Talk:1991 European Cup final

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia or Serbia?

This matter is getting ridiculous now. Yes, UEFA attributes Red Star's win in the 1991 European Cup Final to Serbia, but at the time Serbia did not exist as a separate nation; at least not in footballing terms. I realise that MOS:FLAG applies to flags, but the clause in it that reads "Do not rewrite history" could equally apply to text, and so we should only refer to Red Star as being a club from SFR Yugoslavia in this article. Furthermore, we don't need to specify that UEFA considers Serbia to be the successor to any Yugoslavian honours as it's actually irrelevant to this article. The only time this would need to be mentioned is probably at List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winners. – Pee Jay 00:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"We don't need to specify that UEFA considers Serbia to be the successor to any Yugoslavian honours as it's actually irrelevant to this article". It is relevant because:

1.Yugoslavia does not exist anymore except as Serbia that inhereted its legal status in UEFA so we may reffer to it as one same thing. PLASTIC EXAMPLE: Imagine your name is John. And lets say you graduate at university and afterwards you decide to change your name to Jack. Do we have right to claim that Jack doesn`t have university degree? 2.Club is based in Serbia and was so even during Yugoslavia`s existance. It qualified for Yugoslav league through Serbian league. 3.Article itself has a note that encourages people to include additional references to improve its quality. CONCLUSION: We "do not rewrite history". Arbitrary judgements to what is relevant/irrelevant to this article hold no firm ground. - Zoran —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.203.115.59 (talk) 07:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Serbia inherited Yugoslavia's international record, but in 1991 Yugoslavia still existed. That's the point I'm trying to make here. I'm not saying it's completely irrelevant, only that it has no place in this particular article. And yes, the club is based in Serbia, but in 1991 Serbia was just a part of SFR Yugoslavia and didn't have its own FIFA-affiliated football association. Finally, yes, we are encouraged to add references to source content, but not to espouse our own national agenda. – Pee Jay 07:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current Serbian FA is renamed Yugoslav FA that is FIFA-affiliated since 1919. If you believe UEFA is espousing Serbian national agenda then there might be something fishy with your own agenda. Reference to UEFA page cannot do anything else than benefit this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.203.115.59 (talk) 07:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would either party object to the presence of a simple note in a Notes section saying something like "After the breakup of SFR Yugoslavia, UEFA assigned that country's football honours to the Serbian Football Association." Referenced to that UEFA page, but properly formatted and with the correct page title? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would not object. Thanks Struway2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.203.115.59 (talk) 08:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. I don't see that the article is trying to prescribe Red Star's European Cup title to Yugoslavia, only that it is mentioning the country that they were representing in that season's competition. The fate of the Yugoslav FA after 1991 is not relevant, IMO. – Pee Jay 13:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there is and should be no political aspect to this article. Yugoslavia is the historically-accurate name of the country whose football association was being represented by Red Star in 1991, and that's why it's mentioned, and the fate of the Yugoslav FA after 1991 isn't desperately relevant per se. Though I don't think it would do any harm to mention that the club now represents Serbia.

However, I just fixed the dead external link to the 1990–91 season at the UEFA website, and in the live link, UEFA refers to the club as Crvena zvezda, despite Red Star is the English common name. Given the potential for confusion for the non-expert reader – that the official body for the competition refers to the club by a different name from the one used in this article – I think we actually do need a note to clarify.

How about "UEFA conventionally refers to Red Star Belgrade by the club's Serbian-language name, Crvena zvezda. Since the breakup of SFR Yugoslavia, the club competes under the auspices of its successor Serbian Football Association." referenced to both what is currently the UEFA external link, and to the UEFA Serbia honours page. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fair enough. – Pee Jay 16:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That text is now in a Notes section in the article. Thanks to both for getting this sorted. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1991 European Cup Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007090417/http://www.sportal.rs:80/news.php?id=58499 to http://www.sportal.rs/news.php?id=58499

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1956 European Cup Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]