User contributions for DabYeetDab

This account is currently partially blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

19:43, 14 February 2021 Black Kite talk contribs blocked DabYeetDab talk contribs from the page Gina Carano with an expiration time of indefinite (Disruptive editing)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

22:3122:31, 1 December 2022 diff hist +78 m List of largest banks in the United States Reverted 2 edits by 103.70.201.209 (talk) to last revision by 163.116.146.119 Tags: Twinkle Undo

16:2116:21, 19 June 2022 diff hist +14 Paul Gosar →Attendance of white nationalist gathering

01:2201:22, 28 May 2022 diff hist +2 m Political positions of Tulsi Gabbard No edit summary
01:2101:21, 28 May 2022 diff hist +3 Political positions of Tulsi Gabbard It's 2022... abortion is NOT a "women's issue" because men can get pregnant too. This language is divise, hateful, exclusionary, and transphobic. Educate yourselves please.

20:5320:53, 19 May 2022 diff hist −7 Black people No edit summary

12:4512:45, 17 May 2022 diff hist +7 White people Again, this remains consistent with other articles Tags: Undo Reverted
11:5811:58, 17 May 2022 diff hist +7 White people The article Black people starts this exact same way so no reason not to do the same for White people Tag: Reverted

00:5200:52, 2 May 2022 diff hist +13 Angelina Jolie No edit summary

05:4805:48, 8 March 2022 diff hist +47 Spy film No edit summary

01:1201:12, 8 December 2021 diff hist +10 Scarlett Johansson No edit summary Tag: Reverted

08:0108:01, 4 August 2021 diff hist −749 Gal Gadot →Personal life: literally nothing to do with her personal life or her as a person Tag: Reverted

16:1416:14, 17 July 2021 diff hist −12 Jack Dylan Grazer No edit summary
13:1513:15, 17 July 2021 diff hist −32 Jack Dylan Grazer If you go to his official Instagram page, you can see he never changed them and he doesn't have them listed at all

18:1918:19, 14 February 2021 diff hist −21 Gina Carano Restored revision 1006767412 by DabYeetDab (talk) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
18:1118:11, 14 February 2021 diff hist −13 Gina Carano No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted
18:0918:09, 14 February 2021 diff hist −8 Gina Carano →Social media and political views Tags: Manual revert Reverted
17:1717:17, 14 February 2021 diff hist −8 Gina Carano it wasn't only "conservatives" who used the hashtag. This seems like unnecessary politicization to me Tag: Reverted
17:0217:02, 14 February 2021 diff hist −13 Gina Carano No edit summary Tag: Reverted
16:4616:46, 14 February 2021 diff hist −13 Gina Carano No edit summary Tag: Reverted
16:4316:43, 14 February 2021 diff hist −13 Gina Carano No edit summary

15:3115:31, 9 February 2021 diff hist −758 Gina Carano She has a right to an opinion and you cannot just put her opniion on here under "criticism" without actually PUTTING a notable reaction from a public figure or likewise, especially as she has never putrigh stated any of this, and it is all people interpreting and extrapolating this. Tag: Reverted
15:2815:28, 9 February 2021 diff hist −1,323 Gina Carano 1) Blocking troll Twitter accounts isn't newsworthy, and neither is simply opening an account on a social media platform. Again, she did NOTHING worthy of criticism" on it, she literally just reposted all her Tweets,Instagram posts. The people re-adding this are clearly biased and trying to push a negative agenda. There is objectively nothing wrong with it, and that sentence literally provided NO additional context or "cticicsm" it only stated she did something that is objectively not wrong. Tag: Reverted

19:5719:57, 6 February 2021 diff hist −4,161 Gina Carano This section shouldn't even be here considering 1)It was originally writtem with a heavy bias and 2) It offers nothing in terms of actual "criticism" it just lists things that random people on Twitter didn't like. Tags: Undo Reverted
16:2416:24, 6 February 2021 diff hist −4,161 Gina Carano This seciton has NOTHING to do with "criticism," know why? It is litwerally only a list of things that the person who originially write this section did not like. There aren't any "reliale sources" all the spurces do is just confirm what she did, they don't actually GIVE a reaction or anything of the sorts. Gina is allowed to have political opinions and personal beliefs, and if people don't like that, they don't get to slap a label on her and say everything she did was "controversial" and wrong. Tag: Reverted

