User contributions for Dilaudid~enwiki
A user with 354 edits. Account created on 29 June 2005.
18 January 2014
- 09:5209:52, 18 January 2014 diff hist +468 User talk:DragonflySixtyseven →Deletion of Mikaeel Kular: new section
11 November 2013
- 13:5013:50, 11 November 2013 diff hist +286 Gini coefficient →World income Gini index since 1800s: Adding source paper for Milanovic's figures.
- 13:4613:46, 11 November 2013 diff hist +848 Talk:Gini coefficient No edit summary
- 13:2013:20, 11 November 2013 diff hist −342 Gini coefficient Undid revision 561047510 by Tim bates (talk) - removing figures from the canada conference board. Population weighted calculations assuming no income inequality within countries are just wrong.
3 October 2012
- 09:1009:10, 3 October 2012 diff hist +818 User talk:Gill110951 →In recognition of the huge improvement in the Two Envelopes Problem: new section
- 08:4308:43, 3 October 2012 diff hist +234 Talk:Two envelopes problem →Great work: new section
20 September 2012
23 June 2012
- 12:4612:46, 23 June 2012 diff hist +197 N User talk:Tqleo Efficacy edit looks like vandalism current
- 12:4512:45, 23 June 2012 diff hist +3 Efficacy rvv Undid revision 498965488 by Tqleo (talk)
21 June 2012
- 11:4111:41, 21 June 2012 diff hist +660 Talk:Sentience →Animal Rights Edits: delete the dull debate on bentham's argument
18 June 2012
- 19:1919:19, 18 June 2012 diff hist −17 Climate change →Feedback: High flammability of methane is a red herring - issue is its efficacy as a greenhouse gas
19 May 2012
- 13:5313:53, 19 May 2012 diff hist +499 Talk:New riddle of induction →Apologies - another question about the paradox: word-mince
30 April 2012
- 09:0409:04, 30 April 2012 diff hist +675 Talk:New riddle of induction →Apologies - another question about the paradox: new section
5 March 2012
- 08:2208:22, 5 March 2012 diff hist −94 Numeracy →Numeracy in childhood: Removing sig from article
10 February 2012
- 15:0215:02, 10 February 2012 diff hist 0 Principia Mathematica →An introduction to the notation of "Section B Theory of Apparent Variables" (formulas ✸8–✸14.34): correcting expression - I believe it previously said "If all Greeks are men and if all men are mortals then all Greeks are men"
15 November 2011
- 11:1511:15, 15 November 2011 diff hist +574 Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/13 November 2011/Usage share of operating systems →Discussion: Not an uncommon measure - used in media
10 November 2011
- 09:3909:39, 10 November 2011 diff hist +639 Talk:Usage share of operating systems →Support: I support the inclusion of the median
2 November 2011
- 08:5808:58, 2 November 2011 diff hist +166 Talk:2000-watt society →Units: 2 kWh per hour?
1 November 2011
- 14:5314:53, 1 November 2011 diff hist −65 Noam Chomsky By reading the sources, it appears they all refer to the 1992 survey.
28 October 2011
- 13:3513:35, 28 October 2011 diff hist −1,765 Gilbert Ryle →Criticisms: Deleting ad-hominem attack by Bloom, as per discussion on talk page
- 13:3413:34, 28 October 2011 diff hist +264 Talk:Gilbert Ryle →Criticisms: I will delete the stuff from Bloom - not notable or authoritative
25 October 2011
- 09:2409:24, 25 October 2011 diff hist +614 Talk:2 + 2 = 5 →Ellis clarification: clarification lacks clarity
10 August 2011
- 11:4211:42, 10 August 2011 diff hist +132 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?: split sections and amend comment
- 11:3611:36, 10 August 2011 diff hist +504 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
9 August 2011
- 19:3819:38, 9 August 2011 diff hist +941 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →The theorem
- 19:1719:17, 9 August 2011 diff hist +877 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
- 13:3413:34, 9 August 2011 diff hist +2 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →The theorem
- 13:2613:26, 9 August 2011 diff hist +227 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →The theorem
- 09:0209:02, 9 August 2011 diff hist +2 m Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
- 09:0109:01, 9 August 2011 diff hist +857 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?: 6 faces paradox
- 08:1408:14, 9 August 2011 diff hist −277 m Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?: gah delete silly error
- 07:5307:53, 9 August 2011 diff hist +4 m Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?: fixing formula
- 07:5307:53, 9 August 2011 diff hist +4 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
- 07:5207:52, 9 August 2011 diff hist +843 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
8 August 2011
- 21:5321:53, 8 August 2011 diff hist +436 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?: ok, let's see what Richard thinks
- 21:3721:37, 8 August 2011 diff hist +27 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
- 20:1220:12, 8 August 2011 diff hist +6 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?
- 20:1020:10, 8 August 2011 diff hist +2,696 Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments →My simple resolution - has this been covered in the literature?: new section
30 July 2011
28 July 2011
- 19:0519:05, 28 July 2011 diff hist +138 User talk:Tomixdf →Two Envelopes Paradox: removed more negative stuff I wrote
27 July 2011
- 19:4619:46, 27 July 2011 diff hist +140 Talk:Two envelopes problem →Martin's responses
- 16:3716:37, 27 July 2011 diff hist +806 Talk:Two envelopes problem →Martin's responses: tighter definition of A
- 09:4009:40, 27 July 2011 diff hist +97 Talk:Two envelopes problem →This is not a paradox
- 09:4009:40, 27 July 2011 diff hist +84 m Talk:Two envelopes problem →Can we all agree on the following?: why it is wrong to compare infinities.
- 09:2209:22, 27 July 2011 diff hist +32 Talk:Two envelopes problem →Can we all agree on the following?
- 09:1609:16, 27 July 2011 diff hist +2,067 Talk:Two envelopes problem →Can we all agree on the following?: new section
- 07:3507:35, 27 July 2011 diff hist +182 User talk:Gill110951 →Conclusions: Dropbox
- 07:2807:28, 27 July 2011 diff hist +151 User talk:Martin Hogbin →Two envelopes problem
- 07:2507:25, 27 July 2011 diff hist +595 Talk:Two envelopes problem →Puzzled
- 07:2007:20, 27 July 2011 diff hist +694 Talk:Two envelopes problem →This is not a paradox: I respectfully disagree
