff hist +131 Large Hadron Collider →Operational timeline: The run with lead ions was of course not "recently" proposed.
- 13:0013:00, 3 November 2010 diff hist −29 Particle physics Undid revision 394351913 by 59.162.104.194 (talk) - suspected vandalism
1 October 2010
- 13:4413:44, 1 October 2010 diff hist +90 Talk:Grand Unified Theory →grand unified theroy could be stated in terms of vacuum energy
16 September 2010
- 12:5412:54, 16 September 2010 diff hist +23 Dark energy Undid revision 385155926 by 195.195.166.57 (talk) - It does interact with gravity, that's the point...
2 September 2010
- 07:3907:39, 2 September 2010 diff hist −243 Theory of everything Undid revision 382365018 by WHF Christie (talk) - Sorry, the linked site's content is not based on peer reviewed scientific material.
4 August 2010
- 07:3707:37, 4 August 2010 diff hist +454 Talk:Quantum electrodynamics →Quantum Field Theory for the Electroweak Force ???