User contributions for Cerotidinon
Appearance
Results for Cerotidinon talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 55 edits. Account created on 14 February 2014.
4 June 2024
- 09:3409:34, 4 June 2024 diff hist −2 m Smart system No edit summary current
- 09:3409:34, 4 June 2024 diff hist +1 m Smart system No edit summary
11 November 2023
- 15:3715:37, 11 November 2023 diff hist −3 Party of Humanists New logo
7 February 2023
- 12:2412:24, 7 February 2023 diff hist +82 m Quadratic assignment problem →Computational complexity: Slightly expanded explanation of TSP
19 March 2022
- 21:2721:27, 19 March 2022 diff hist −1 m Party of Humanists →Federal state parties
- 21:2621:26, 19 March 2022 diff hist −2 m Party of Humanists →Federal state parties: Commata removed
- 21:2621:26, 19 March 2022 diff hist −3 Party of Humanists →Federal state parties: Chairman Bavaria
- 13:2613:26, 19 March 2022 diff hist +1,041 Party of Humanists Update March 2022
20 December 2021
- 08:4908:49, 20 December 2021 diff hist +286 Minsc →References in other media: Added depiction in MTG
7 January 2021
- 09:3609:36, 7 January 2021 diff hist +15 Party of Humanists →Federal state parties: Updated Leaders
- 09:0309:03, 7 January 2021 diff hist −254 Party of Humanists →Leadership: Updated Leadership
3 November 2020
- 14:0414:04, 3 November 2020 diff hist −40 Murphy's law →History: Removed unsubstantiated and unprovable claim.
10 October 2019
- 14:5014:50, 10 October 2019 diff hist +11 Computable function Undid revision 920406069 by Jochen Burghardt (talk) Singular without an article is wrong there, changed to plural. Tag: Undo
9 October 2019
- 15:4515:45, 9 October 2019 diff hist +3 m Computable function No edit summary
8 September 2019
- 15:4815:48, 8 September 2019 diff hist −584 Volt Europa Removed "membership". This term is ambiguous and there are no official sources to support the claim. Membership could either mean "members of the movement" or "members in all political parties" or "members of an association". It seems to be the first case, but in this case the field membership does not seem to convey useful information, since it is not clear how to count the members of a movement.
- 15:4415:44, 8 September 2019 diff hist +26 Volt Europa →History: Italian article is talking about "voluntaries", which is not the same as members.
- 15:1115:11, 8 September 2019 diff hist −10 Volt Europa →History: Same as before, source does not support claim
- 15:0915:09, 8 September 2019 diff hist −174 Volt Europa Twitter post is not a reliable source, the other sources say 25.000 (but even they are not official and therefore only limited in their validity)
7 September 2019
- 05:4605:46, 7 September 2019 diff hist −31 Algebraic number →Examples: Is already said in the introduction, does not add value to the sentence, since it is not a special property of pi and e (but for all non-algebraic numbers).
- 05:4105:41, 7 September 2019 diff hist −53 Algebraic number Improved formulation; reduced redundancy, clarified role of pi and e
3 September 2019
- 16:4916:49, 3 September 2019 diff hist +25 Computable number Church called them the effectively calculated, some papers therefore refer to effective numbers (e.g. vanDerHoeven - Computations with effective real numbers)
2 September 2019
1 September 2019
- 00:2000:20, 1 September 2019 diff hist −28 Algorithm engineering Dead link replaced
31 August 2019
- 22:4522:45, 31 August 2019 diff hist −261 Wikipedia:Third opinion →Active disagreements: Resolved (for now), one left
- 22:3922:39, 31 August 2019 diff hist +375 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Undid revision 912947049 by Glrx (talk) Added reference, see also: Discussion and https://www.mpfr.org/pub.html Tag: Undo
- 22:2322:23, 31 August 2019 diff hist +35 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Undid revision 912947521 by Glrx (talk) See discussion Tag: Undo
- 03:4203:42, 31 August 2019 diff hist +110 List of arbitrary-precision arithmetic software →Libraries: Added another library
- 03:1303:13, 31 August 2019 diff hist +289 List of arbitrary-precision arithmetic software →Libraries: Added geometric libraries with arbitrary-precision number types
- 01:1901:19, 31 August 2019 diff hist 0 m Barrett reduction Fixed year in reference
- 00:0700:07, 31 August 2019 diff hist +186 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
30 August 2019
- 23:5223:52, 30 August 2019 diff hist +26 List of arbitrary-precision arithmetic software →Libraries
- 19:5019:50, 30 August 2019 diff hist +336 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
- 19:3319:33, 30 August 2019 diff hist +1,103 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
- 17:3317:33, 30 August 2019 diff hist +890 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
- 05:3805:38, 30 August 2019 diff hist +2,285 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
29 August 2019
- 21:1021:10, 29 August 2019 diff hist −230 Wikipedia:Third opinion →Active disagreements: Answered Talk:Kaliningrad#Language_of_the_article, two remain
- 21:0421:04, 29 August 2019 diff hist +9 m Talk:Kaliningrad →Language of the article
- 21:0221:02, 29 August 2019 diff hist +457 Talk:Kaliningrad →Language of the article
- 20:4820:48, 29 August 2019 diff hist +311 User talk:Glrx →Arbitrary-precision arithmetic: new section
- 00:0600:06, 29 August 2019 diff hist +96 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
- 00:0600:06, 29 August 2019 diff hist +323 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
28 August 2019
- 23:2523:25, 28 August 2019 diff hist +575 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
- 23:2123:21, 28 August 2019 diff hist +1,350 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic
- 22:4122:41, 28 August 2019 diff hist +291 Wikipedia:Third opinion →Active disagreements
- 22:3922:39, 28 August 2019 diff hist +626 Talk:Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Third opinion on Big-O-Notation / Usage of Arbitrary-precision arithmetic: new section
- 22:1922:19, 28 August 2019 diff hist +35 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic →Implementation issues: Corrected Notation for lower bounds
18 August 2019
- 03:4403:44, 18 August 2019 diff hist +85 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Undid revision 911276350 by Glrx (talk) Yes, floating-point bignums. Such as MPFR and more, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_arbitrary-precision_arithmetic_software. Tag: Undo
- 03:3603:36, 18 August 2019 diff hist +18 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Undid revision 911277001 by Glrx (talk) Please take a course on Big-O-Notation. As is, the algorithm could have running time O(1), leading to only one single step. Big-O is useful EXCLUSIVELY for upper bounds. Tag: Undo
17 August 2019
- 18:0518:05, 17 August 2019 diff hist +85 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Undid revision 901856805 by Glrx (talk) That's still a valid application. In fact, most of the time floating-point bignums are used for non-rational numbers. They are furthermore a core component in exact-decisions number types, where all algebraic numbers can be represented. Changed the sentence before to "optimal or near-optimal". Tag: Undo
- 17:5117:51, 17 August 2019 diff hist +18 Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Undid revision 896968271 by Glrx (talk) O(n^2) is wrong there. If a faster algorithm would be used, it would not take 10^12 steps. This is only true for Theta(n^2) Tag: Undo