User contributions for Universal-777

11 July 2008

• 20:5420:54, 11 July 2008 diff hist +81 Segregated cycle facilities Lacks a NPOV

9 July 2008

• 04:2604:26, 9 July 2008 diff hist 0 m Talk:Segregated cycle facilities No edit summary
• 03:5703:57, 9 July 2008 diff hist +5 Segregated cycle facilities →Urban roads
• 03:5503:55, 9 July 2008 diff hist +92 Talk:Segregated cycle facilities →Lacking a Neutral Point of View
• 03:5403:54, 9 July 2008 diff hist +623 Talk:Segregated cycle facilities No edit summary
• 03:3603:36, 9 July 2008 diff hist +8 Segregated cycle facilities The entire article lack a neutral point of view and is rooted in VC ideology.
• 03:3403:34, 9 July 2008 diff hist +22 m Segregated cycle facilities Undid revision 222454841 by Sf (talk)
• 03:3003:30, 9 July 2008 diff hist +378 m Segregated cycle facilities Undid revision 224396489 by Sf (talk)

8 June 2008

• 14:1814:18, 8 June 2008 diff hist +122 Segregated cycle facilities Accepted risk level

6 June 2008

• 02:4702:47, 6 June 2008 diff hist +1 m Talk:Segregated cycle facilities →Lack of NPOV
• 02:4502:45, 6 June 2008 diff hist +111 m Talk:Segregated cycle facilities No edit summary
• 02:0902:09, 6 June 2008 diff hist −8 m Segregated cycle facilities Tag changed
• 02:0402:04, 6 June 2008 diff hist +162 m Segregated cycle facilities Added details to the reference
• 01:3201:32, 6 June 2008 diff hist +1 m Vehicular cycling Self editing: precision provided.

1 June 2008

• 22:2522:25, 1 June 2008 diff hist +1 Talk:Segregated cycle facilities Additional material and examples

31 May 2008

• 04:3904:39, 31 May 2008 diff hist +532 Talk:Segregated cycle facilities No edit summary
• 04:2704:27, 31 May 2008 diff hist −8 Segregated cycle facilities Lacks NPOV: the article is rooted in the VC ideology and is one-sided. Also severe problems with the references: documents showing various defects such as poor quality data, advocacy tone, etc....
• 04:1404:14, 31 May 2008 diff hist +16 Segregated cycle facilities →Urban roads: This section lacks NPOV. It is one sided, rooted in VC ideology with references exhibiting poor quality data, advocacy tone, unverifiable conclusions, etc...

20 May 2008

• 17:1417:14, 20 May 2008 diff hist −27 m Segregated cycle facilities Minor edit of my previous edit
• 17:0117:01, 20 May 2008 diff hist +1 m Segregated cycle facilities →1980s to present
• 16:5916:59, 20 May 2008 diff hist +1 m Vehicular cycling No edit summary
• 07:5007:50, 20 May 2008 diff hist −211 Segregated cycle facilities Adding to the cautionary note.
• 07:3807:38, 20 May 2008 diff hist −486 Segregated cycle facilities →The safety of segregated cycle facilities: Providing balance and a NPOV in a blatant advocacy piece rooted in the vehicular cycling ideology.
• 07:2007:20, 20 May 2008 diff hist −4 m Segregated cycle facilities →1980s to present
• 07:2007:20, 20 May 2008 diff hist +73 Segregated cycle facilities →1980s to present: Providing balance and a NPOV.
• 07:1407:14, 20 May 2008 diff hist +1,150 Segregated cycle facilities →Urban roads: Providing a cautionary note about an article that is obviously lacking a NPOV.
• 06:3806:38, 20 May 2008 diff hist −832 Vehicular cycling →Advocacy: Providing balance as the tone of the article otherwise lacks a NPOV and is essentially an advocacy piece rooted in the vehicular cycling ideology.
• 05:5205:52, 20 May 2008 diff hist −1 m Vehicular cycling →Segregated cycling
• 05:4405:44, 20 May 2008 diff hist −332 Vehicular cycling →Segregated cycling: Providing more balance and a NPOV here in the context of what reads like an advocacy piece rooted in the vehicular cycling ideology.