17:4217:42, 3 February 2021 diff hist +1,477 Talk:Gina Carano No edit summary
17:3517:35, 3 February 2021 diff hist +854 User talk:DabYeetDab →Please, stop edit warring at Gina Carano

19:3619:36, 2 February 2021 diff hist +667 User talk:DabYeetDab →Please, stop edit warring at Gina Carano
18:4118:41, 2 February 2021 diff hist −1,288 Gina Carano nothing to discuss. We already all know the original author of this section wrote this heavily biased already. This stuff is all clearly biased and has nothing to do with Gina as a person. If you think owning a Parler account is something "controversial" YOU are putting your own negative bias on it, which violates the neutrality policy, so stop. Tags: Undo Reverted
03:1603:16, 2 February 2021 diff hist −1,288 Gina Carano Once again: simply putting a political stance of hers under a "criticism" section without ANY context is blatantly biased and her Parler account is COMPLELTEY irrelevant here and is also biased as it implies simply owning a parler account is something "controversial" She can also block WHOEVER she likes on Twitter as it is HER account, and also, there is no such thing as a "back lives matter account" Tag: Reverted

22:4422:44, 31 January 2021 diff hist −47 Gina Carano →Criticism: pushing for the reopening of churches is simply something she believes in, not something "criticism" worthy. Putting that under a section titled "criticism" implies that her views are wrong, especially as there was no additional context to that particular part.
22:3422:34, 31 January 2021 diff hist −840 Gina Carano →Criticism: her Parler account also isn't relevent here. All of her Parler posts were exactly the same as her Twitter posts. Her Twitter posts however, got spammed by bots and spam accounts, so her Parler account was just an alternative to Twitter with far less spam.
22:2222:22, 31 January 2021 diff hist −455 Gina Carano →Criticism: I thin kwe can remove this considering there's no such thing as a "black lives matter" account on twitter. Her blocking people on twitter isn't really anything notable, and some people baselessly taking that as "racism" is hardly anything worth putting here
15:3715:37, 31 January 2021 diff hist −4,143 Gina Carano This whole seciton is completley biased and poorly written. There is no such thing as a "black lives matter" account. Blocking people on Twitter is hardly notable enough to be considered "racism" especially just because a few Twitter users said she was. It also presents an extremely biased and negative viewpoint which breaks the neutrality policy. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

19:0419:04, 13 December 2020 diff hist −3,801 Gina Carano A few days worth of Twitter criticism doesn't warrant an entire seciton on her article. This was written highly subjectivley and biased and sources were also not objective either. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

04:3604:36, 26 November 2020 diff hist −3,810 Gina Carano As a whole, this section isn't really warranted because the "controversy" was not that big and didn't have any significant impact. Tags: Undo Reverted
03:4403:44, 26 November 2020 diff hist −2,996 Gina Carano again, this is clearly biased, and it also is not enough to warrant an entire section dedicated to it over a few social media posts that didn't receive that much attention. It has had hardly any impact on her, her career, or public image, so it isn't that important and doesn't need to be here. Tag: Undo
02:1702:17, 26 November 2020 diff hist −2,997 Gina Carano A few-days long Twitter hashtag doesn't warrant a "controversy" section, especially a heavily biased one
02:1502:15, 26 November 2020 diff hist +9 Leonardo DiCaprio →Personal life

11:5011:50, 19 November 2020 diff hist +9 Bradley Cooper →Early roles (2001–2008)

01:3201:32, 9 November 2020 diff hist −2 Jacobo Árbenz No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched
01:3101:31, 9 November 2020 diff hist +11 Jacobo Árbenz No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

19:1419:14, 29 October 2020 diff hist +11 Greg Jackson (MMA trainer) No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
19:1419:14, 29 October 2020 diff hist 0 Gina Carano No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
04:4704:47, 29 October 2020 diff hist 0 Melissa McCarthy No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

1 December 2022

19 June 2022

28 May 2022

19 May 2022

17 May 2022

2 May 2022

8 March 2022

8 December 2021

4 August 2021

17 July 2021

14 February 2021

9 February 2021

6 February 2021

3 February 2021

2 February 2021

31 January 2021

13 December 2020

26 November 2020

19 November 2020

11 November 2020

10 November 2020

9 November 2020

29 October 2020