User contributions for Spiker 22
Appearance
Results for Spiker 22 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 166 edits. Account created on 12 November 2007.
29 November 2022
- 15:4815:48, 29 November 2022 diff hist +2 Talk:Marcionism →Belief in the writings of Jesus, the meaning of redaction and current scholarship
- 15:4615:46, 29 November 2022 diff hist 0 Talk:Marcionism →Belief in the writings of Jesus, the meaning of redaction and current scholarship
- 15:4515:45, 29 November 2022 diff hist −2 Talk:Marcionism →Belief in the writings of Jesus, the meaning of redaction and current scholarship
- 15:4315:43, 29 November 2022 diff hist +4 Talk:Marcionism →Belief in the writings of Jesus, the meaning of redaction and current scholarship
- 15:1715:17, 29 November 2022 diff hist +864 Talk:Marcionism →Belief in the writings of Jesus, the meaning of redaction and current scholarship: new section Tag: New topic
- 15:0915:09, 29 November 2022 diff hist +314 Talk:Marcionism →Fringe theory: Reply Tag: Reply
4 October 2020
- 17:0417:04, 4 October 2020 diff hist +321 Talk:Papias of Hierapolis No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:5316:53, 4 October 2020 diff hist +647 Talk:Papias of Hierapolis →Should be fixed: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 September 2019
- 04:5504:55, 16 September 2019 diff hist +793 Talk:Andrew McCabe →Was this written by the Committe to save McCabe Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 04:3304:33, 16 September 2019 diff hist +27 Talk:Andrew McCabe →Was this written by the Committe to save McCabe: Mubashgu Please don't change my title. The article is CLEARLY slanted towards MCabe. "Andrew McCarthy, on the other hand, is not a reliable source, despite his long-ago experience as an SDNY prosecutor. He has since become yet another partisan polemicist for a conservative publication. For example, he states "no reason to conclude that an indictment was sought," which is preposterous on its face because the only reason the government impa... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 September 2019
- 21:3821:38, 15 September 2019 diff hist +2,022 Talk:Andrew McCabe →Was this written by the committee to save McCabe?: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
4 July 2019
- 16:0016:00, 4 July 2019 diff hist +314 Talk:Ferdinand Christian Baur No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
26 June 2019
- 22:5822:58, 26 June 2019 diff hist +833 Talk:Ferdinand Christian Baur →Hegelian influence: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
18 August 2018
- 21:0821:08, 18 August 2018 diff hist +291 Talk:Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0021:00, 18 August 2018 diff hist +999 Talk:Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles →Apologetic?: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
26 February 2018
- 20:0620:06, 26 February 2018 diff hist +2,986 User talk:Spiker 22 →apostles established churches?: new section current
- 01:4201:42, 26 February 2018 diff hist +1,251 User talk:AlexanderHovanec →Apostles: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 February 2018
- 16:3316:33, 25 February 2018 diff hist +24 Apostles in the New Testament No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
18 October 2017
- 20:1720:17, 18 October 2017 diff hist +566 N User talk:70.164.243.230 Just too sloppy
11 September 2016
- 01:5601:56, 11 September 2016 diff hist +995 Talk:Al Gore →Supreme Court: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 September 2016
- 02:5202:52, 5 September 2016 diff hist −2 Talk:Forged (book) →minor mistakes: Still trying to fix mystery formatting Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:4802:48, 5 September 2016 diff hist +1 Talk:Forged (book) →minor mistakes: Trying to fix formatting. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:4702:47, 5 September 2016 diff hist +1 Talk:Forged (book) →minor mistakes: Jvd Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:4302:43, 5 September 2016 diff hist 0 Talk:Forged (book) →minor mistakes: fixed formatting. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:3702:37, 5 September 2016 diff hist +734 Talk:Forged (book) →minor mistakes: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
18 September 2013
- 20:5520:55, 18 September 2013 diff hist +1,628 Talk:Dialectic →dialectic
20 June 2012
- 04:2904:29, 20 June 2012 diff hist +950 Talk:Empty tomb →Historicity and scholarly consensus
- 03:5903:59, 20 June 2012 diff hist +985 Talk:Empty tomb No edit summary
23 August 2011
- 23:5023:50, 23 August 2011 diff hist −4 User:Oldspammer →Just how much of a fool is Oldspooger?
- 23:5023:50, 23 August 2011 diff hist +207 User:Oldspammer No edit summary
- 23:3923:39, 23 August 2011 diff hist −5,254 User talk:Spiker 22 /* If wikipedia wants to accept crackpot theories, please do not post them on my talk page ^/
- 23:3023:30, 23 August 2011 diff hist −16 Friedrich Hayek No edit summary
- 23:2623:26, 23 August 2011 diff hist +4 Friedrich Hayek No edit summary
25 December 2010
- 09:3809:38, 25 December 2010 diff hist +1 Talk:Monetization →Wrong? How bout dead wrong?
- 09:3609:36, 25 December 2010 diff hist −93 Talk:Monetization →==
- 09:3609:36, 25 December 2010 diff hist +1,550 Talk:Monetization →Fake word coined by fake people
4 June 2010
20 May 2010
19 May 2010
- 23:5923:59, 19 May 2010 diff hist +9 Talk:Monetization →Fake word coined by fake people
- 23:5823:58, 19 May 2010 diff hist −11 Talk:Monetization →==
- 23:5423:54, 19 May 2010 diff hist +1,371 Talk:Monetization →Fake word coined by fake people
14 May 2010
- 17:4717:47, 14 May 2010 diff hist +1 Talk:Thomas Sowell →Extravagant idol worship
- 17:4617:46, 14 May 2010 diff hist +173 Talk:Thomas Sowell →Extravagant idol worship
1 April 2010
19 February 2010
- 20:1720:17, 19 February 2010 diff hist +391 Talk:The Falcon and the Snowman →Chris's "disillusion": new section
16 July 2008
14 July 2008
- 06:4006:40, 14 July 2008 diff hist +98 Talk:Douglas Feith →is a neconservative ?
- 06:3506:35, 14 July 2008 diff hist −4 Talk:Douglas Feith →is a neconservative ?
- 06:3306:33, 14 July 2008 diff hist +1,464 Talk:Douglas Feith →is a neconservative ?