User contributions for Spectral sequence

18 May 2014

• 21:3521:35, 18 May 2014 diff hist +37 User:Spectral sequence retired alternative account current
• 21:3421:34, 18 May 2014 diff hist −1,341 User talk:Spectral sequence retired - archiving
• 21:3321:33, 18 May 2014 diff hist +1,336 User talk:Spectral sequence/Archive1 archive to end 2013

22 October 2013

• 19:3419:34, 22 October 2013 diff hist +695 Wikipedia talk:Flow →User "expectations": Why not share that pretty good idea with the community of existing users right now
• 06:4006:40, 22 October 2013 diff hist +1,532 Wikipedia talk:Flow →User "expectations": what established the link between surveying new users and documentation of research

21 October 2013

• 21:1521:15, 21 October 2013 diff hist +392 Wikipedia talk:Flow →User "expectations": Is that "pretty good idea" written down anywhere?
• 18:1318:13, 21 October 2013 diff hist +553 Wikipedia talk:Flow →User "expectations": Seems surprisingly laid-back
• 06:3706:37, 21 October 2013 diff hist +737 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Editing the comments of others: A suggestion for hiding comments

20 October 2013

• 09:0709:07, 20 October 2013 diff hist −14 m Wikipedia talk:Flow Undid revision 577949626 by 173.87.171.94 (talk)

19 October 2013

• 20:5120:51, 19 October 2013 diff hist +390 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Mathematics markup: Probably best to concentrate on fixing that round-trip problem first
• 20:4220:42, 19 October 2013 diff hist +679 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Mathematics markup: The user's requirement is to enter the formula, display and edit it: currently no method is working for that
• 19:5919:59, 19 October 2013 diff hist +120 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Mathematics markup: additional
• 19:5319:53, 19 October 2013 diff hist +453 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Mathematics markup: further markup not rendering correctly
• 06:3006:30, 19 October 2013 diff hist +712 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Experiences with the Labs Sandbox: templates are being expanded into wikitext on a one-way trip
• 06:2506:25, 19 October 2013 diff hist +304 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Mathematics markup: Sorry, {{tl|math}} still isn't working
• 06:2206:22, 19 October 2013 diff hist +65 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Only replying to the original post, and no possibility to have subsections?: rename for clarity

18 October 2013

• 21:4221:42, 18 October 2013 diff hist +373 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Only replying to the original post, and no possibility to have subsections?: Now you see <math>, now you don't

17 October 2013

• 17:2117:21, 17 October 2013 diff hist +179 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Wikitext: I look forward to hearing what your plans are
• 17:1217:12, 17 October 2013 diff hist +495 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Wikitext: there is an argument for wikitext editing in Flow
• 16:3416:34, 17 October 2013 diff hist +300 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Wikitext: For the gory details on mathematics markup under Flow, see ...
• 16:2916:29, 17 October 2013 diff hist +790 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Wikitext: my interpretation of what I was told by various WMF staffers at an early stage in the design process

16 October 2013

• 20:2520:25, 16 October 2013 diff hist +272 Wikipedia talk:Flow →MVP questions: A gentle reminder that Parsoid compatibility is not just about templates
• 17:3217:32, 16 October 2013 diff hist +327 Wikipedia talk:Flow I do wish that we could agree not to exaggerate other users' comments
• 06:5006:50, 16 October 2013 diff hist +19 Wikipedia:Flow/Top templates →Other needed templates: I see Template:Math a lot
• 06:4806:48, 16 October 2013 diff hist +109 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: Fourthly
• 06:4306:43, 16 October 2013 diff hist +655 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: I think that's a mistake for several reasons
• 06:3606:36, 16 October 2013 diff hist +619 User talk:MPinchuk (WMF) (usurped) →Ideology: Then I for one have been mistaken about the grand design

15 October 2013

• 21:5821:58, 15 October 2013 diff hist +25 Wikipedia:Flow/Newsletter added self
• 20:5820:58, 15 October 2013 diff hist +293 Wikipedia talk:Flow : when I said "in use or likely to be needed in the future", I said, and meant, something different from "every use case anyone can ''think'' of"
• 20:5320:53, 15 October 2013 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Flow →Planning the communications: better
• 20:5220:52, 15 October 2013 diff hist +1,004 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Community engagement strategy: Is there a plan for the communications plan?
• 20:4420:44, 15 October 2013 diff hist +447 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: The first step seems to be getting the workflows ''documented''
• 20:4020:40, 15 October 2013 diff hist +310 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Please provide indexing "table-of-contents"-like functionality: It raises the question of what the unit of presentation would be for a Flow structured discussion
• 20:3820:38, 15 October 2013 diff hist +267 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Flow software questions: Glad to hear it. It's also consistent with the spirit of CCA on attribution
• 16:3616:36, 15 October 2013 diff hist +641 Wikipedia talk:Flow →A comment on engagement: I hope we all agree that all the conversations between WMF staffers and editors should be on the basis of a common standard of collegiality and collaboration
• 06:4306:43, 15 October 2013 diff hist +797 Wikipedia talk:Flow →A comment on engagement: I would have supported the response by Jorm (WMF) if he had confined himself to answering the point about "servants"

14 October 2013

• 21:1421:14, 14 October 2013 diff hist +151 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: Thank you for clarifying that
• 20:3120:31, 14 October 2013 diff hist +1,091 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: what I was looking for was a simple statement along the lines of "yes there is" or "no there isn't"
• 19:0219:02, 14 October 2013 diff hist +473 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: I don't think that's quite fair
• 18:4018:40, 14 October 2013 diff hist +426 Wikipedia talk:Flow →A comment on engagement: Another ground-rule for discussion I would propose is, please don't answer a question with a question
• 18:3518:35, 14 October 2013 diff hist +305 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Flow software questions: Thanks for that -- I think it's a point well worth emphasising in this project
• 06:2306:23, 14 October 2013 diff hist +274 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Flow software questions: new section

13 October 2013

• 09:3509:35, 13 October 2013 diff hist +916 User talk:MPinchuk (WMF) (usurped) →Ideology: new section
• 09:0609:06, 13 October 2013 diff hist −8 Wikipedia talk:Flow moving to more approriate section
• 09:0209:02, 13 October 2013 diff hist +1,116 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: Additional. A huge amount of work to do to document and codify (in all senses) the various discussion structures in use or likely to be needed in the future
• 07:0607:06, 13 October 2013 diff hist +2,981 Wikipedia talk:Flow →A comment on language: new section

12 October 2013

• 06:4206:42, 12 October 2013 diff hist +569 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: Either or both or indeed anything of the kind

11 October 2013

• 21:1421:14, 11 October 2013 diff hist +207 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Discussion structures: That's ... ambitious
• 16:2216:22, 11 October 2013 diff hist +394 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Only replying to the original post, and no possibility to have subsections?: Oddities
• 15:5615:56, 11 October 2013 diff hist +702 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Request for your feedback: Let's talk about nesting!: the question could best be answered after having had sight of the taxonomy of discussion structures