Jump to content

User contributions for Edit709

A user with 18 edits. Account created on 31 January 2023.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

9 December 2024

2 December 2024

8 September 2024

7 September 2024

23 August 2024

2 August 2024

11 May 2024

2 May 2024

5 January 2024

4 January 2024

14 August 2023

  • 06:4606:46, 14 August 2023 diff hist +21 Heart of Stone (2023 film) The "Heart" is not a MacGuffin by any definition including that on Wikipedia ("necessary to the plot and the motivation of the characters, but insignificant, unimportant, or irrelevant in itself"). The Heart a powerful tool used by the various parties in ways that affect both the story and the world within the story.

6 August 2023

  • 06:4006:40, 6 August 2023 diff hist −17 Rollerball (1975 film) Removed "and conveniently" from "miraculously and conveniently survives". Seems to be editorial comment. "Conveniently" has 2 meanings in storytelling: the literal (does not apply here: Jonathan's survival is *inconvenient* to the Execs & the result of hard fought battle by him) or the ironic (suspicious, eg. "a little too convenient the witness died of a heart attack"). His survival is not suspicious within the film's narrative, leaving only the suggestion it's dubious he'd survive the match.

1 August 2023

25 May 2023

  • 18:3018:30, 25 May 2023 diff hist −117 Stewart Rhodes The linked article does not seem to use the phrase "armed rebellion" at all - much less as a quote Rhodes. It's also not made clear the claim is to prepare for an armed rebellion, or prepare to respond to one (i.e. the Oath Keeper Insurrection Act theory). The portion referring to "storm[ing] Congress" does not claim Rhodes plan included storming Congress, but rather says on that his plan was "inspired by a Serbian academic’s call for Americans to fill the streets and storm Congress."
  • 18:2518:25, 25 May 2023 diff hist +117 Stewart Rhodes Undid revision 1157003835 by Edit709 (talk) Tag: Undo
  • 18:2418:24, 25 May 2023 diff hist −117 Stewart Rhodes No edit summary Tag: Reverted

12 March 2023

31 January 2023

  • 02:2502:25, 31 January 2023 diff hist −38 Alison Roman Removed claim that Roman criticized Teigen & Kondo for their consumer product lines while promoting her own product line. I see no such reference in the cited article. Appears to be based her mentioning an upcoming collaboration with Materials, a kitchen products company. This was interpreted by OTHER media outlets like Refinery29 (not WaPo as cited) as a product line of her own. It was not. She promo'd their products on her show. Links: Tag: Visual edit