User contributions for JadamHosey

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

19:11, 13 November 2010 MuZemike talk contribs blocked JadamHosey talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TadjHolmes)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

17:3317:33, 12 November 2010 diff hist +70 VGChartz Confused by your comment but the current edit works fine - your NPD link wasn't right to start with and I've changed the adjust ref to Gamasutra as that is the source
17:0817:08, 12 November 2010 diff hist −35 VGChartz Undid revision 396345659 by DKqwerty (talk) - you're using the wrong reference for NPD vs VGC data
16:4816:48, 12 November 2010 diff hist +260 Talk:VGChartz →Persistant Removal of Critical Information
16:3716:37, 12 November 2010 diff hist +396 Talk:VGChartz →Persistant Removal of Critical Information
16:3516:35, 12 November 2010 diff hist +72 VGChartz Fixed NPD comparison reference
16:3216:32, 12 November 2010 diff hist +107 VGChartz Middle ground is reasonable but have added Walton's direct response to criticisms.
16:3016:30, 12 November 2010 diff hist +459 Talk:VGChartz →Persistant Removal of Critical Information
16:2316:23, 12 November 2010 diff hist +163 VGChartz Fixed second paragraph - the methodology is listed clearly on both the VGChartz site and Carless article to go beyond just retail extrapolation.
16:1216:12, 12 November 2010 diff hist +357 Talk:Brett Walton →Merge
16:0716:07, 12 November 2010 diff hist +283 Talk:Brett Walton →Merge
16:0616:06, 12 November 2010 diff hist −27 Brett Walton Undid revision 396335891 by Falcon9x5 (talk) so you want to go through the entire process again?
16:0316:03, 12 November 2010 diff hist +345 Talk:VGChartz →Persistant Removal of Critical Information
16:0016:00, 12 November 2010 diff hist +96 VGChartz Undid revision 396335219 - added methodology link
15:3615:36, 12 November 2010 diff hist −27 Brett Walton Undid revision 396331690 - again, notability is discussed on the talk page for the deletion and no consensus was reached. This is closed.
15:3115:31, 12 November 2010 diff hist +76 VGChartz Fixed opening paragraph
15:2715:27, 12 November 2010 diff hist −27 Brett Walton Undid revision 396329116 - the discussion was about whether the subject is notable or not and no consensus was reached.
15:1015:10, 12 November 2010 diff hist +6 VGChartz Fixed reference Tag: references removed
15:0715:07, 12 November 2010 diff hist +26 VGChartz Added reference to sources / methodology
14:1414:14, 12 November 2010 diff hist −27 Brett Walton Notability has already been discussed in Afd and no consensus was reached
14:1314:13, 12 November 2010 diff hist +663 VGChartz Undid revision 396317418 by Smartse (talk) Why isn't a list of senior staff who work on the site important?
13:5213:52, 12 November 2010 diff hist −46 VGChartz →gamrConnect
13:5013:50, 12 November 2010 diff hist +709 VGChartz Added team with reference
13:4613:46, 12 November 2010 diff hist +278 Talk:Brett Walton →Merge

12 November 2010