User contributions for HenkeB

11 June 2010

• 10:1210:12, 11 June 2010 diff hist +3,029 m Talk:Pentium (original) →Discussion

6 June 2010

• 08:3608:36, 6 June 2010 diff hist −5 m Depletion-load NMOS logic →nMOS and back-gate bias

5 June 2010

• 22:5722:57, 5 June 2010 diff hist +508 Pentium (original) →Models: A few more details.
• 01:5001:50, 5 June 2010 diff hist −16 m Pentium (original) No edit summary
• 01:4801:48, 5 June 2010 diff hist +1,801 Pentium (original) A somewhat fuller description of the enhancements.

3 June 2010

• 10:3910:39, 3 June 2010 diff hist +239 Talk:Pentium (original) →Pentium (original of 1993)
• 10:3310:33, 3 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Pentium moved Talk:Pentium to Talk:Pentium (trademark): More explicit, to avoid confusion.
• 10:3310:33, 3 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Pentium moved Pentium to Pentium (trademark): More explicit, to avoid confusion.
• 10:3010:30, 3 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Pentium (original) moved Talk:P5 (microarchitecture) to Talk:Original Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): See talk and other edit-summary.
• 10:3010:30, 3 June 2010 diff hist −21,865 Pentium (original) moved P5 (microarchitecture) to Original Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): See talk and other edit-summary.
• 10:3010:30, 3 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Pentium (original) moved P5 (microarchitecture) to Original Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): See talk and other edit-summary.
• 10:2910:29, 3 June 2010 diff hist −43 Pentium (original) this article is about the original pentium *processor* (see talk) - please make *another* article about that non-existent abstract P5-naming if you cannot let this go...

2 June 2010

• 19:5419:54, 2 June 2010 diff hist +3,654 Talk:Pentium (original) moving the discussion to where it belongs.

1 June 2010

• 22:5522:55, 1 June 2010 diff hist −43 Pentium (original) Undid revision 365523939 by Uzume (talk)
• 22:5422:54, 1 June 2010 diff hist +444 User talk:HenkeB →Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture)
• 20:0320:03, 1 June 2010 diff hist +353 Talk:Pentium (original) →Pentium (original of 1993)
• 19:5119:51, 1 June 2010 diff hist −43 Pentium (original) Restoring the lead as well.
• 19:4619:46, 1 June 2010 diff hist +55 N Talk:Intel P5 (microarchitecture) moved Talk:Intel P5 (microarchitecture) to Talk:Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): A name on the article that makes a little more sense. The name "Pentium" should - of course - be part of the descriptiom of an article on the first design w...
• 19:4619:46, 1 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Pentium (original) moved Talk:Intel P5 (microarchitecture) to Talk:Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): A name on the article that makes a little more sense. The name "Pentium" should - of course - be part of the descriptiom of an article on the first design w...
• 19:4519:45, 1 June 2010 diff hist +50 N Intel P5 (microarchitecture) moved Intel P5 (microarchitecture) to Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): A name on the article that makes a little more sense. The name "Pentium" should - of course - be part of the descriptiom of an article on the first design with that n...
• 19:4519:45, 1 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Pentium (original) moved Intel P5 (microarchitecture) to Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture): A name on the article that makes a little more sense. The name "Pentium" should - of course - be part of the descriptiom of an article on the first design with that n...

10 May 2009

• 06:4206:42, 10 May 2009 diff hist +9 X86 →Basic properties of the architecture: Language.
• 05:5305:53, 10 May 2009 diff hist −30 X86 →Overview: Restoring relevant *basic* properties instead of particular instructions; SSE/x86-64 introduction dates mentioned multiple times. (Don't start another "discussion" 无名氏...!).

29 April 2009

• 17:3317:33, 29 April 2009 diff hist +133 I486 made my descriptive note on "tightly versus loosely pipelined" more complete and precise.
• 16:4116:41, 29 April 2009 diff hist +317 Talk:X86 →This is an insane x86 conversation I was forced into on my talk (I gave up at this point), it belongs either here or in the trash.
• 16:0616:06, 29 April 2009 diff hist +241 Talk:X86 →This is an insane x86 conversation I was forced into on my talk (I gave up at this point), it belongs either here or in the trash.
• 15:1415:14, 29 April 2009 diff hist +429 Talk:X86 →This is an insane x86 conversation I was forced into on my talk (I gave up at this point), it belongs either here or in the trash.
• 04:1004:10, 29 April 2009 diff hist +491 Talk:X86 the parody continues...

