User contributions for FedTruther

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

12:34, 28 October 2015 Materialscientist talk contribs blocked FedTruther talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) ({{checkuserblock-account}})

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

23:3623:36, 27 October 2015 diff hist +399 Hillary Clinton email controversy Undid revision 687813627 by Wikidemon (talk) It is more accurate and detailed this way

00:4400:44, 13 April 2015 diff hist +1,105 Federal Reserve Undid revision 656198555 by Antandrus (talk)No, you do.There was more consensus in favor of adding it back after DanielRigal's revision, but it shouldn't be based solely on consensus anyways
00:2800:28, 13 April 2015 diff hist +1,105 Federal Reserve Undid revision 656111509 by Wikiisawesome (talk)

08:2008:20, 12 April 2015 diff hist −1 Statism No edit summary
08:2008:20, 12 April 2015 diff hist +1 Statism No edit summary
08:1908:19, 12 April 2015 diff hist −1 Statism No edit summary
08:1908:19, 12 April 2015 diff hist +1 Statism No edit summary
08:1908:19, 12 April 2015 diff hist −1 Statism No edit summary
08:1908:19, 12 April 2015 diff hist +1 Statism No edit summary
08:1808:18, 12 April 2015 diff hist −1 Statism No edit summary
08:1808:18, 12 April 2015 diff hist +1 Statism No edit summary
08:1808:18, 12 April 2015 diff hist −1 Statism No edit summary
08:1808:18, 12 April 2015 diff hist +1 Statism No edit summary
06:0406:04, 12 April 2015 diff hist +1,105 Federal Reserve Undid revision 656018233 by DanielRigal (talk) It looks fine to me as it provides an accurate introduction of Fed criticisms. I don't see this "consensus" anywhere, 3 people tried to add it.