User contributions for Rachel.Greenberg
A user with 89 edits. Account created on 9 February 2009.
16 February 2009
15 February 2009
- 22:5822:58, 15 February 2009 diff hist +948 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Conflict of interest, again; will someone please take a decision on this matter?
- 22:4622:46, 15 February 2009 diff hist +2,095 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Conflict of interest, again; will someone please take a decision on this matter?
- 22:0922:09, 15 February 2009 diff hist +478 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Conflict of interest, again; will someone please take a decision on this matter?
- 22:0422:04, 15 February 2009 diff hist +3,063 User talk:Rachel.Greenberg →3RR issue at Dead Sea scrolls
- 21:5921:59, 15 February 2009 diff hist +229 User talk:William M. Connolley →False accusations that I'm a sockpuppet
- 21:5321:53, 15 February 2009 diff hist +4,493 Dead Sea Scrolls No edit summary
- 21:3021:30, 15 February 2009 diff hist +24 User talk:Valley2city/Archive 5 →Where I am -- my IP address
- 21:3021:30, 15 February 2009 diff hist +3,764 User talk:Valley2city/Archive 5 →Where I am -- my IP address
- 20:5920:59, 15 February 2009 diff hist −17 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Conflict of interest, again; will someone please take a decision on this matter?
- 20:5820:58, 15 February 2009 diff hist +30 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Conflict of interest, again; will someone please take a decision on this matter?
- 20:5720:57, 15 February 2009 diff hist +2,309 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →why he does what he does
14 February 2009
- 20:2420:24, 14 February 2009 diff hist +2,501 User talk:Rachel.Greenberg →3RR issue at Dead Sea scrolls
- 05:3505:35, 14 February 2009 diff hist +522 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 01:3001:30, 14 February 2009 diff hist +139 Dead Sea Scrolls →Controversy involving recent and upcoming exhibitions
- 01:2801:28, 14 February 2009 diff hist +3,593 Dead Sea Scrolls Reinserted and added paragraph to section deleted by (talk)~~~~
- 01:1901:19, 14 February 2009 diff hist +4 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 01:1601:16, 14 February 2009 diff hist +281 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 01:1101:11, 14 February 2009 diff hist +455 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 01:0801:08, 14 February 2009 diff hist +3,212 Dead Sea Scrolls Reinserted section removed pursuant to personal opinion of one individual. Isn't this issue going to be mediated? Discuss before deleting please.
13 February 2009
- 21:1721:17, 13 February 2009 diff hist −1 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 21:1621:16, 13 February 2009 diff hist +392 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 21:1121:11, 13 February 2009 diff hist +449 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 21:0221:02, 13 February 2009 diff hist +3,212 Dead Sea Scrolls Inserted improved version of section repeatedly deleted by IsraelXKV8R, who is personally involved in controversy and violates conflict of interest rule each time he deletes section; see discussion
- 20:4920:49, 13 February 2009 diff hist +1,746 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 20:0920:09, 13 February 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 20:0820:08, 13 February 2009 diff hist +10 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 20:0820:08, 13 February 2009 diff hist +29 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 20:0620:06, 13 February 2009 diff hist +15 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 20:0520:05, 13 February 2009 diff hist +2,389 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Uneven presentation of pertinent information
- 19:3719:37, 13 February 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 19:3719:37, 13 February 2009 diff hist +654 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →good for the goose, good for the gander
- 04:2304:23, 13 February 2009 diff hist +204 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →let's stick to the scrolls, not traveling exhibitions
- 04:1804:18, 13 February 2009 diff hist +548 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →no mention of the essenes?
- 03:5603:56, 13 February 2009 diff hist +2,899 Dead Sea Scrolls Re-inserted section repeatedly deleted (see below) by IsraelXKV8R, who is personally involved in Scrolls exhibit controversy and violates the conflict of interest rule each time he deletes section
- 03:4403:44, 13 February 2009 diff hist +1,723 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →Mediation as potential next step
- 02:1602:16, 13 February 2009 diff hist +284 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →why scholars are skeptical of wikipedia
- 02:1402:14, 13 February 2009 diff hist +770 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →let's stick to the scrolls, not traveling exhibitions
- 02:0302:03, 13 February 2009 diff hist +828 User talk:Valley2city/Archive 5 →DYK for A Cat in the Brain
12 February 2009
- 21:5621:56, 12 February 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:5521:55, 12 February 2009 diff hist +13 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:5421:54, 12 February 2009 diff hist −8 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:5421:54, 12 February 2009 diff hist −106 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:5221:52, 12 February 2009 diff hist +116 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:4921:49, 12 February 2009 diff hist +69 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:4721:47, 12 February 2009 diff hist +549 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:3821:38, 12 February 2009 diff hist +1,157 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →why scholars are skeptical of wikipedia
- 21:1721:17, 12 February 2009 diff hist +7 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:1621:16, 12 February 2009 diff hist +129 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
- 21:1321:13, 12 February 2009 diff hist +2 Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls →request for mediation
