Jump to content

User contributions for Copymox

A user with 47 edits. Account created on 6 October 2017.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

2 January 2024

  • 03:2303:23, 2 January 2024 diff hist +1,306 Rhacodactylus leachianus Mating Behavior and Reproduction: The previous tone of this paragraph was assertive/factual, but nearly all of these details, while likely, remain speculative, as attested in the sources cited. That is, the tone of the paragraph did not match the tentative nature of the assertions in the source publications. The sources are not at fault, but the interpretation overstepped the veracity of the sources. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 01:5701:57, 2 January 2024 diff hist +44 Rhacodactylus leachianus Mating Behavior and Reproduction: A statement claimed 'Parthenogenesis has been observed ...', but this implies a much greater confidence in the theory than the evidence has shown. The evidence is presently only anecdotal, from lay hobbyists, who, while sincere, have not applied the scientific method to establish proof. Also, provenance (chain of ownership, as well as security of enclosures) in a hobby scenario is wildly susceptible to errors based on the absence of evidence falsely equat... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 January 2024

12 June 2023

22 January 2023

28 July 2022

22 August 2018

17 August 2018

  • 16:2516:25, 17 August 2018 diff hist +1 m Concorde Comma added, to remove ambiguity "limited to ocean-crossing only to prevent" change to "limited to ocean-crossing only, to prevent". Inserting the comma emphasizes that there were many possible flight paths, but all were prohibited except "ocean-crossing". Without the comma, the reader may infer that the reason for the restriction is trivial ("...only to prevent"), which it is not. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

11 May 2018

3 May 2018

11 April 2018

4 April 2018

  • 15:0015:00, 4 April 2018 diff hist −5 m 25I-NBOMe Serbia: An immediate and further change was made here, to clarify a statement which obviously stated the opposite if what was intended. The original text read '...wasn't s added...', and so the extraneous 's' was deleted. However, upon reading the cited PDF, it is clear that this name was, in fact, added to the cited list. So, 'was added' is the appropriate phrase. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
  • 14:5414:54, 4 April 2018 diff hist −2 m 25I-NBOMe Serbia: An extraneous lone letter 's' was deleted, although it is unclear whether the remaining text is what was intended. Therefore, this section requires further confirmation, irrespective of this change. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

26 March 2018

22 March 2018

20 March 2018

7 October 2017

6 October 2017