User contributions for December Rush

5 January 2015

• 18:4418:44, 5 January 2015 diff hist +227 Talk:Flip-Chip module →Renaming the article
• 18:4318:43, 5 January 2015 diff hist +57 N Talk:Flip Chip (trademark) December Rush moved page Talk:Flip Chip (trademark) to Talk:Flip Chip (PDP module): this is a rather bad title because the article mostly not about the trademark, but is about the module themselves.
• 18:4318:43, 5 January 2015 diff hist 0 m Talk:Flip-Chip module December Rush moved page Talk:Flip Chip (trademark) to Talk:Flip Chip (PDP module): this is a rather bad title because the article mostly not about the trademark, but is about the module themselves.
• 18:4318:43, 5 January 2015 diff hist +52 N Flip Chip (trademark) December Rush moved page Flip Chip (trademark) to Flip Chip (PDP module): this is a rather bad title because the article mostly not about the trademark, but is about the module themselves.
• 18:4318:43, 5 January 2015 diff hist 0 m Flip-Chip module December Rush moved page Flip Chip (trademark) to Flip Chip (PDP module): this is a rather bad title because the article mostly not about the trademark, but is about the module themselves.

28 December 2014

• 17:3317:33, 28 December 2014 diff hist −1 Talk:Nullor →This is a pretty poor quality article
• 17:3317:33, 28 December 2014 diff hist +68 Talk:Nullor →This is a pretty poor quality article
• 17:1017:10, 28 December 2014 diff hist +2 Talk:Nullor →This is pretty poor quality article
• 17:0917:09, 28 December 2014 diff hist +528 Talk:Nullor →This is pretty poor quality article: new section
• 16:5216:52, 28 December 2014 diff hist +4 Current-feedback operational amplifier Comlinear was fairly notable; I think Exar bought them
• 16:3016:30, 28 December 2014 diff hist +1 Talk:Operational amplifier →Major lacunae in the article (and on Wikipedia)
• 16:2916:29, 28 December 2014 diff hist +257 Talk:Operational amplifier →Major lacunae in the article (and on Wikipedia)

27 December 2014

• 12:4712:47, 27 December 2014 diff hist +516 Talk:Operational amplifier →Major lacunae in the article (and on Wikipedia): new section

26 December 2014

• 10:4910:49, 26 December 2014 diff hist +58 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 26 Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMoy (2nd nomination). (TW)
• 10:4910:49, 26 December 2014 diff hist +1,197 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMoy (2nd nomination) Creating deletion discussion page for CMoy. (TW)
• 10:4910:49, 26 December 2014 diff hist +1,099 User talk:Generic shell Notification: listing at articles for deletion of CMoy. (TW)
• 10:4910:49, 26 December 2014 diff hist +251 CMoy Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMoy (2nd nomination). (TW)

23 December 2014

• 21:4721:47, 23 December 2014 diff hist −170 Memristor →2012: arXiv-only paper is not a milestone by any measure
• 21:4221:42, 23 December 2014 diff hist +29 Memristor No edit summary
• 21:4021:40, 23 December 2014 diff hist +53 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism: of course this article is full of improperly referenced criticism, but heaven forbit it contain any actually useful info, like the various models the boffins have been churning out.
• 21:3321:33, 23 December 2014 diff hist −1 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism
• 21:3221:32, 23 December 2014 diff hist −3 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism
• 21:3121:31, 23 December 2014 diff hist −2 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism
• 21:3021:30, 23 December 2014 diff hist +175 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism: well, self-endorse awesome mode, but at least this paper was published outside arXiv
• 21:2521:25, 23 December 2014 diff hist +240 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism: another cherry-picked and out-of-context quote, which applied only to Strukov's model, whereas the paper discusses more than one model and endorses the more elaborate ones!
• 21:0621:06, 23 December 2014 diff hist +442 N User talk:Lost C'Mell ←Created page with 'You keep adding to the memristor article that it cannot exist in physical reality according to some paper that was published only on Arxiv and whose conclusi...'
• 21:0121:01, 23 December 2014 diff hist −224 Memristor unsupported by the (reliable) ref left
• 21:0021:00, 23 December 2014 diff hist −28 Memristor cleaned up unpublished (ArxiV-only paper)
• 20:5920:59, 23 December 2014 diff hist −552 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism: repetition of the info from the previous paragraph and unsourced conclusions/material.
• 20:5520:55, 23 December 2014 diff hist −228 Memristor →Memristor definition and criticism: unreliable source (Arxix-only paper)( which should probably not be linked directly, but only via the refined version in Di Ventra (per the wiki rules on reliable sources)
• 20:5320:53, 23 December 2014 diff hist −282 Memristor misleading and poorly explained bit; since the blog post that shed some light on these *unpublished* (ArxiV-only) claims was deleted, so should this Meuffels ArxiV-only claims be. I've left *only* the claim actually endorsed by Di Ventra.
• 20:3220:32, 23 December 2014 diff hist +45 Template talk:Cleanup-spam No edit summary

17 December 2014

• 20:5720:57, 17 December 2014 diff hist −61 Chua's circuit This (huacircuits.com) is an external link; I never found those wiki portals of any use so I'm just deleting that because it looks odd by itself in a "see also" section...
• 19:5719:57, 17 December 2014 diff hist +252 Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations →Stability and stiffness: this is a rather strange claim but I think I know what it wants to say. Too bad we don't have an article on impact oscillator, despite the fairly large number of academic articles and books discussing that
• 19:4519:45, 17 December 2014 diff hist +320 Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations →Stability and stiffness: somewhat better ref here as it's not focused just on electronics
• 19:3719:37, 17 December 2014 diff hist +458 Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations →Stability and stiffness
• 19:2419:24, 17 December 2014 diff hist +160 Stiff equation →See also
• 19:2019:20, 17 December 2014 diff hist +129 Siconos →See also
• 19:1919:19, 17 December 2014 diff hist +143 Differential inclusion →Applications
• 19:1119:11, 17 December 2014 diff hist +23 Siconos →Performance
• 19:1019:10, 17 December 2014 diff hist +21 Siconos →Performance
• 19:0219:02, 17 December 2014 diff hist +45 Siconos →Performance: quantify (approx.)
• 18:5518:55, 17 December 2014 diff hist −42 Siconos →Performance
• 18:5018:50, 17 December 2014 diff hist +1,012 Siconos something about performance; they keep publishing the same buck converter results... so both paper are about the same thing as far as this issue is concerned
• 18:3818:38, 17 December 2014 diff hist +1 Siconos Similar to how we spell "non-smooth" in the other articles
• 18:3618:36, 17 December 2014 diff hist +75 Differential inclusion →Applications
• 18:3518:35, 17 December 2014 diff hist +7 Siconos No edit summary
• 18:3418:34, 17 December 2014 diff hist +2 Siconos →See also
• 18:3418:34, 17 December 2014 diff hist −1 Siconos →See also
• 18:3418:34, 17 December 2014 diff hist +126 Siconos →See also