User contributions for Kruskall

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

14:5914:59, 15 September 2023 diff hist −115 m Onan Some portions from the short description/short introduction section of this entry should've been in the section that deals with the interpretation of the biblical story. Tag: Visual edit

20:5420:54, 3 December 2022 diff hist +418 Physiognomy I added more reliable sources. Also I've changed the wording; "the historical study of physiognomy" is not the same with physiognomy. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20:4220:42, 2 September 2022 diff hist −101 Onan "and disobeying a direct order from the Lord by being unwilling to father a child by his widowed sister-in-law." I removed this part because it is not relevant to the biblical context itself. The above quote is a terrible mistake, here's why: nowhere in the biblical story does Yahweh (or the Lord) directly order Onan to father a child by his widowed sister-in-law(according to the ancient custom of levirate marriage) nor indirectly, but Judah does(he orders directly to Onan to levirate for Tamar) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

00:0100:01, 23 June 2022 diff hist +2 m Onan I corrected a spelling mistake. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

23:3523:35, 22 June 2022 diff hist +68 m Onan I've changed the words "per se" with "itself". Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

01:3601:36, 21 June 2022 diff hist +1,091 m Onan I added more information. Tag: Visual edit
01:3301:33, 21 June 2022 diff hist +18,207 Onan I have removed almost all the material which is considered to not be relevant to this topic. For example I removed some paragrahphs which were more about a defense for a conservative traditionalistic Catholic point of view then biblical scholarship per se. Also, I add more relevant content to this topic and better bibliography. Of course much has to be done. Tag: Visual edit

02:1102:11, 10 April 2021 diff hist −250 Michael Lou Martin →Atheism: Nowhere in the previus source was stated that he was a Christ Myth theory advocate nor he advocated this position in his book The Case Against Christianity, he was just trying to make a case based on G. A. Wells Hyphotesis which Martin stated that it is controversial in the Conclusion paragraph of the 2nd Chapter of his book mdntioned above. Based on this I thought it would be resonable to remove that the claim that he was an advocate of Chist Myth Theory. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit