User contributions for Sjc5912

5 March 2021

• 01:2101:21, 5 March 2021 diff hist −415 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010346304 by Wot3t2 (talk) The secondary source in question makes false claims about this controversy. Fake news is itself highly controversial. It belongs in this section. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:1401:14, 5 March 2021 diff hist −415 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010345008 by Wot3t2 (talk) You don't get to decide what is "the" controversy. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:0801:08, 5 March 2021 diff hist −415 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010343982 by Wot3t2 (talk) You also removed information that is relevant to this controversy. Adding a citation does not negate that. False reporting on this controversy is relevant to this section... Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:0401:04, 5 March 2021 diff hist −348 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010342809 by Wot3t2 (talk) The report continues to be cited so it is not moot. Tag: Reverted
• 00:4100:41, 5 March 2021 diff hist +370 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010340589 by Wot3t2 (talk) It is relevent. Tag: Undo
• 00:2300:23, 5 March 2021 diff hist +370 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010337245 by Wot3t2 (talk) Cited content should not be removed without a legitimate reason. The of the report is a Barnard student which is part of Columbia University. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 00:1300:13, 5 March 2021 diff hist +370 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010336377 by Wot3t2 (talk) The reporting on the controversy in the school's newspaper is relevant as this is supposedly a controversy about the school and the university to which the newspaper belongs. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 00:0200:02, 5 March 2021 diff hist +369 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010334989 by Wot3t2 (talk) It is relevant. Tags: Undo Reverted

4 March 2021

• 23:4823:48, 4 March 2021 diff hist +370 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010330880 by Wot3t2 (talk) Evidence of false reporting on this controversy by a university newspaper belongs in this section. This is especially true when the false report in question serves as evidence for much of this section as that is fruit of the poisonous tree. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 20:5420:54, 4 March 2021 diff hist −374 Columbia University School of Professional Studies I agree with a previous editor that the Sports Management ranking can be removed. Tag: Visual edit
• 20:5220:52, 4 March 2021 diff hist +873 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1010076210 by Wot3t2 (talk) I agree that the Sports Management ranking can be removed as it is from 2016. I will remove making that change next. Rankings are common features on Wikipedia pages and the respective publications are cited by name and with a citation. Tag: Undo
• 20:3820:38, 4 March 2021 diff hist +77 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Added citations needed tags to statements in the Controversy section. Tag: Visual edit
• 20:3120:31, 4 March 2021 diff hist +330 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Added a faculty member to the notable faculty section. Fixed a typo in the notable faculty section. Tag: Visual edit

2 March 2021

• 01:4701:47, 2 March 2021 diff hist +826 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1009734037 by Wot3t2 (talk) Coverage in major news publications does not constitute "trivial coverage" and in none of the sources is it limited to a "single sentence." Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:3901:39, 2 March 2021 diff hist +826 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1009732558 by Wot3t2 (talk) Cite the policy and relevant section you are basing removal off of. Otherwise this appears to be vandalism Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:3001:30, 2 March 2021 diff hist +826 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1009728380 by Wot3t2 (talk) In neither of the two secondary syndicated news sources was mention of this notable individual limited to "a sentence." Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:1501:15, 2 March 2021 diff hist +826 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1009728380 by Wot3t2 (talk) This post follows the guidelines as set forth here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people). Moderator requested to address vandalism of this cite. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 00:5400:54, 2 March 2021 diff hist +826 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Addressed citation concerns by another editor that there were too few secondary sources for this notable person. Citations now include the USA Today and AP News as well as the official website of the New York Jets. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 00:0800:08, 2 March 2021 diff hist +757 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1009718478 by Wot3t2 (talk) Meets standards of a notability section on Wikipedia (see herehttps://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#:~:text=11%20Notes-,Basic%20guideline,be%20combined%20to%20show%20notability.) Citations include the Associated Press as well as relevant organizations. Tags: Undo Reverted

1 March 2021

• 23:5123:51, 1 March 2021 diff hist +757 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Added a notable person to the Notable Faculty section. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 22:4722:47, 1 March 2021 diff hist +359 Columbia University School of Professional Studies →Controversy: Added in latest information about the school's graduate numbers in relation to the school overall, replacing specious and uncited data. Changes now include the most up to date numbers using official sources. Tag: Visual edit
• 21:1121:11, 1 March 2021 diff hist −1,984 Columbia University School of Professional Studies →Controversy: Section deleted. Among factual inaccuracies, including the proportion of degrees awarded by the school in relation to the university, it is based on outdated information. Drawing on links from years ago. If the subject matter were a true controversy relevant today, it would cite sources that are years old as well as sources from credible publications not directly affiliated with the subject. This page appears to be under attack. Moderation is needed.
• 18:5818:58, 1 March 2021 diff hist −816 Columbia University School of Professional Studies I believe this section should be cut entirely as I mentioned in another edit summary I posted moments ago. This section relies excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject. In fact, it relies on sources exclusively associated with the subject. Cut for concision and to remove hyperbole and bias until a moderator can intervene. I also fixed grammatical errors. Tag: Reverted
• 18:4318:43, 1 March 2021 diff hist −17 Columbia University School of Professional Studies →Controversy: This section should be cut. Seems it's being written and insisted upon by an editor(s) close to an internal debate over resources that has not been fit for any credible news source beyond Columbia to report on thus far. A "Controversy" section implies that the world beyond the school cares or should be made to care about it. The contents of this section meet neither bar. A moderator would be most welcome.
• 09:4409:44, 1 March 2021 diff hist +1,535 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Started a "Notable Faculty" page Tag: Visual edit
• 09:0509:05, 1 March 2021 diff hist +356 m Peter T. Coleman (academic) Added a sentence related to his work with the NECR MS program. Tag: Visual edit
• 05:4105:41, 1 March 2021 diff hist +419 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Undid revision 1009548805 by Wot3t2 (talk) Changes were made to provide a more balanced view of page overall given that previous iterations were highly slanted against it. It included info germane to the subject using citations from both primary and secondary sources. It maintained criticism while removing irrelevant info. It appears that 1+ users are out to misinform readers by excluding any positive qualities and focusing heavily on deltas. Tag: Undo
• 03:4003:40, 1 March 2021 diff hist 0 m Columbia University School of Professional Studies →Rankings Tag: Visual edit
• 00:4500:45, 1 March 2021 diff hist +400 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Added in ranking information for the Sports Management program and other minor edits to the section. Tag: Visual edit
• 00:2400:24, 1 March 2021 diff hist +286 m Columbia University School of Professional Studies Cited rankings information. Tag: Visual edit
• 00:2000:20, 1 March 2021 diff hist +187 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Added in some ranking information available for the school. Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 00:0800:08, 1 March 2021 diff hist −787 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Cut irrelevant details while keeping the central aspects of this criticism. Tag: Visual edit

28 February 2021

• 23:5923:59, 28 February 2021 diff hist −107 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Edited section to more accurately and concisely reflect the contents of the survey. Tag: Visual edit

13 February 2021

• 17:5117:51, 13 February 2021 diff hist +7 m Columbia University School of Professional Studies →Student Outcomes Tags: Reverted Visual edit

12 February 2021

• 20:2320:23, 12 February 2021 diff hist +1,902 Columbia University School of Professional Studies Added a section with the latest syndicated data which shows how graduates of the program fair on the job market at graduation and how they compare with graduates of a peer school within the University, Columbia's Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. Tag: Visual edit
• 16:5316:53, 12 February 2021 diff hist +1 m Columbia University School of Professional Studies Fixed a typo. Tag: Visual edit
• 16:5216:52, 12 February 2021 diff hist +1 m Columbia University School of Professional Studies Fixed a typo. Tag: Visual edit
• 16:4416:44, 12 February 2021 diff hist −1,215 Columbia University School of Professional Studies →Controversy: Fixed grammatical typos and cut unnecessary details. Some of the sources cited in this section exhibit significant bias, including one that was an opinion piece written by a student. Tag: Visual edit