Talk:2018 Czech Senate election

Numbers

I'm pretty sure the current unsourced numbers that were in the first round then got moved in the not up column are actually the numbers of candidates qualifying for the second round, as can be seen from the number for CSSD given in this article : https://www.reuters.com/article/us-czech-election/czech-pms-party-wins-municipal-elections-idUSKCN1MG0TC so I think they should be deleted or written in the article's text, as we don't usually included such numbers in result tables. Cordially. --Aréat (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good spot. I've removed them entirely. Number 5 7 23:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ;) --Aréat (talk) 23:06, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers bis

How can there be a total of 417,772 votes among 420,118 registered voters in the second round with a 16.49 turnout rate? Some number must be off on here.--Aréat (talk) 13:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was an error; 417,772 appears to be the valid votes and 420,118 the total. I've moved the latter to the total row. Number 5 7 13:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Make more sense.--Aréat (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number ter

The total seats column, 16+7+13+16+10+1+3+6+1+1+1+1+1+6, make 83 and not 81 ?--Aréat (talk) 17:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever created the existing seats column has got it wrong as there are 56 seats listed as not being up for election instead of 54 (unfortunately the table is riddled with errors both in terms of votes and seats). Perhaps Bedivere.cs or ThecentreCZ can help sort it? Cheers, Number 5 7 17:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The +/– figures are all over the place too:

ODS – 4 seats up for election, won 10, marked as +7 rather than +6
ANO – 0 seats up for election, won one, marked as zero change rater than +1
KDU-ČSL – 2 seats up for election, won 2, marked as +2 rather than no change
Mayors and Independents – 2 seats up for election, won 5, marked as +5 rather than +3

Who put these results together, because almost every aspect of the table was wrong (I had to correct the vote figures in the last couple of days). Number 5 7 17:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't we always fill the +/- column in elections page as compared to the previous election, rather than the composition of the house just before the election? The numbers of seat up here must be misleading if so.--Aréat (talk) 21:50, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]