User contributions for BigGameFish

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

09:0209:02, 20 December 2013 diff hist +54 The Upper Footage Undid revision 586924239 by C U Next Time (talk) Again an inaccurate description. 13 out of 16 positive is not mixed. with over 80% critic response you include 3 negative?
08:5808:58, 20 December 2013 diff hist +54 The Upper Footage Undid revision 586923907 by C U Next Time (talk) Its clear whats going on here but I have to go to bed so if someone wants to write a fair post cite http://releasetheupperfootage.com.
08:5508:55, 20 December 2013 diff hist +54 The Upper Footage Undid revision 586923569 by Tokyogirl79 (talk) I was not referring to user reviews, I was referring to critic reviews. As for Horrormovies.ca, he is a staff writer, you can ask the site.
08:5208:52, 20 December 2013 diff hist −175 The Upper Footage →Synopsis
08:4308:43, 20 December 2013 diff hist −892 The Upper Footage →Reception: How can you say reception on the marketing was mixed? Show me the negative. Everywhere that I can find, even the places that do not like the film, have praised the marketing.
08:4108:41, 20 December 2013 diff hist +946 The Upper Footage →Reception: Says mixed reception yet 8 out of 10 IMDB reviews are very positive. 13 out of 16 overall reviews are positive. 2 out of 3 RT reviews positive. Why include only 1 positive review and pick something negative that wasn't even said?
08:2608:26, 20 December 2013 diff hist +946 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:Tokyogirl79 (Result: )
07:5507:55, 20 December 2013 diff hist −160 The Upper Footage Undid revision 586918358 by Ishdarian (talk) How is this copyright? It is completely different? Ah if you guys want to say untruths about a film you never saw I guess I can't do anything about it
07:4807:48, 20 December 2013 diff hist +449 User talk:Ishdarian No edit summary
07:4607:46, 20 December 2013 diff hist +451 User talk:Ishdarian No edit summary
07:3607:36, 20 December 2013 diff hist −160 The Upper Footage Undid revision 586916560 by Tokyogirl79 (talk) Tokoyogirl79 is constantly making edits to slander the film and has filled this page with untrue information. Obvious shill here, What a shame.
07:3207:32, 20 December 2013 diff hist +1,523 User talk:BigGameFish No edit summary
07:2807:28, 20 December 2013 diff hist +1,370 User talk:ReaderofthePack →Upper Footage page: new section
07:1207:12, 20 December 2013 diff hist −160 The Upper Footage →Synopsis: Again this is does not represent the film's events. Obvious this is someone who has not seen the project and is trying to discredit it.
07:0507:05, 20 December 2013 diff hist +781 User talk:BigGameFish →Conflict of interest
06:5406:54, 20 December 2013 diff hist +5 The Upper Footage →Synopsis: This synopsis is not accurate to the film as this person obviously did not view the picture. Took the actual film synopsis to accurately describe the events.

19:1819:18, 19 December 2013 diff hist +5 The Upper Footage →Synopsis
19:1219:12, 19 December 2013 diff hist +67 The Upper Footage →Synopsis
19:1019:10, 19 December 2013 diff hist −1,261 The Upper Footage →Reception
19:0319:03, 19 December 2013 diff hist +67 The Upper Footage →Synopsis
18:5418:54, 19 December 2013 diff hist +132 The Upper Footage No edit summary
18:5118:51, 19 December 2013 diff hist +67 The Upper Footage →Synopsis

20 December 2013

19 December 2013