User contributions for Lumiere

23 February 2006

• 20:1820:18, 23 February 2006 diff hist −3,078 User talk:Lumiere →RPA: Everything I removed was either false or useless, including this post in my talk page
• 16:1716:17, 23 February 2006 diff hist +827 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test
• 16:0416:04, 23 February 2006 diff hist +525 User talk:Lumiere →RPA
• 15:5715:57, 23 February 2006 diff hist −113 User talk:Lumiere →RPA
• 15:5215:52, 23 February 2006 diff hist +707 User talk:Lumiere →RPA
• 14:4014:40, 23 February 2006 diff hist +122 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Andrew please stop the personal attacks
• 14:3914:39, 23 February 2006 diff hist −170 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Professor Josephson’s Website: Removed personal attacks
• 14:3514:35, 23 February 2006 diff hist −1,209 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Civility: removed personal attacks
• 14:3414:34, 23 February 2006 diff hist −6,732 Talk:Natasha Demkina →What Does Mr. Skolnick Prefer?: Removed personal attacks
• 14:2914:29, 23 February 2006 diff hist −216 Talk:Natasha Demkina →"5 out of 7": Removed personal attacks (kept strong wordings about others comment that were borderline)
• 14:2414:24, 23 February 2006 diff hist −2,333 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Serious Concerns About Biased References: Removed personal attacks
• 14:0514:05, 23 February 2006 diff hist −555 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Fixed and added references: Removed personal attacks
• 11:0611:06, 23 February 2006 diff hist +1 m Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test
• 10:5410:54, 23 February 2006 diff hist +9 Natasha Demkina Added NPOV tag for the specific section where the problem lies.
• 10:4910:49, 23 February 2006 diff hist +8 Natasha Demkina It is against well established convention, if not against policy, to remove a POV tag when there is obviously a big dispute.
• 10:4010:40, 23 February 2006 diff hist +294 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test
• 06:1506:15, 23 February 2006 diff hist −1 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test
• 06:1406:14, 23 February 2006 diff hist +50 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test
• 06:1106:11, 23 February 2006 diff hist +562 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test
• 04:2704:27, 23 February 2006 diff hist +495 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 04:1704:17, 23 February 2006 diff hist −1 Natasha Demkina →Appearance in New York
• 04:0304:03, 23 February 2006 diff hist +876 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 03:3403:34, 23 February 2006 diff hist +8 Natasha Demkina Added POV tag per talk page.
• 03:2403:24, 23 February 2006 diff hist +297 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 03:1703:17, 23 February 2006 diff hist +2 Natasha Demkina →Appearance in New York
• 03:1603:16, 23 February 2006 diff hist −28 Natasha Demkina →Appearance in New York
• 03:0803:08, 23 February 2006 diff hist +263 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 03:0203:02, 23 February 2006 diff hist +186 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 02:4902:49, 23 February 2006 diff hist +1,127 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 02:1002:10, 23 February 2006 diff hist 0 m Natasha Demkina →Appearance in New York
• 02:0902:09, 23 February 2006 diff hist −99 Natasha Demkina Please let us get a consensus on the talk page about this important addition before we implement it.
• 02:0602:06, 23 February 2006 diff hist +361 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Professor Josephson’s Website
• 02:0402:04, 23 February 2006 diff hist −345 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Corrected inaccurate description of test: Moved misplaced section
• 02:0302:03, 23 February 2006 diff hist +31 Talk:Natasha Demkina →Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 02:0202:02, 23 February 2006 diff hist +356 Talk:Natasha Demkina Insinuation that the critics are the result of a systematic bias.
• 01:5601:56, 23 February 2006 diff hist −99 Natasha Demkina →Appearance in New York: The purpose of this sentence was not clear. It insinuates that the critic is the outcome of a systematic bias.

22 February 2006

• 22:5522:55, 22 February 2006 diff hist +19 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Painting the fence white
• 22:2922:29, 22 February 2006 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Painting the fence white
• 22:2922:29, 22 February 2006 diff hist +102 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Painting the fence white
• 21:3921:39, 22 February 2006 diff hist 0 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Painting the fence white
• 21:3721:37, 22 February 2006 diff hist +830 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Painting the fence white
• 20:1420:14, 22 February 2006 diff hist +143 User talk:DreamGuy →Someone complaining about a personal attack that wasn't to try to confuse others
• 12:2012:20, 22 February 2006 diff hist −307 User talk:William M. Connolley Thanks again!
• 12:1912:19, 22 February 2006 diff hist +307 User talk:William M. Connolley Thanks!
• 12:0612:06, 22 February 2006 diff hist +305 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Over-referencing
• 11:5011:50, 22 February 2006 diff hist +393 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Over-referencing
• 10:2010:20, 22 February 2006 diff hist +111 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Over-referencing
• 10:1410:14, 22 February 2006 diff hist −5 m Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Over-referencing
• 10:1310:13, 22 February 2006 diff hist +307 User talk:William M. Connolley Sorry if the question was misinterpreted.
• 10:0310:03, 22 February 2006 diff hist +529 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Over-referencing