User contributions for NettingFish15019

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

10:5110:51, 4 March 2021 diff hist +68 User:NettingFish15019 No edit summary current Tag: Visual edit

15:1115:11, 3 March 2021 diff hist +12 User talk:STSC →Talk Page Consensus
15:1015:10, 3 March 2021 diff hist +724 User talk:STSC →Talk Page Consensus: new section
14:0414:04, 3 March 2021 diff hist +775 Rising Sun Flag Undid revision 1010035195 by NettingFish15019 (talk) Edit summary was only half-filled. Meant to say there seems to be much discussion after your own comment, which states "you cant just unilaterally assert a consensus has been reached when none has been". Per WP:NOCON, the version before the dispute should be retained (the one with the lede). Regardless, it seems most editors are in favor of retaining the lede. Tags: Undo Reverted
14:0314:03, 3 March 2021 diff hist −775 Rising Sun Flag Undid revision 1010034433 by NettingFish15019 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
13:5813:58, 3 March 2021 diff hist +775 Rising Sun Flag Undid revision 1009980834 by XiAdonis (talk) There seems to be much discussion after your own comment, which states "you cant just unilaterally assert a consensus has been reached when none has been Tags: Undo Reverted
00:4400:44, 3 March 2021 diff hist +775 Rising Sun Flag Undid revision 1009829808 by XiAdonis (talk) Talk page discussion suggests that there was no consensus for the lead to be changed Tags: Undo Reverted

00:4300:43, 2 March 2021 diff hist +7 Wikipedia:Teahouse →No talk page discussion?
00:4000:40, 2 March 2021 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Teahouse →No talk page discussion?
00:4000:40, 2 March 2021 diff hist +702 Wikipedia:Teahouse →No talk page discussion?

12:5112:51, 1 March 2021 diff hist +758 Linguistic purism in Korean Added new sources Tag: Visual edit
12:3812:38, 1 March 2021 diff hist −39 Free North Korea Radio Undid revision 1009586689 by Daiichi1 (talk) Nowhere in the article does it suggest the broadcaster is a creator of propaganda. If you can find a source to back it up, feel free to add it to the article and then re-add the category. Tag: Undo
12:3212:32, 1 March 2021 diff hist +31 Wikipedia:Teahouse →No talk page discussion?
12:3112:31, 1 March 2021 diff hist +667 Wikipedia:Teahouse →No talk page discussion?: new section

16:2316:23, 27 February 2021 diff hist −18 m Gimbap Got rid of "italics italics" in intro. Also referred to alternative spelling 'kimbap', the McCune-Reischauer spelling Tag: Visual edit
16:2116:21, 27 February 2021 diff hist +1,696 Talk:Gimbap →History (Language Used): new section
16:1216:12, 27 February 2021 diff hist +11 Gimbap →History: Not edit-warring as it's only 3 reverts. Anyways, added a discussion to the talk page and added a 'discuss' tag to the article Tag: Visual edit
15:4215:42, 27 February 2021 diff hist +418 Gimbap Undid revision 1009248951 by Daiichi1 (talk) If you look at the definition for 'minority view' on the WP page, it links to 'fringe theory'. But more to the point, there are ample sources here that lend support to both theories, as already discussed in the talk page, which suggests neither are 'fringe theories'; getting rid of any leading language is necessary to maintain WP:BALANCE and WP:IMPARTIAL. Tags: Undo Reverted
14:5414:54, 27 February 2021 diff hist +452 Gimbap Undid revision 1009236721 by Daiichi1 (talk) It's not WP:FALSEBALANCE, which only applies to fringe theories; a simple google alone shows that the origins are up to debate and some controversy. The talkpage for this site has already undergone ample discussion on which theory is 'better'. The revision doesn't endorse either theory, but just lists them in line with WP:NPOV (specifically WP:BALANCE and WP:IMPARTIAL). Tag: Undo
10:3310:33, 27 February 2021 diff hist +452 Gimbap →Etymology: Reworded to prevent mentions of 'the most accepted theory' as was previously applied to both the 'Japanese colonial' and 'bokssam' theory in this article. I think it would be better for WP:NPOV. Added sources, and deleted a source which didn't support the previous statement. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

