Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 August 4

4 August 2022

Draft:Sphere Matchers

Draft:Sphere Matchers (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

Draft:Bobik Platz (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

Draft was speedly deleted under G3 criteria, when G3: Blatant hoax didn't apply because the company and the supposed video game in development is real. Unfortunately though, the IGN links on the references on both draft articles are dead links and I couldn't find anything beside the FANDOM page about both company and the game they developed. Also, the first page hasn't been submitted yet and full create-protection is unnecessary for the latter case. 36.74.42.66 (talk) 14:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

• Just need some source to show it meets WP:V. My sense is that it is a hoax, but if you can provide a RS, I'd agree with a restoration. Hobit (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Actually, no, V is a much higher bar than not-G3-able, especially in draft space. I don't really think we need anything to overcome G3 other than a good-faith assertion that it's real. Jclemens (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

    @Hobit Here's the reliable source [1], besides IGN which articles about the aforementioned subject are noindexed from Google or just dead links. 36.74.42.66 (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Princess Princep Shah of Nepal

Princess Princep Shah of Nepal (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Was closed (very reasonably and agreeably) with not much discussion, no arguments to keep, I think everyone missed that she passes WP:ANYBIO on the basis of her Nansen Refugee Award I'd like to work on the article CT55555 (talk) 14:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

• Comment Please note that the closer is agreeable to this request. Link. CT55555 (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
• Restore I interpret the close as a WP:SOFTDELETE (except with a redirect rather than a deletion), which means that the deletion can be WP:REFUNDed upon any good-faith request, and we've had such a request here. The original close wasn't wrong (thus this is not an "overturn"), but is no longer relevant. --ais523 15:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks. I see it the same way. I think the policy forces me to ask here, but it seems non-controversial, I'd be surprised if anyone finds this disagreeable. CT55555 (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

  Restore per ais523. Hobit (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)