28 April 2009

• 21:5721:57, 28 April 2009 diff hist +24,911 Talk:X86 →This is an insane x86 conversation I was forced into on my talk (I gave up at this point), it belongs either here or in the trash.: new section
• 18:3918:39, 28 April 2009 diff hist +2,567 User talk:HenkeB →SIMD or not: here we go again...

26 April 2009

• 12:5812:58, 26 April 2009 diff hist +2,370 User talk:HenkeB →SIMD or not
• 00:0300:03, 26 April 2009 diff hist +324 Firmware added a note on the multi-level nature of firmware to avoid future misunderstandings.

25 April 2009

• 22:1022:10, 25 April 2009 diff hist +1,932 User talk:HenkeB →SIMD or not
• 12:2112:21, 25 April 2009 diff hist +1 m X86 →Basic properties of the architecture
• 12:1912:19, 25 April 2009 diff hist +32 X86 "memory operations" and "word size" far too vague; for ACTUAL CAPABILITIES see SIMD (128-bit lacks integer arithmetics, addressing, indexing etc, i.e. far from being general purpose - see notes).

24 April 2009

• 12:2412:24, 24 April 2009 diff hist +588 I486 Yes the 386 was somewhat pipelined, but so was the 286 and even the 8086, so the 386 was by no means the first - wrote an explanatory footnote what "tightly pipelined" usually means and implies.
• 11:0811:08, 24 April 2009 diff hist +57 X86 →Basic properties of the architecture: Mentioning 128 and 256-bit moves in the right context (please read before change 无名氏...)
• 10:3710:37, 24 April 2009 diff hist +1,212 User talk:Gribeco →"this is only true when a general-purpose operating system is also used"

23 April 2009

• 17:0617:06, 23 April 2009 diff hist −94 X86 "mentioned it anecdotally"? Then please stick to the subject... 256-bit "memory operations" (moves) are not a *basic* property of x86 but indeed part of SSEx - see SIMD paragraph!!
• 16:2516:25, 23 April 2009 diff hist +26 m User talk:Gribeco →"this is only true when a general-purpose operating system is also used"
• 16:1316:13, 23 April 2009 diff hist −133 X86 128-bit moves are not basic properties of x86 but a recent addition; bitwise XOR on full 128-bit registers just happens to be possible because it does not need a carry between bits (like ADD does).
• 16:0116:01, 23 April 2009 diff hist +221 User talk:Gribeco →"this is only true when a general-purpose operating system is also used": new section
• 13:4513:45, 23 April 2009 diff hist −42 X86 →Overview: This note was misplaced along "basic properties", moved it to the FP/SIMD section; notes on data-path read/writes (plauged by recentism) is on a lower level and should go elsewhere.
• 13:0713:07, 23 April 2009 diff hist +151 Firmware basic firmvare is typically considered a single program (but with many routines, structures etc) and it does not read "ONLY involved with"; a calculator may have "user" software as well as firmware.

21 April 2009

• 20:2320:23, 21 April 2009 diff hist +166 Machine code →Machine code instructions: rewrote much; tried to make the text a little more complete, coherent and correct .
• 19:1119:11, 21 April 2009 diff hist −599 Reduced instruction set computer made the "Stanford definition" a footnote, removed sloppy and partly redundant "history" section; please read the full article before reintroducing that section.
• 16:2316:23, 21 April 2009 diff hist +3,280 Intel 8085 Reordered, reduced some redundancy and instead incorporated more material on the programming model.
• 15:1115:11, 21 April 2009 diff hist +145 User talk:无名氏 No edit summary
• 13:1313:13, 21 April 2009 diff hist +921 X86 →Overview: We must distinguish between word- and integer-size here; added a FP and SIMD paragraph, and some additional detail.

19 April 2009

• 07:3507:35, 19 April 2009 diff hist −6 X86 →Basic properties of the architecture: The operand is the (data in the) memory location (not the expression denoting the memory location).