04:1504:15, 24 February 2021 diff hist +1,968 Talk:Comfort women →Misrepresentation of C. Sarah Soh
03:4803:48, 24 February 2021 diff hist +262 User talk:Daniel Case →Question
03:4403:44, 24 February 2021 diff hist +1,442 Talk:Comfort women →Relevance of Ramseyer
03:4403:44, 24 February 2021 diff hist +135 User talk:Daniel Case →Question
03:2803:28, 24 February 2021 diff hist +115 User talk:NettingFish15019 →Was it I whom you meant this for?
03:2803:28, 24 February 2021 diff hist +165 User talk:NettingFish15019 →Was it I whom you meant this for?
03:2803:28, 24 February 2021 diff hist +3 User talk:Daniel Case →Question
01:1101:11, 24 February 2021 diff hist +919 User talk:Daniel Case →Question: new section

05:2605:26, 23 February 2021 diff hist +724 Talk:Comfort women →Proposal
05:1105:11, 23 February 2021 diff hist +1,895 Talk:Comfort women →Relevance of Ramseyer
02:5802:58, 23 February 2021 diff hist −763 Comfort women Undid revision 1008393962 by Bavio the Benighted (talk) Onus is on those who want to include it to get consensus (WP:ONUS); without it, the content should be removed. This talk has been inactive for about a week; please stop beating the dead horse (WP:DEADHORSE). Tag: Undo
02:5402:54, 23 February 2021 diff hist −69 User:NettingFish15019 Sorry, I'm not sure if there's a tag that allows me to say 'semi-retired'. If there is, please let me know on my talk page. Tags: Manual revert Visual edit

03:5603:56, 19 February 2021 diff hist +69 User:NettingFish15019 No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched
03:4703:47, 19 February 2021 diff hist −1,774 Korea under Japanese rule →Comfort women: Added source and deleted section that was previously deleted, as mentioned in previous edit summary. Tag: Visual edit
03:4403:44, 19 February 2021 diff hist +2,746 Korea under Japanese rule Undid revision 1007448679 by XiAdonis (talk) Undid deletion of substantial portions from the section, though left the deletion of the reference to Sankei as the user did. Wording in the portions restored corresponds to the sources cited. Tag: Undo

11:1511:15, 10 February 2021 diff hist +4,068 Korea under Japanese rule →Comfort women: Added new sources and fixed language to reflect what the sources state Tag: Visual edit
10:4110:41, 10 February 2021 diff hist −156 Kang Chang-il →Political career: Not included in source Tag: Visual edit
10:3510:35, 10 February 2021 diff hist −1,375 Malaysia–South Korea relations Undid revision 1005783448 by Yasuo Miyakawa (talk) No indication that this led to any lasting consequences (seems singular. See WP:Recentism). It also doesn't seem to improve the article as a whole, especially to warrant its own section (See WP:ONUS and WP:UNDUE). Tag: Undo

07:4307:43, 6 February 2021 diff hist +3,696 Talk:Comfort women →Lead sentence
06:1706:17, 6 February 2021 diff hist +87 Talk:Comfort women →Relevance of Ramseyer
06:1406:14, 6 February 2021 diff hist +3,705 Talk:Comfort women →Relevance of Ramseyer
04:4604:46, 6 February 2021 diff hist +472 Talk:Comfort women →Lead sentence
04:2404:24, 6 February 2021 diff hist +1,641 Talk:Comfort women →Lead sentence

4 March 2021

3 March 2021

2 March 2021

1 March 2021

27 February 2021

24 February 2021

23 February 2021

19 February 2021

16 February 2021

10 February 2021

6 February 2021