User contributions for Science 2.0
Results for Science 2.0 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 78 edits. Account created on 30 June 2011.
11 September 2012
- 16:4716:47, 11 September 2012 diff hist −3,280 Science 2.0 Oddly written. The citation for history was 2009 but Science 2.0 was created in 2006. General misunderstanding of the movement, it was before open science. Corrected Burke's NY Acad of Science link
- 15:1215:12, 11 September 2012 diff hist −142 Science 2.0 →External links: reorganized extrernal links, since this looked like it was written by a marketing person at PLoS
- 15:0915:09, 11 September 2012 diff hist −46 Science 2.0 →Proliferation of Science 2.0 on the web: reorganized the order, since Science 2.o being at the bottom of Science 2.0 on Wikipedia is odd
9 June 2012
- 00:4700:47, 9 June 2012 diff hist −116 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
- 00:4300:43, 9 June 2012 diff hist −21 Talk:Science 2.0 →Science 2.0 the concept and Science 2.0 the website are not the same
8 June 2012
- 23:2023:20, 8 June 2012 diff hist +472 Talk:Science 2.0 →Science 2.0 the concept and Science 2.0 the website are not the same
- 23:1223:12, 8 June 2012 diff hist +832 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
- 17:0517:05, 8 June 2012 diff hist −13 Science 2.0 Added POV back in until the accuracy issues are resolved.
- 17:0117:01, 8 June 2012 diff hist +895 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
7 June 2012
- 17:4617:46, 7 June 2012 diff hist +679 Talk:Science 2.0 →Trademark
- 17:3617:36, 7 June 2012 diff hist +91 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
- 17:3617:36, 7 June 2012 diff hist +1,332 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
- 17:2017:20, 7 June 2012 diff hist +630 User talk:Science 2.0 →Are you
6 June 2012
- 23:0023:00, 6 June 2012 diff hist +208 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
- 15:4515:45, 6 June 2012 diff hist +614 Talk:Science 2.0 →Revamp
- 15:4115:41, 6 June 2012 diff hist −19,728 Science 2.0 Undid revision 496222798 by Tomwsulcer (talk) This is more subjective than anything. What controversy, except for 2 editors on Wikipedia?
5 June 2012
- 15:5615:56, 5 June 2012 diff hist +91 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science 2.0 (website) →Science 2.0 (website)
- 15:5515:55, 5 June 2012 diff hist +304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science 2.0 (website) →Science 2.0 (website)
- 15:4415:44, 5 June 2012 diff hist +632 Talk:Science 2.0 →Trademark
- 03:0803:08, 5 June 2012 diff hist +11,090 Science 2.0 Put POV back in. If this is being discussed, it should not be split first and ignore concerns about the accuracy. ~~~~
- 03:0503:05, 5 June 2012 diff hist −11,082 m Science 2.0 Added POV back in ~~~~
- 02:5802:58, 5 June 2012 diff hist +11,090 Science 2.0 Undid revision 496046117 by Discospinster (talk) If it's being discussed, it should not be bullied into existence first.
- 02:5602:56, 5 June 2012 diff hist +1,512 Talk:Science 2.0 →Propose article move
4 June 2012
- 22:0822:08, 4 June 2012 diff hist +650 Talk:Science 2.0 →Propose article move
- 21:4621:46, 4 June 2012 diff hist +632 Talk:Science 2.0 →Trademark
- 19:0019:00, 4 June 2012 diff hist +1 Science 2.0 No edit summary
- 19:0019:00, 4 June 2012 diff hist +9 Science 2.0 Adding POV tag to show that the latest edits are not authentic.
- 15:1515:15, 4 June 2012 diff hist +986 Talk:Science 2.0 →Propose article move
- 01:5201:52, 4 June 2012 diff hist +244 Talk:Science 2.0 →Link to Trademark Owner Of "Science 2.0" And Photo Of Registration Certificate
- 01:4101:41, 4 June 2012 diff hist +677 Talk:Science 2.0 →Propose article move
3 June 2012
- 19:2119:21, 3 June 2012 diff hist +1 User talk:Science 2.0 →Issue raised at our conflict of interest noticeboard
- 19:2119:21, 3 June 2012 diff hist +328 User talk:Science 2.0 →Issue raised at our conflict of interest noticeboard
- 19:0219:02, 3 June 2012 diff hist +1,045 Talk:Science 2.0 →Propose article move
1 June 2012
- 22:4122:41, 1 June 2012 diff hist +455 Talk:Science 2.0 →Conflict of interest and major change in this article since February
31 May 2012
- 14:5714:57, 31 May 2012 diff hist +91 User talk:Science 2.0 →May 2012
- 14:5714:57, 31 May 2012 diff hist +94 User talk:Science 2.0 →May 2012
- 14:5614:56, 31 May 2012 diff hist +252 User talk:Science 2.0 →May 2012: Noted that the revision in question was not done by me.
- 14:3414:34, 31 May 2012 diff hist −1,663 Science 2.0 Deleted duplicated sentence about Web 2.0, deleted a quote from an unspecified source with no first, deleted what seems to be open science hijacking of Science 2.0
- 14:1014:10, 31 May 2012 diff hist +62 User talk:Doug Weller →Thanks for the welconme: new section
9 April 2012
- 14:5414:54, 9 April 2012 diff hist −102 Science 2.0 Undid revision 485890794 by 155.223.40.1 (talk) - this is promoting your website, not a Science 2.0-related app
5 April 2012
- 02:2902:29, 5 April 2012 diff hist −102 m Science 2.0 Undid revision 484695588 by 155.223.40.1 (talk) undid link spam
5 March 2012
- 19:2919:29, 5 March 2012 diff hist 0 m Science 2.0 changed website to websites
- 19:2819:28, 5 March 2012 diff hist −12 m Science 2.0 changed website to websites.
- 19:2719:27, 5 March 2012 diff hist 0 m Science 2.0 corrected date, to 2006 from 1996
- 19:0319:03, 5 March 2012 diff hist −103 Science 2.0 Removed incorrect application link
22 February 2012
- 16:4716:47, 22 February 2012 diff hist −126 Science 2.0 Cleaned up intro verbage
- 16:4216:42, 22 February 2012 diff hist −181 m Science 2.0 →Examples: corrected verbage in 'example applications'
16 February 2012
- 21:5521:55, 16 February 2012 diff hist −47 Science 2.0 Open Science is already linked under Main so putting it in a separate section is unnecessary
- 21:5321:53, 16 February 2012 diff hist 0 m Science 2.0 →See also: Open Science is big and no one has heard of e-science so open science should be first
- 21:5221:52, 16 February 2012 diff hist −117 m Science 2.0 →Further reading: Removed philosophical opinion link, we should keep this to actual methodology
